Global Flood explains Oil Deposits and Geological layers

a reply to: cooperton

Hardly explains or addresses the multitude of issues and head-scratching conundrums associated with the tale of Noahs Ark all the same.

Mr Garrison's crude interpretations aside, the theory of evolution is widely accepted within the scientific community and is considered one of the foundational principles of biology.

There is evidence supporting the theory of evolution, that comes from multiple scientific disciplines, including paleontology, comparative anatomy, embryology, molecular biology, and genetics.

Never mind the fact that the fossil records show a progression of life forms over time that fits with our understanding of the evolutionary process.

With the simpler organisms appearing in older rock layers, and more complex ones in more recent layers.

a reply to: andy06shake

For me, the Younger Dryas explains myths (if any) regarding the world flooding. Gobekli Tepi shows plenty of people kicking around at the time with enough savvy to pass on that memory. Coastal inundations everywhere.

Some would rather have Noah, his menagerie and genocidal deity. Such is the way.

a reply to: midicon

For me, the Younger Dryas explains myths (if any) regarding the world flooding. Gobekli Tepi shows plenty of people kicking around at the time with enough savvy to pass on that memory. Coastal inundations everywhere.

Oh i don't doubt there was flooding during the Younger Dryas, and at many other points in the past, but not of the global sorts simply due to the fact that there is no real evidence to support the notion.

Some would rather have Noah, his menagerie and genocidal deity. Such is the way.

I kind of envy them their peace of mind but ffs the nonsense just does not fly.

It's hard to take people who entertain the notion of Noah's Ark in any sort of literal sense seriously.

But god love them anyway eh.

originally posted by: midicon
a reply to: andy06shake

For me, the Younger Dryas explains myths (if any) regarding the world flooding. Gobekli Tepi shows plenty of people kicking around at the time with enough savvy to pass on that memory. Coastal inundations everywhere.

Some would rather have Noah, his menagerie and genocidal deity. Such is the way.

Something happened at some point look at Puma Punku our history or what they teach isn't correct If it was a flood imagine the force of water to destroy Puma Punku .

a reply to: Ravenwatcher

I think there is some suggestion they buried it, and then dug it up, and then buried it again. over an expanded period of time, rinse and repeat type scenario.

Also, suggestions the site may have been affected by an earthquake, perhaps accompanied by a tidal wave from Lake Titicaca.

Edit: By the looks of it im confusing Gobekli Tepi with Pumapunku. LoL

But i think there is speculation one of them was buried to hide the site in some manner.

I could be wrong.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Ravenwatcher

I think there is some suggestion they buried it, and then dug it up, and then buried it again. over an expanded period of time, rinse and repeat type scenario.

Also, suggestions the site may have been affected by an earthquake, perhaps accompanied by a tidal wave from Lake Titicaca.

Edit: By the looks of it im confusing Gobekli Tepi with Pumapunku. LoL

But i think there is speculation one of them was buried to hide the site in some manner.

I could be wrong.

Earth Quake would be more of a crumble situation Puma Punku was spread out like it was driven by water . You are correct about Gobekli Tempi they buried it for some reason .

a reply to: andy06shake

Now that I think of it that meteor strike in the Yucatán Peninsula that killed the Dinos could of caused a flood myth and destroyed Puma Punku .


Yeah i know Dino's did not walk with Humans -----bull

a reply to: Ravenwatcher

A 65 million-year-old flood myth through if that were the case.

And is widely believed to be a significant factor in the mass extinction event that led to the end of the Cretaceous period and the extinction of the dinosaurs.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Ravenwatcher

A 65 million-year-old flood myth through if that were the case.

And is widely believed to be a significant factor in the mass extinction event that led to the end of the Cretaceous period and the extinction of the dinosaurs.

Wonder how much water that strike put up into the air it would have evaporated an extreme amount and caused tsunamis on a scale beyond believe .

a reply to: Ravenwatcher

Not sure mate, my guess would be lots.

But you have put me in mind to go rewatch "Armageddon" or "Deep Impact".

So cheers, was looking for something to watch.

What about the fact that everest is getting taller every year? Thats due to the tectonic plates still pushing together. Eversest wasnt always a mountain. It was uplifted from tectonic forces to its current altitude.

The suface of the earth has changed dramatically. The appalachian range used to connect to scottland highlands and the west african atlas moutnains. They got torn apart by a rift that is still spreading apart at th3 bottom of atlantic ocean.

Everest was formed by subduction of asian plate under the indian plate forcing its edge its current new altitude. There was definitely a massive flood but was it global? Probably not but over massive regions absolutely. The old coast line is still visible on google earth around the u.s. for 3 to 400 miles out is the coast line before the northern ice caps rapidly melted causing massive flooding across noteth america europe Mediterranean and middle east and even norther africa. The world coast lines chaned from all the influx of water. But not every land mass was submerged bc of this event. But it explains why so many cultures have stories about the great flood. Most ancient groups lived near the coast so if coast lines are changing thats gonna flood most civilizations that werent directly affected by the ice sheets melting.

Oil and gas is from decomposing organics trapped under layers of rock. It doesnt have to be trapped from a flood. Think of a swamp or a bog there are plants living in them trees, grasses, water lillies cat tails etc. They are living in constantly increasing sediment. Th3 sediment eventually covers the plants either bc they die or more sediment is deposited covering these plants and all of the algae and other orangics living on the system. Over time more layers are deposited increasing pressure and temp. Then other geologic forced cover those layers incrasing pressure till eventually oil and natural gas have formed from the decomposition and pressure of the organics. Have the figured out how to artificially make oil rapidly now yes. But thats an artificial modern technoligical method not the naturally occuring process. Modern methods are meant to reduce time and energy consumption thats what technology is /does it inceases efficiency of whatever process its based.
Dinosaurs def werent around 12kya it takes much longer than that for a fossil to form. We dont find "dinosaur bones" we find fossils of dinosaur bones. Fossils are not bones they are rocks usually that have over enough time have replaced the organic bones through chemical reactions. There are a few diffent propcesses that make diffent types of fossils but we pretty much never find dinosaur bones just the fossil remnants. The process takes to long for them to be only 12ky old. We find frosen animals with meat thats still edible from 12kya all the time. We find lion cubs from 30kya that look like they are just sleeping theyre frozen so well. But given that the time dinosaur lived and those same animals wouldnt be in that same pristine condition. Reply to: cooperton

It's remarkable that creationists want this nonsense taught in science classes at schools.

originally posted by: cooperton

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Ravenwatcher

Congrats everyone, you're the retarded offspring of 5 monkeys having butt sex with a fish squirrel.

Cool.

The Logistics and Challenges in the Collection, Housing, and Redistribution of 8.7 Million Species of Animals.

Because these 8.7 million species always existed exactly as today, with no chance deviation from designed form, we are left with what seems like an insurmountable objective.

8.7 million species. 5% vertebrate, 95% invertibrate. Selective habitats across the world. Just as many food chains.

To accommodate every animal species segregated housing areas are required. With 435,000 estimated vertebrates, you need at least 435,000 units of varying size and purpose. The aquatic life presents another set of challenges.

Insects would require even more space, being smaller is way offset by being 95% of the animals species.

This would prove intense. There's a lot of habitats to cover. Every sea and freshwater creature collected. The Blue Whale tank alone is quite a few cubits in diameter.

Noah's submarine would need to all capture the giant squid and other animals in the abyss too. Even the weird extremophile fish at sulfur vents.

Sexing fish, birds, insects, and animals not easily determined would be difficult. But ultimately would need to be accomplished to preserve all the created species.

Animals like sponges, Coral, and jellyfish, which don't have genders would be single specimen Collection.

But it could be done. Assuming Noah can move at Tachyon speed like Santa, and have an adequate transport networks for whales, and elephants, and camels and such. And have the requisite number of pens or housing areas, and constrict a boat the size of Manhattan with 8.7 million different cages.

And do it at 600 years old!

Sigh...

Before you go and butcher geology and all earth science again, folks might want to actually grasp how COMPLETELY implausible it is to take this PARABLE at face value.

It's the great parable of special snowflake punishment. Another occurance of humans thinking catastrophe happens for a reason. The purposeful reward for destructive behavior. Deliberate and by intelligence instead of bad things just happening as a matter of default.

Like an airburst hit the area around Tall El Hammam (and about 6 other villages) because people were sinning there. Never coincidence.

And a tidal wave took out Sumatra and Japan because the fisherman were not keeping to their sustainable fish and dolphin quota.

originally posted by: Ohanka
It's remarkable that creationists want this nonsense taught in science classes at schools.

As opposed to teaching 980 genders, men can be women and nobody being taught in school what a woman is without circular logic by claiming a woman is without using the word "woman".

Funny how in teaching subjective truth as a reality fact you can only be objective against Christian truth and Biblical science.
Only

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: cooperton

Hardly explains or addresses the multitude of issues and head-scratching conundrums associated with the tale of Noahs Ark all the same.

Mr Garrison's crude interpretations aside, the theory of evolution is widely accepted within the scientific community and is considered one of the foundational principles of biology.

There is evidence supporting the theory of evolution, that comes from multiple scientific disciplines, including paleontology, comparative anatomy, embryology, molecular biology, and genetics.

Never mind the fact that the fossil records show a progression of life forms over time that fits with our understanding of the evolutionary process.

With the simpler organisms appearing in older rock layers, and more complex ones in more recent layers.

Foundational truths of biology?
What is a woman?

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

No i'm also against teaching that idiotic cult in school as well.

a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Foundational truths of biology?

There are four unifying principles that form the foundation of modern biology FarmerSimulation.

Cell theory, evolution by natural selection, genetic heredity and homeostasis.

faculty.mtsac.edu...

What is a woman?

I suggest you buck up the courage and ask one.

After all, they don't bite, well unless you ask them nicely.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: FarmerSimulation

Foundational truths of biology?

There are four unifying principles that form the foundation of modern biology FarmerSimulation.

Cell theory, evolution by natural selection, genetic heredity and homeostasis.

faculty.mtsac.edu...

What is a woman?

I suggest you buck up the courage and ask one.

After all, they don't bite, well unless you ask them nicely.

That whooooooshing sound was "it" flying over your head