It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thanks BS, I surely will. Not that I need your permission, of course
Meanwhile, I'll go and put my feet up in the sunshine and ponder how I will enjoy the rest of my leisurely life
Go right ahead.
It doesn't guarantee they won't grow up to be one
We have multiple kids. I'll make sure they grow up knowing that it's not OK to be a parasite.
It is the fault of the person signing the loan. Regardless if they did not plan either way.
Now, if the market were allowed to correct itself, on its own, like say foreclosing on those that could no longer make the payments, this process would have ended a lot sooner.
It is the fault of the banker, as they wrote the loans knowing that the person signing the paper was worth nothing.
It is the fault of the Govt for pressing the idea that "all can have a home", and making it an option for the banks to construct such loans.
And it is the fault of society, which has instilled on the masses that "right now, now now now" is the way.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by macman
It is the fault of the person signing the loan. Regardless if they did not plan either way.
Now, if the market were allowed to correct itself, on its own, like say foreclosing on those that could no longer make the payments, this process would have ended a lot sooner.
It is the fault of the banker, as they wrote the loans knowing that the person signing the paper was worth nothing.
It is the fault of the Govt for pressing the idea that "all can have a home", and making it an option for the banks to construct such loans.
And it is the fault of society, which has instilled on the masses that "right now, now now now" is the way.
Ah, the ole blame everyone position, rather than convict the people who actually committed the crimes.
While we all are guilty of making mistakes on a regular basis, in the recent run up, the fact is clear to everyone, but those who refuse to see the reality.
The bankers intentionally committed crimes. They knowingly and willingly falsified documents (loan ratings) for personal profit.
Sorry, who are you referring to and what are you talking about?
Originally posted by Aeons
Yeah, I don't like your idea.
You are trying to fix corruption with another system of corruption. I'm not interested. I'll actively work against you.
Originally posted by gentledissident
Sorry, who are you referring to and what are you talking about? [/quote
Originally posted by Aeons
Yeah, I don't like your idea.
You are trying to fix corruption with another system of corruption. I'm not interested. I'll actively work against you.
The OP.
If the system is based on constantly improving efficiency, how does this not mean growth?
Originally posted by Aeons
The system doesn't allow for growth.
Why would it not be a government of the people where the means of production are owned by the people?
Originally posted by Aeons
The system means giving over every aspect of human life to a system that you have to hope will be a benign dictatorship.
As I stated, it's all about innovation. Innovation's reward is less work and rewarding leisure.
Originally posted by Aeons
It removes reward for innovation, and indeed discourages it as being disruptive to the system.
I'm not happy in our system. Am I the enemy?
Originally posted by Aeons
It presumes that everyone would be happy in this system, which would make anyone who is not an enemy.
It's based on innovation to insure all are cared for through as little work as possible.
Originally posted by Aeons
It is based on conformity of thought, so variation from it would be traitorous.
Our new work will reward us with more leisure time.
Originally posted by Aeons
It presumes work is free.
They just enjoy leisure more than you. It would be no problem for most of the "lazy" to do their small part in our new world.
Originally posted by Aeons
It would lead to a system of expansionism as the needed extra resources must be provided from outside this system to float the vast numbers of the lazy - and yes, they are lazy.
With all that free time, I would think we would be more expressive.
Originally posted by Aeons
It requires a controlled monoculture.
Energy is free. It takes little variety of food to keep us healthy. If your passion is food, grow some in your extended free time.
Originally posted by Aeons
Work is a necessary function of energy production, even in an agrarian system. Presuming that food comes without work is not just selfish, but literally contrary to physics. Automation would mean even worse mono agriculture, or to go the other way requires work. Which then removes the entire basis of your system.
I was merely responding. did you think I was trying to convert you?
Originally posted by Aeons
Oh man. You didn't bring me onside at all there.
Will "Creepy" be the sum of your response?
Originally posted by Aeons
Not interested. At all. Deeply not interested. Creepy.
I don't believe in gods or spirits. Creating havoc in most societies will get you removed from play.
Originally posted by Aeons
I swear to God I will channel Loki and wreck havoc.
Originally posted by Aeons
I will not work to support your lazy butt.
Originally posted by Aeons
We are not working a share. For a share, we would have agree on the goal. I don't agree with your goal, so my share is not a share it is enforced slavery. The ultimate irony.