It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by macman
Once again,
THE BANKERS INTENTIONALLY COMMITTED CRIMES,
while the people losing their homes simply, foolishly, agreed to harsh terms that they hoped they could meet, with no intent on defaulting.
This is the reality you refuse to acknowledge.
Originally posted by Aeons
The system doesn't allow for growth.
The system means giving over every aspect of human life to a system that you have to hope will be a benign dictatorship.
It removes reward for innovation, and indeed discourages it as being disruptive to the system.
It presumes that everyone would be happy in this system, which would make anyone who is not an enemy.
It is based on conformity of thought, so variation from it would be traitorous.
It presumes work is free.
It would lead to a system of expansionism as the needed extra resources must be provided from outside this system to float the vast numbers of the lazy - and yes, they are lazy.
It requires a controlled monoculture.
Work is a necessary function of energy production, even in an agrarian system. Presuming that food comes without work is not just selfish, but literally contrary to physics. Automation would mean even worse mono agriculture, or to go the other way requires work. Which then removes the entire basis of your system.
That'd be beginning.
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Actually I think you misinterpreted the post. What I argue is a separation of work and food. In fact, I argue that food and shelter are a basic human right. How a human right to food and shelter makes someone a conformist slave to a benign dictatorship needs some explanation. Because in fact it frees people from working simply to pay their bills and wait for the next check so they can....pay their bills.
.
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Actually I think you misinterpreted the post. What I argue is a separation of work and food. In fact, I argue that food and shelter are a basic human right. How a human right to food and shelter makes someone a conformist slave to a benign dictatorship needs some explanation. Because in fact it frees people from working simply to pay their bills and wait for the next check so they can....pay their bills.
.
Because when the master, that provides you food and shelter says jump, you better reply with "how high".
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Actually I think you misinterpreted the post. What I argue is a separation of work and food. In fact, I argue that food and shelter are a basic human right. How a human right to food and shelter makes someone a conformist slave to a benign dictatorship needs some explanation. Because in fact it frees people from working simply to pay their bills and wait for the next check so they can....pay their bills.
.
Because when the master, that provides you food and shelter says jump, you better reply with "how high".
Why do you think that the only way to get things done is with massive central planning, heirarchy and control structures? Those things are breaking down right before our eyes. We've tried that for 10,000 years and its never worked. Every fallen empire is evidence of this.
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Actually I think you misinterpreted the post. What I argue is a separation of work and food. In fact, I argue that food and shelter are a basic human right. How a human right to food and shelter makes someone a conformist slave to a benign dictatorship needs some explanation. Because in fact it frees people from working simply to pay their bills and wait for the next check so they can....pay their bills.
.
Because when the master, that provides you food and shelter says jump, you better reply with "how high".
Why do you think that the only way to get things done is with massive central planning, heirarchy and control structures? Those things are breaking down right before our eyes. We've tried that for 10,000 years and its never worked. Every fallen empire is evidence of this.
It always comes down to someone having to be in control.
What is the quote from the Patriot movie, "why should I trade one tyrant three thousand miles away for three thousand tyrants one mile away"
What you suggest is a commune. That is all fine, but not for me.
No thanks.
What I work for is mine to benefit from, no one else.
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Actually I think you misinterpreted the post. What I argue is a separation of work and food. In fact, I argue that food and shelter are a basic human right. How a human right to food and shelter makes someone a conformist slave to a benign dictatorship needs some explanation. Because in fact it frees people from working simply to pay their bills and wait for the next check so they can....pay their bills.
.
Because when the master, that provides you food and shelter says jump, you better reply with "how high".
What I work for is mine to benefit from, no one else.
Originally posted by Aeons
reply to post by doctornamtab
I don't misunderstand you - I'm not participating in your delusion. It isn't the same thing.
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Actually I think you misinterpreted the post. What I argue is a separation of work and food. In fact, I argue that food and shelter are a basic human right. How a human right to food and shelter makes someone a conformist slave to a benign dictatorship needs some explanation. Because in fact it frees people from working simply to pay their bills and wait for the next check so they can....pay their bills.
.
Because when the master, that provides you food and shelter says jump, you better reply with "how high".
Why do you think that the only way to get things done is with massive central planning, heirarchy and control structures? Those things are breaking down right before our eyes. We've tried that for 10,000 years and its never worked. Every fallen empire is evidence of this.
It always comes down to someone having to be in control.
What is the quote from the Patriot movie, "why should I trade one tyrant three thousand miles away for three thousand tyrants one mile away"
What you suggest is a commune. That is all fine, but not for me.
No thanks.
What I work for is mine to benefit from, no one else.
So you obviously make your kids work for their food right? No freeloaders, right? Of course not. That'd be ludicious. You're family and family doesnt do that. Well what if ALL people were your HUMAN FAMILY. When we step outside of our egotistical little selves, this is the truth. We are all family, we all have one home, Earth. So divisive little games like this is mine, that is yours is selfish, short sighted and just not true. You imagine that you own your land because its written on a piece of paper.
Someone has to be in control because people dont believe in each other. We think exactly the way you're thinking about this thread. "Someone is going to take your stuff. Someone is going to control you." When in reality, you are free. The only way to free EVERYONE is to work together and believe that we deserve true freedom.
I'm not saying its going to be some utopia but its definiately not a commune. Its nothing like a commune and I never even used those words. A right to free food would create an OPTIONAL MARKET ECONOMY. If you want more stuff to hide away from your human family, thinking its yours to own, then by all means join the optional market economy. In this thread no one has mentioned taking anything from you or anything from anyone else. All I've ever talked about is providing basic life necessities to EVERYONE by fully implementing technology and human empathy, both of which are in states of stagnation right now.
edit on 16-10-2011 by doctornamtab because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Originally posted by Aeons
reply to post by doctornamtab
I don't misunderstand you - I'm not participating in your delusion. It isn't the same thing.
Naw you're here to start arguments and feel better about yourself when other people give up on you. You got a better solution than a right to free food and shelter? We'd love to hear it.
Originally posted by elocin
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Actually I think you misinterpreted the post. What I argue is a separation of work and food. In fact, I argue that food and shelter are a basic human right. How a human right to food and shelter makes someone a conformist slave to a benign dictatorship needs some explanation. Because in fact it frees people from working simply to pay their bills and wait for the next check so they can....pay their bills.
.
Because when the master, that provides you food and shelter says jump, you better reply with "how high".
What I work for is mine to benefit from, no one else.
Not in this world, it isn't. You really think the benefit of all your hard work goes to you and only you?
If you don't have to pay for your food and shelter, the work you do could very well be only for yourself, if that's what you really want. Not everyone thinks like that, a lot of people are happy to help others when they can.edit on 16-10-2011 by elocin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by doctornamtab
reply to post by macman
You're all about control huh? You imitate the dominator model in your own home. You are the master, they are the slaves.
A sustainable, work to eat economy is a pie in the sky idea. Its not going to last ten years let alone two years. The world you're defending is falling apart before your very eyes, read a paper.
Because when the master, that provides you food and shelter says jump, you better reply with "how high".
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by doctornamtab
reply to post by macman
You're all about control huh? You imitate the dominator model in your own home. You are the master, they are the slaves.
A sustainable, work to eat economy is a pie in the sky idea. Its not going to last ten years let alone two years. The world you're defending is falling apart before your very eyes, read a paper.
Yep, because I go home and scare the family with my brutish ways.
Nice application of Alinsky Rules.
The world is not falling apart, It is in upheaval.
The idea of personal property and responsibility has been around for thousands of years, and will remain long after this hiccup.
You have Chicken Little painting with a very broad brush.
What better way to excite the panic, and push people towards this Socialist idea.