It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Plugit
It's their policy of making live pretty much impossible for the ppl of Palestine which don't got a real army to speak of. Of course they are just animals for them, anyone who follows Zionism pretty much think so.
They want them all death, but again they would even loose more support, so just doing it slowly but surely I guess.
To bad they picked a militarized terrorist group to govern them. The Palestinians historically don’t have a very good track record. They’ve earned the title animals because that’s exactly how they’ve behaved in the past. Just ask Egypt, Kuwait, Lebanon, Denmark, Israel and Jordan.
originally posted by: Plugit
originally posted by: FlyersFan
a reply to: Plugit
You failed to give a link to the source for that information.
And one persons opinion isn't mean it's Israeli policy.
If Israel wanted to genocide the gazans ... they'd all be dead now.
Obviously it's not happening.
So no matter how much some would like to do it, it's not the Israeli plan.
Just google it? but here a few links if you like:
www.timesofisrael.com...
www.theguardian.com...
edition.cnn.com...
It's their policy of making live pretty much impossible for the ppl of Palestine which don't got a real army to speak of. Of course they are just animals for them, anyone who follows Zionism pretty much think so.
They want them all death, but again they would even loose more support, so just doing it slowly but surely I guess.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Plugit
It's their policy of making live pretty much impossible for the ppl of Palestine which don't got a real army to speak of. Of course they are just animals for them, anyone who follows Zionism pretty much think so.
They want them all death, but again they would even loose more support, so just doing it slowly but surely I guess.
At this rate, we are talking 100 years or more. I think you need to think about who feels the people there are animals. Hamas does not provide much of anything, but it still rakes in billions. That no army to speak of is 20,000 or much more and the amount of support is 100,000s.
The Muslim world could have fixed it a long time ago, but it is a thorn in Israel's backside that is used for propaganda purposes. The Muslim world still has a big role to play if they truly want it fixed, but don't hold your breath.
"The range of presumable direct and indirect deaths could be between 15 and 20% of the population already by the end of this year," said U.N. Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese.
Exactly, they’ve had plenty of opportunities and billions of dollars to become somewhat civilized and invest in themselves. There’s no reason for their infrastructure to be the way it is. But when you elect a terrorist group as your government that’s more interested in building tunnels, stocking ammo, weapons, building bombs, stealing and hoarding billions upon billions of dollars for Hamas leaders, the Applebees is going to have to wait.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Plugit
It's their policy of making live pretty much impossible for the ppl of Palestine which don't got a real army to speak of. Of course they are just animals for them, anyone who follows Zionism pretty much think so.
They want them all death, but again they would even loose more support, so just doing it slowly but surely I guess.
At this rate, we are talking 100 years or more. I think you need to think about who feels the people there are animals. Hamas does not provide much of anything, but it still rakes in billions. That no army to speak of is 20,000 or much more and the amount of support is 100,000s.
The Muslim world could have fixed it a long time ago, but it is a thorn in Israel's backside that is used for propaganda purposes. The Muslim world still has a big role to play if they truly want it fixed, but don't hold your breath.
originally posted by: Plugit
You think it's just 30.000 deaths right? dream on, same as with Iraq, I have spoken some Iraqi refugee and his guess there are less then 1/3 of the ppl left after the war against Iraq. We talking about millions (indirect) in Iraq deaths, because it has nothing to do with 9-11 but it was an enemy (and today again pretty much) of Israel (Israel only makes enemy's!).
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
a reply to: gortex
Left out (from OP link):
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) say they "responded with fire toward a main instigator of violent activity who hurled rocks at the forces and posed a threat to them" in the Beita area.
IDF says it was self-defense.
Probably an important and relevant point to include in the OP.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: Plugit
You think it's just 30.000 deaths right? dream on, same as with Iraq, I have spoken some Iraqi refugee and his guess there are less then 1/3 of the ppl left after the war against Iraq. We talking about millions (indirect) in Iraq deaths, because it has nothing to do with 9-11 but it was an enemy (and today again pretty much) of Israel (Israel only makes enemy's!).
I think you know nothing of Iraq. Our war there was very short and then we tried to setup a new government. We were not going out and killing people. The large number of deaths was due to the Sunni and Shia killing each other. Once the Baʿath party was removed by us, the Sunni and Shia went all medieval on each other. I know, I was there and saw the daily reports. The end count wasn't as you suggested either, about 600k which is a huge number but not even 1% of the population. The huge hit in the population was 2006, 2007, 2008, but in 2000 there were 25 million, By 2009 there were still 30 million and today there are 45 million.
As to Gaza, you can't hide the death levels you suggest. Israel would need 10 times the attacks and soldiers involved, and in the day where everyone has a camera, it just isn't happening.
originally posted by: KrustyKrab
Exactly, they’ve had plenty of opportunities and billions of dollars to become somewhat civilized and invest in themselves. There’s no reason for their infrastructure to be the way it is. But when you elect a terrorist group as your government that’s more interested in building tunnels, stocking ammo, weapons, building bombs, stealing and hoarding billions upon billions of dollars for Hamas leaders, the Applebees is going to have to wait.
originally posted by: Plugit
Very short lol? the war after 9-11 lasted over more then 10 years.
The first of these was a brief, conventionally fought war in March–April 2003, in which a combined force of troops from the United States and Great Britain (with smaller contingents from several other countries) invaded Iraq and rapidly defeated Iraqi military and paramilitary forces. It was followed by a longer second phase in which a U.S.-led occupation of Iraq was opposed by an insurgency. After violence began to decline in 2007, the United States gradually reduced its military presence in Iraq, formally completing its withdrawal in December 2011.
The US destroyed the country (same with Libya) and which made place for terrorists yes, even though it was a war against terrorism.
First with sanctions (even no medicine allowed (same as with the ppl of Palastine) making those ppl poor and giving them no future and removing their leader/government (with war, bombing everything), where chaos was reality after. Where mopst of them either died or fled to (mostly) Europe. The US brought them hell and suffering, nothing else. But yea they like doing Israel's wishes, following SATAN.
and to believe you, the IDF randomly shot a person in the head for the LOLZ.
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
Yeah throwing rocks at Soldiers in a Highly Volatile War zone is pretty high up on the list of things that will get you shot in the Face .