Is He Trying to Lose Now?

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: Sookiechacha

By the way, you're "X" link is broken.

No it's not, it's works perfectly.

This is what I get when I click on the link or cut and paste the link into my search bar.

a reply to: FlyersFan

I'd be willing to bet there's more schools with unisex bathrooms than schools with transgender students.

originally posted by: Moon68

If, the law says hygiene products are to be provided to all students that menstruate bathrooms

And, they say some boys menstruate

Then, hygiene products are required in boys bathrooms

^^ Pretty much cuts to the heart of it. Yep.
Common sense reading of the law.

a reply to: FlyersFan

So where are all the schools stocking boys' bathrooms? The largest school district in the state is on record stating they stock girls' restrooms, unisex restrooms, and the nurse's station.

a reply to: FlyersFan

Yeah it is. The law states that the product must be provided for ALL menstruating students.

Nope. There is nothing to be interpreted in that law. What is left up to each individual school district, is how to execute the law, so that ALL menstruating students have access to menstrual products when they need them. Each school district can designate which restrooms are stocked with menstrual supplies and which restrooms are not.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Nope. There is nothing to be interpreted in that law. What is left up to each individual school district, is how to execute the law, so that ALL menstruating students have access to menstrual products when they need them. Each school district can designate which restrooms are stocked with menstrual supplies and which restrooms are not.

If that school interprets the law to say that the product only has to be in the girls room and not the boys room, then they have misinterpreted the spirit of the law, because according to the LGBTQ mafia ... both boys and girls menstruate.

121A.212 ACCESS TO MENSTRUAL PRODUCTS. A school district or charter school must provide students with access to menstrual products at no charge. The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
So you have no proof or evidence for your claims.

Already gave it. The actual letter of the law. The spirit of the law is very clear.
ALL menstruating students in restrooms regularly used ...

121A.212 ACCESS TO MENSTRUAL PRODUCTS. A school district or charter school must provide students with access to menstrual products at no charge. The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district.

Thanks for playing but you lose.

Wow ... delusional ... sugar low? Get that cookie I suggested ...

a reply to: FlyersFan

And the actual legal experts in the article you posted say your interpretation is wrong.

The lawyers for the largest school district in the state say your interpretation is wrong.

Until you can point to a court case that upholds your interpretation, we can only go by the reality of the situation: Your interpretation is wrong.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
Until you can point to a court case that upholds your interpretation, we can only go by the reality of the situation: Your interpretation is wrong.

It's not just my interpretation. It's what the law says. Straight up. And no ... I don't need a court case upholding what I said ... the law says what it says.

121A.212 ACCESS TO MENSTRUAL PRODUCTS. A school district or charter school must provide students with access to menstrual products at no charge. The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district.

Strange how the left is bending over backwards to try to claim the law doesn't say what it clearly does. You'd think they'd be embracing the LGBTQ agenda on this one. That's clearly what was going on here .... instead of saying 'must be available to all female students', it instead says 'all menstruating students'. Anyone with a brain knows that is female students ...but the LGBTQ mafia has twisted that to include boys and therefore the products must be made available to the boys in 'restrooms regularly used by students (them)'. That's boys rooms. Common sense.

a reply to: FlyersFan

No point in beating a dead Liberal horse anymore.

You know you are right and they know you are right but they choose to keep gaslighting.

They'll never admit they are wrong in a million years.

Ha. This is the world we live in. Fighting over tampons in the boys room? No wonder the world laughs at us and it is not because of the Cheeto man.

originally posted by: RazorV66
No point in beating a dead Liberal horse anymore.

True ... three or pages of repeating the law and common sense.

121A.212 ACCESS TO MENSTRUAL PRODUCTS. A school district or charter school must provide students with access to menstrual products at no charge. The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district.

I'm done/OUT.

a reply to: FlyersFan

Except it is your interpretation. Actual lawyers, with law degrees, have interpreted differently.

I wonder who I'm going to believe actually know what the law says.

BEFORE YOU POST.
READ THIS....

Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (Redux)


Community Announcement re: Decorum




These rules apply to all threads and if you want to engage in personal attacks there are other sites on the Internet where you can do that. Our goal is for ATS to be above that. For members here to post like mature adults.
YOU are responsible for your own posts






And, as always...
Do not reply to this post.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: FlyersFan

Except it is your interpretation. Actual lawyers, with law degrees, have interpreted differently.

I wonder who I'm going to believe actually know what the law says.

You also believed the 'lawyers" when it came to the 14th amendment issue. (9-0 SCOTUS ruling...)

originally posted by: Threadbarer
Tonight is the last night of Taylor's European tour and then she's off for a few months. I wonder what the odds are that she shows up on the last night of the DNC.

There's apparently a mystery block on the schedule for tonight and what it's going to be is known to only a few people.

a reply to: Threadbarer

Melania? She's "not going back either". But really, hmm.. thinking Taylor or Beyonce since she's using her song Freedom. But maybe a dark horse? Pence? GWB? I mean the GOP Convention did not have his former VP or any former VP or President, nor have any come forward to endorse him.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: Threadbarer

Melania? She's "not going back either". But really, hmm.. thinking Taylor or Beyonce since she's using her song Freedom. But maybe a dark horse? Pence? GWB? I mean the GOP Convention did not have his former VP or any former VP or President, nor have any come forward to endorse him.

Speculate about the Liberal/Socialist doomsday cult at the DNC all you want, it's going to be all for nothing.

Normal American citizens endorse Trump, that's all he needs.