It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Global Flood explains Oil Deposits and Geological layers

page: 71
36
<< 68  69  70    72  73  74 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 09:53 AM
link   
The premise of this thread has been completely destroyed.

The Noahs Ark myth has been thoroughly dismantled.

Can the thread now die?

The continued 'stupid' hurts the brain ....



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:00 AM
link   
a reply to: cooperton




Is incest overlooked in your mutant ape fairy tale? The two theoretical chromosomal fusion mutants that found eachother against miraculous probability would only be allowed to have their mutant offspring be able to mate with eachother.


But Noah and his incestuous family were Homosapiens when they all decided to keep it in the family and do the deed with wifes, husbands, sons, daughters, and grand children!
If it turns out a small flood was real, you have to give it Noah, convincing his sons that God had killed everyone just so he could get it on with his daughter-in-laws. He must have been a right old dirty pervert.



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Kurokage



He must have been a right old dirty pervert.


Hence the magic sex boat with a pair of every animal i suppose.

Yuk!




posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Kurokage



He must have been a right old dirty pervert.


Hence the magic sex boat with a pair of every animal i suppose.

Yuk!



Those poor animals must have been sore when it came to getting of the Ark.



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: cooperton

Yes, but you sneeringly refer to magic yet you believe it was all done by magic by God?

Quite some irony there.


It was intelligently contrived. Nothing is magic for a Being that transcends time and space.

Life coming from non-life without Intelligent input, on the other hand, is magic because it defies a multitude of thermodynamic laws, such as amino acid polymerization and its exclusive selecting for L-monomers. It is a known thermodynamic fact that Dead organisms decay into component monomers, not the other way around.



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:23 AM
link   
But what's that got to do with anything?

You're right we don't actually know how life began. There are hypotheses that many consider likely but they haven't been proven.

"God did it" provides no meaningful understanding of the process, and does not expand our knowledge of the universe at all. Hence why it isn't an acceptable answer. Unless of course you can prove it in a method that can be replicated and tested.
edit on 312024 by Ohanka because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: cooperton
Nothing is magic for a Being that transcends time and space.

But it is what we would call magic.

So you believe in one magic over the other.



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: FlyersFan
The premise of this thread has been completely destroyed.

The Noahs Ark myth has been thoroughly dismantled.

Can the thread now die?

that was not the original op




It is already popular belief that a mass extinction event at some time in history wiped out a majority of the life on the planet, and there is good reason to believe it was a global flood.



The flood story has not dismantled. Much evidence has been provided to back the story up from various sources including the story of Noah..




posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik

But it is what we would call magic.

So you believe in one magic over the other.


You call magic what you can't comprehend, I call it intelligence because even though i dont understand it i know it creates intelligence.



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ohanka

"God did it" provides no meaningful understanding of the process, and does not expand our knowledge of the universe at all. Hence why it isn't an acceptable answer. Unless of course you can prove it in a method that can be replicated and tested.


Is "time and random chance did it" any better? Absolutely not. It is clear we live in an intelligently contrived body and material interface.


It is absolutely unintelligent, by its own definition, to suppose this world came to be without intelligence
edit on 3-1-2024 by cooperton because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:39 AM
link   
a reply to: cooperton
You call it intelligence just to make a semantic argument that it isn't magic.



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:43 AM
link   
a reply to: purplemer

Where is this ""much evidence"" that backs up Noah's magic boat story or indicates there was ever a global flood?

And remember your goalpost is 2000 BCE not 12000 BCE.



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Kurokage

You mean the ones that made it off alive.

Stuff being on that ""Love Boat"".


Might explain what happened to the poor dinosaurs, unicorns, and griffin i suppose.
edit on 3-1-2024 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: cooperton
You call it intelligence just to make a semantic argument that it isn't magic.


Well, You call it unintelligent to say it isn't magic. That's literally abiogenesis and evolutionary theory: "we don't understand it, but it was definitely an unintelligent process".

Literally The most unintelligent origin theory of all time. Even a flying spaghetti monster has a higher probability for origins, because at least it is, presumably, a sentient being capable of making decisions.

The fact that so many people believe evolution makes it no wonder that so many were vehement flat earth supporters in 1500s Europe, you all blindly believe the "experts" of the time and mock and ridicule any form of dissent no matter how much evidence is put forth.
edit on 3-1-2024 by cooperton because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 10:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: cooperton
Well, You call it unintelligent to say it isn't magic.

Can't keep the argument straight?


You call magic what you can't comprehend, I call it intelligence


ETA: By the way what we can't comprehend I call unknown.
edit on 3-1-2024 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 11:01 AM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake




Where is this ""much evidence"" that backs up Noah's magic boat story or indicates there was ever a global flood? And remember your goalpost is 2000 BCE not 12000 BCE


Dont be obtuse its been demonstrated the very story of noah is older and based on sumerian mythos. Meaning it cannot be 2000 bc.. but actually older.

Yet somehow you get stuck here. probably easier for you to do that than your narrative be incorrect.



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: cooperton

"no matter how much evidence is put forth."

Like, what evidence?

The Bible? LOL!



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 11:03 AM
link   
a reply to: purplemer

You on about your talking fish again?



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 11:05 AM
link   
a reply to: cooperton

Nobody (who actually mattered) believed the Earth was flat in 1500s Europe. The shape of the Earth has been known since the 5th Century BC.

Your Ancient Hebrews who wrote the old testament that you take as fact however did not know this and wrote that the Earth is held up on a bunch of pillars.
edit on 312024 by Ohanka because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 3 2024 @ 11:09 AM
link   
a reply to: purplemer

Well if its not 2000 BCE that's the Noah's Ark tale and global flood myths out the window.

As you have been made aware the younger dryas did not constitute a global flood nether.

Obtuse has nothing to do with the fact you are still unable to provide tangible evidence to back up the claims or support those made here in this thread.

I do not have a narrative, just facts, history, and science, on my side.
edit on 3-1-2024 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
36
<< 68  69  70    72  73  74 >>

log in

join