Miss Universe Competition to Include at Least Two Trans Contestants

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

First of all, those men chose to be there. They are choosing to objectify and sexualize themselves.

Secondly, at this point it's a woke contest not a beauty contest. If they win it will be because they are trans not because they actually won. And, if they lose their will be an uproar because they didn't win for being trans. The directors of this contest put the noose on their own neck for this one.

Lastly, it's not me that is affected. The precedent set by them allowing this mockery to go forward is the real problem. Further and further diminishing, and skewing, the definition of what a women is and making a mockery of who the real women are.

By observing your posting behaviour whenever a transgender subject arises here on ATS, it most definitely is you that is affected, why? I still don't understand because it affects you 'nadda'.

The Miss Universe organizers are the ones who created the definition of what a contestant is/should be and within those criteria are that transwomen have to be fully transitioned. Do you know what fully transitioned means?

"Do you know what fully transitioned means?"

No such thing exists.
It's only possible in the minds of gender ideologues and trans activists.

You need to do more research on what fully transitioned is in reality because learning what it actually has become will surprise you.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Love that made up, nonsensical, phrase you keep using.

A differing opinion other than yours is not bashing anyone.

Transgendered people would disagree with you and actually have here but were bullied away.

I'm predicting the winner will be 'stunning and brave'

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Thanks for stalking me, makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside knowing you are that obsessed with me


There you go with that objective reality bs again. The organizers will have set for a precedent that will make REAL women not want to compete, for the fear of being overlooked because of the "brave man" that took their beauty contest from them.

There is no such thing as "full transitioned". A man will always be a man, no matter how big he makes his breasts, how much of his wang he cuts off, how long he grows his hair, or how much make up he puts on.

Just because we visit the same themed threads does not make it stalking and I don't reply to you first, you always chase after me, now why is that?

As I advised Muldar, research as to what fully transitioned really entails you too will be surprised. But you won't and neither will Muldar because denying ignorance is not the objective here, now is it?

a reply to: quintessentone

I see you have still not defined what a women is, now why is that?

Do you not know what a women is?

If I put on a dress and say I am a women, that makes me one right? '


You would be surprised at how much it takes to get on my nerves pal. some nobody on the internet means absolutely nothing to me. Don't flatter yourself

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

I see you have still not defined what a women is, now why is that?

Do you not know what a women is?

If I put on a dress and say I am a women, that makes me one right? '


You would be surprised at how much it takes to get on my nerves pal. some nobody on the internet means absolutely nothing to me. Don't flatter yourself

The question should be what is the definition of a biologically born woman vs. a fully transitioned transwoman and, again, that would require everyone concerned? to do the actual research because it is very surprising.

The next question should be who has the freedom to further define what criteria is acceptable for transwomen to be allowed into their contests, sports, clubs, groups etc.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Who, where, and when?

Oh, that's right. I am such an internet bully for saying things that are on my mind and having an opinion. How hateful of me.

I have not bullied anyone, especially into leaving ATS. Again, you are so full of sh it.

If someone left here, that is of their own accord.

Not true, I've gotten pms from some people complaining, not about you specifically, just the whole atmosphere of bullying and hate. This is a far right site after all and toxicity should be expected because...hate, fear, bias etc.

a reply to: quintessentone

Deflection ,deflection, deflection.

That seems to be your favorite verb

The fact that you have to make a definition for a real women vs a fake one makes my point even clearer.


I would venture to guess that 99% of the "trans" going to women sports and other womens only contests, are only doing it because they can't compete in the men's divisions. Go and take a look at all of these "new women" showing up in women's sports and look at their stats as men. The relation in failed mens athletes to "trans" athletes is staggering. But you don;t want to look at those numbers

a reply to: quintessentone

I'm sure you have.......


If it is such a far right site full of hate, why are you still here? Are you telling us all that you are far right?

This site is only what you want to see it as, there is that pesky perceived/objective reality thing again.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

Deflection ,deflection, deflection.

That seems to be your favorite verb

The fact that you have to make a definition for a real women vs a fake one makes my point even clearer.


I would venture to guess that 99% of the "trans" going to women sports and other womens only contests, are only doing it because they can't compete in the men's divisions. Go and take a look at all of these "new women" showing up in women's sports and look at their stats as men. The relation in failed mens athletes to "trans" athletes is staggering. But you don;t want to look at those numbers

My research shows transwomen in only certain types of woman's sports have to follow strict criteria and regulations, again it's up to the organizers of these groups, it's not up to anyone else.

One person's deflection is another person's hitting the nail on the head where the other whines about it being deflection.

The focus here should be on the objectification and sexualization of women and girls, but NO, transgendered people take precedent in the evils of society. It's disgusting.

a reply to: quintessentone

You not answering, and avoiding, questions asked to you is deflection. We have bene over this bud, and you yourself even get after people for dodging and avoiding questions. Yet, here you are doing it all over again.

Again. These women, and men, have chosen to do these events. They are objectifying and sexualizing themselves.

If it was an issue for them, they wouldn't be there doing what they are doing.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

You not answering, and avoiding, questions asked to you is deflection. We have bene over this bud, and you yourself even get after people for dodging and avoiding questions. Yet, here you are doing it all over again.

Again. These women, and men, have chosen to do these events. They are objectifying and sexualizing themselves.

If it was an issue for them, they wouldn't be there doing what they are doing.

I answered all your questions, you just don't like the answers or glossed over my replies. Typical.

The wider extended issue is the objectification, exploitation and sexualization of children in these types of pageants, which everyone want to turn a blind eye to, is my ongoing 'deflection?' as you call it.

Certainly not as important as the ongoing outrage for two transwomen who fulfilled all of the contest's criteria as contestants. The outrage is clear, no inclusivity or tolerance for transpeople in any way shape or form should be allowed in society, isn't that right?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

First of all, those men chose to be there. They are choosing to objectify and sexualize themselves.

Secondly, at this point it's a woke contest not a beauty contest. If they win it will be because they are trans not because they actually won. And, if they lose their will be an uproar because they didn't win for being trans. The directors of this contest put the noose on their own neck for this one.

Lastly, it's not me that is affected. The precedent set by them allowing this mockery to go forward is the real problem. Further and further diminishing, and skewing, the definition of what a women is and making a mockery of who the real women are.

By observing your posting behaviour whenever a transgender subject arises here on ATS, it most definitely is you that is affected, why? I still don't understand because it affects you 'nadda'.

The Miss Universe organizers are the ones who created the definition of what a contestant is/should be and within those criteria are that transwomen have to be fully transitioned. Do you know what fully transitioned means?

"Do you know what fully transitioned means?"

No such thing exists.
It's only possible in the minds of gender ideologues and trans activists.

You need to do more research on what fully transitioned is in reality because learning what it actually has become will surprise you.

Research?

That's laughable. There is no research on a debunked political ideology.

a reply to: quintessentone

I asked you what a women was and you avoided, as per usual.

You went on to saying "The question should be what is the definition of a biologically born woman vs. a fully transitioned transwoman". That is not answering a simple question, that is avoidance because you can't even tell me what a women is.


THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT CHILDREN!!!!!!

I don't care what your fetish with children is, stop trying to make this thread about them. If you want a thread on that, make one, easy as that.