Miss Universe Competition to Include at Least Two Trans Contestants

a reply to: DBCowboy

If one of them win, just furthers the point that men are better at things than women.

I mean look at Caitlyn Jenner, won woman of the year after only "being one" for a few months.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: DBCowboy

If one of them win, just furthers the point that men are better at things than women.

I mean look at Caitlyn Jenner, won woman of the year after only "being one" for a few months.

Gals best be back in the kitchen makin' sammiches.

Let the men win the beauty pageants and sports competitions.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

You are still the only one trying to make this thread about the sexualization of children. Children are not a part of the Miss Universe pageant.

Women choose to do these pageants and if that makes them feel good about themselves, who are you to judge? If this is sexualizing women, again they chose to do this, maybe they don't mind it. Again, who are you to tell them what they can and can 't do?

The purpose of this "trans thread" is to point out the fact that men dressing up as women are trying to be Miss Universe. Playing into these peoples delusions only further their disturbed mental state and does nothing to help them.

I am well aware of the "deviant and perverted society", I see you post this BS all the time. But again, there was no reason to bring "children sex dolls" into a thread that is not about children, or sex dolls. How off topic of you.

I am good at way more than that, and it's not bashing unless it's not true. A man cannot be a women, and a women cannot be a man. Simple science, even kindergartners know this. Why is it taking you so long to understand this?

Willful ignorance is not a good look on you

There are other members in this thread that are pointing out the objectification and sexualization of women and children, go back to page one and start reading onwards.

The purpose of this trans thread is to bash, go back to page one and start reading, start with the second sly backhanded belittling comment after the OP under the guise as a bad joke. If the pageant organizers consider these transwomen as women, who are you to say otherwise? And for what's it worth there are strict criteria for transwomen who have to fit into that 'what a woman is' criteria for them.

There is every reason to bring up any type perversion or deviancy within society to show how these types of exploitative events can and do keep the sexual abuse of women and children on the rise. Bring it out of the dark, into the light, then deal with it.

Well, obviously a man can be a woman in the Miss Universe contest, so your argument fails right on that point alone.

originally posted by: quintessentone
obviously a man can be a woman in the Miss Universe contest,

Which many think is ridiculous.
The contest itself is ridiculous as well.
Pretty outdated, IMHO.
But as I said, I suppose there are those who still think it's relevant somehow.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
obviously a man can be a woman in the Miss Universe contest,

Which many think is ridiculous.
The contest itself is ridiculous as well.
Pretty outdated, IMHO.
But as I said, I suppose there are those who still think it's relevant somehow.

Absolutely, the whole event is ridiculous and if they want to bring in ex-machina robots in g-string bikinis and sex dolls that look 16 years of age then that's up to them, be inclusive and diverse but include everyone and everything.

Easy way to stop the blokes - no surgery of any kind allowed.

Only absolute natural goddesses such as Ali Rose, Natali Andreeva, greatmoongirl, or bitchinbubba are allowed to enter.

Although a competition encompassing beauty is rather silly. They are all #1!

Babes, gals, chicks, let me man 'splain since I can do it better than women. . . .

Y'all just need to calm down, bake something, wear a damned apron (though men do look better in them) and be second-best to us real men.

'Kay?

Any broad who disagrees must be on her "monthly".

originally posted by: quintessentone
There is every reason to bring up any type perversion or deviancy within society to show how these types of exploitative events can and do keep the sexual abuse of women and children on the rise. Bring it out of the dark, into the light, then deal with it.

Women could argue that these events are empowering to women.

Unless the women are being forced into, it's not exploitative.

originally posted by: baggy7981

originally posted by: quintessentone
There is every reason to bring up any type perversion or deviancy within society to show how these types of exploitative events can and do keep the sexual abuse of women and children on the rise. Bring it out of the dark, into the light, then deal with it.

Women could argue that these events are empowering to women.

Unless the women are being forced into, it's not exploitative.

Women can enter beauty pageants and convince themselves of anything they want, it's their choice. How does being judged on one's appearance in a skimpy bikini empower a woman if only to empower her to use her body to get what she wants?

My problem, as with other members on this thread, is the sexualization, exploitation and objectification viewpoint which also extends to children's pageants, and it also rearing it's ugly head in social media, corporate advertising/marketing and pornography.

originally posted by: baggy7981

originally posted by: quintessentone
There is every reason to bring up any type perversion or deviancy within society to show how these types of exploitative events can and do keep the sexual abuse of women and children on the rise. Bring it out of the dark, into the light, then deal with it.

Women could argue that these events are empowering to women.

Unless the women are being forced into, it's not exploitative.

to be honest only fans exists for a reason.. content creators tend to make more money than the [no pun intended] professional class..

originally posted by: FlyersFan

Which many think is ridiculous.
The contest itself is ridiculous as well.
Pretty outdated, IMHO.
But as I said, I suppose there are those who still think it's relevant somehow.

If it's irrelevant, why are you starting a thread about it?

Oh yeah, I forgot. Tranny bashing. Carry on.

originally posted by: LordAhriman
If it's irrelevant, why are you starting a thread about it?

Did you read the opening post? "I have never understood beauty contests. But I suppose they still have their place in society." That's why it's being discussed.

Oh yeah, I forgot. Tranny bashing. Carry on.

Oh yeah, I never bashed 'trannys' once. Carry on. Pffft.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: LordAhriman
If it's irrelevant, why are you starting a thread about it?

Did you read the opening post? "I have never understood beauty contests. But I suppose they still have their place in society." That's why it's being discussed.

Oh yeah, I forgot. Tranny bashing. Carry on.

Oh yeah, I never bashed 'trannys' once. Carry on. Pffft.

Don't worry about it too much, that's their way of saying they have no actual argument for what you're saying in your thread. It's also coming form those who can't define what a real women is.

a reply to: FlyersFan

I careless about beauty contest, I do not watch them, but this is more than just beauty contest, this about males of the species taking another more of what used to be just roles for women only, a man is not a female and never will be.

Is incredible that nobody else see the irony of the whole trans situation, darn it people doesn't you get it, men are mutilating themselves to be like us females, they want to replacing us completely, competing with us, is just darn weird.

What in the heck is with men these days, they just can no handle been men anymore.

As women they will no be able to handle it either, failed mutilated men in skirts, is just soo ridiculous is borders on mental sickness.

originally posted by: PorkChop96

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: LordAhriman
If it's irrelevant, why are you starting a thread about it?

Did you read the opening post? "I have never understood beauty contests. But I suppose they still have their place in society." That's why it's being discussed.

Oh yeah, I forgot. Tranny bashing. Carry on.

Oh yeah, I never bashed 'trannys' once. Carry on. Pffft.

Don't worry about it too much, that's their way of saying they have no actual argument for what you're saying in your thread. It's also coming form those who can't define what a real women is.

The Miss Universe organizers are the ones that defined and put forth criteria of what a female contestant is as for anybody else thinks, it's clear why threads like these are created.

originally posted by: quintessentone
it's clear why threads like these are created.

yeah, for people to give their opinion on a topic.
People may not like other people's opinions, but tough knuckles.

a reply to: quintessentone

My point still stands

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
it's clear why threads like these are created.

yeah, for people to give their opinion on a topic.
People may not like other people's opinions, but tough knuckles.

Transpeople bashing is not in any shape or form near an opinion, unless it's defined as fear turned into hate speech opining.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

My point still stands

It does not stand with the Miss Universe organizers.

This thread is worthless without pics!

I wish these two ladies the best of luck in the competition.