Knew This Was Coming

originally posted by: frogs453
Hey again I have no issues with birth certificates. If there are laws that they cannot play. I don't have an issue with that. I do have issues that any parent can make a claim and harass any kid. Just because their own kid lost or they don't like how a child looks and then subject that kid to further inspection.

And for someone who said I'm projecting, I'll not stray off topic too much but yeah we've definitely seen posts that were very adamant about certain things, yet when those laws or consequences affected people they agreed with, there is all this shock and outrage. Even though some may have pointed it out previously that it was not good. But, since they didn't like the people it was happening to, it was all good then to them.

Sure, it's all good to them because they are anti-trans, so harming children, even children that were thought to be trans but turned out not to be...it's all good...it was for a good cause...to save the children. Never mind that all the children at the sporting event had to view the ugly face of hate and intolerance.

a reply to: DBCowboy


This is just like other comments I read here. People insisting that a pride display or any talk of LBGTQ means they have to tell their young children about the sexual behaviors of LGBTQ people. What? Why would you in your example state that now means you have to explain sex between two same sex people? Do you explain it when Aunt Sue is dating or marrying Bob? No, you don't, you just explain that they love each other, a man and a woman, or (gasp!)two men. They may marry(the horror!).

You can explain this without sexual details. I mean unless you're explaining details about hetero couples too, but that's weird. A young child would be grossed out to hear if it's you and mom or uncles Bill and Ted.


So if there is a book like the one that has been banned about two real penguins both male raising a young one, a book where a kid has 2 moms, no one has to explain sex. But they certainly can teach its ok to be different and love one another. That's so horrible to teach? If you don't, you end up with people screaming at gay people, or knocking down pride displays, or violence against them.

a reply to: frogs453

I have next door neighbors. A gay couple. Great guys. They always come over when I smoke a brisket. We exchange Christmas gifts during the holidays.

They are great guys.

The only difference between me and either one is that I have sex with a woman. My wife. They are men and have sex with each other.

There is no other difference.

They work, they drink beer, we #-talk each other on football.

They are our friends.

Now if there is no difference between me and my neighbors other than whom we have sex with and how, then why even bring it up?

a reply to: JAGStorm

Just so you know, when you get a sports related physical as a boy/man the doctor actually touches yer nuts - "turn your head and cough". It's standard procedure.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: frogs453

I have next door neighbors. A gay couple. Great guys. They always come over when I smoke a brisket. We exchange Christmas gifts during the holidays.

They are great guys.

The only difference between me and either one is that I have sex with a woman. My wife. They are men and have sex with each other.

There is no other difference.

They work, they drink beer, we #-talk each other on football.

They are our friends.

Now if there is no difference between me and my neighbors other than whom we have sex with and how, then why even bring it up?

It is never brought up to children in a school environment, that concept was invented so as to weaponize children for their hate agenda.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: frogs453

I have next door neighbors. A gay couple. Great guys. They always come over when I smoke a brisket. We exchange Christmas gifts during the holidays.

They are great guys.

The only difference between me and either one is that I have sex with a woman. My wife. They are men and have sex with each other.

There is no other difference.

They work, they drink beer, we #-talk each other on football.

They are our friends.

Now if there is no difference between me and my neighbors other than whom we have sex with and how, then why even bring it up?

It is never brought up to children in a school environment, that concept was invented so as to weaponize children for their hate agenda.

Jesus Christ stop your damned lying. There have been numerous examples of anal sex, oral sex taught to children.

Just quit your god-damned lying.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: knoxie

just silly Canadians being silly.

No, just transphobia taking a firm foothold there and in the U.S.A. Here is news quite a number of you will be happy to read.

www.scmp.com...

What? People not wanting abnormal, mentally ill people mingling with or brainwashing their children? Say it ain't so. How terrible.

Rather keeping anti-trans haters who persecute others for being different.

wait till they find out the truth about brittney griner and the original birth certificate

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: frogs453

I have next door neighbors. A gay couple. Great guys. They always come over when I smoke a brisket. We exchange Christmas gifts during the holidays.

They are great guys.

The only difference between me and either one is that I have sex with a woman. My wife. They are men and have sex with each other.

There is no other difference.

They work, they drink beer, we #-talk each other on football.

They are our friends.

Now if there is no difference between me and my neighbors other than whom we have sex with and how, then why even bring it up?

It is never brought up to children in a school environment, that concept was invented so as to weaponize children for their hate agenda.

Jesus Christ stop your damned lying. There have been numerous examples of anal sex, oral sex taught to children.

Just quit your god-damned lying.

Post the examples...show us the proof. I won't be waiting for it.

a reply to: datguy

A child in that middle school (Grades 7 & 8) can not just take the book out of the library they need their parent's consent. If the parent's say it's okay then it's none of your business.

"Students' reading selections from the library media center are always at the discretion of the student and their family," HCPS told TND. "Should a family or community member have a concern regarding a library media center material or library media center list, the school's library media specialist is available to hear those concerns, and if requested, provide custom reading recommendations based on the students interests and family's priorities. If desired, the library media specialist can also provide information on the HCPS Reconsideration of School Media Materials procedures."

www.tampabay.com...

As well, they have an opt out process any parent can take advantage of if they disagree with the educaton.

www.canva.com... button

local12.com...

The library contends that the sexual content is age appropriate.

When the topic first surfaced in Hillsborough, school board chairperson Nadia Combs spoke out strongly against the book critics, saying children are in much more danger from materials and websites that they can access on their smartphones.

www.tampabay.com...

All children are taught sex education in different age appropriate formats.

The outrage, as usual, is only with LGBTQ is involved. I wonder which sex education books featuring heterosexual content is overlooked.

a reply to: quintessentone

Also the chapter in that book begins with:

This chapter is about sex. Therefore it has sex in it. WELL, DUH. If you are a younger reader and you feel you aren't ready for the finer details of same-sex pairings, then simply skip this whole chapter.

HOWEVER, before you do, I'd like to remind you that we taught you all about straight sex when you were ELEVEN YEARS OLD during sixth grade. The fact that they didn't also teach you what same-sex couples do is nothing less than institutionalized homophobia.

Exactly, heterosexual acts is okay to teach even younger children, but LGBTQ sex - oh nos.

a reply to: quintessentone

So you finally admit that you want to teach young children about gay and lesbian sex.

It took a couple of pages, but now you admit it.

Leave the children alone.

a reply to: quintessentone

Oddly enough the graphic book? Not one complaint regarding the girl on girl sex in the book from what I read. Just the males. Hmm.. guess that must be OK.

And I'll tell you what, if a kid is searching out a book in the library to just look at pictures of sex, I'm guessing they don't have a phone, laptop or computer. Because it's everywhere. It's on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram not to mention any free porn site. I heard from my teens about kids sending others the grossest graphic videos to each other as a joke.

To me that's a huge problem. I had girls and frank discussions so it wasn't an issue in my house, but these young boys watching porn at a young age and so much of it, definitely warps what they think sex should be. Because it isn't the pizza guy or plumber immediately getting a b*** job from his customer, or that women want to be constantly treated like a sex toy.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: quintessentone

So you finally admit that you want to teach young children about gay and lesbian sex.

It took a couple of pages, but now you admit it.

Leave the children alone.

This is what the experts are saying ... 'teach them well'...

The issue of a widely inconsistent and generally lacking sexual education curriculum, both nationally and internationally, is becoming more and more relevant. Rates of sexual violence victimization are not decreasing, but instead have been increasing, even in the context of substantial non-reporting (Smith et al., 2018; Morgan & Oudekerk, 2018; CDC, 2019). The purpose of drawing attention to the improvement of existing sexual education curricula is to decrease rates of sexual violence victimization in the future. The implementation of evidence-based comprehensive programs has shown positive results in prior studies, in that the risk-taking behaviors of youth decreased (Planned Parenthood, 2016). A review of current state legislation indicates, however, at least half of the nation receives limited to no sexual education in K-12 public schools (Planned Parenthood, 2016; Leung et al., 2019; NCSL, 2020).

This educational gap deprives K-12 students from learning about proper sexual health, healthy sexual interactions, the meaning and importance of consent, healthy relationships, sexuality, gender discussions, the significance of behavior, and more (Shegog, Baulmer, Addy, Peskin, & Thiel, 2017; Schmidt, Wandersman, & Hills, 2015; Shapiro & Brown, 2018; Leung et al., 2019; NCSL, 2020). The lack of action to enact new legislation, which could enhance sex education curricula, reduces the likelihood of declines in sexual victimization, including at the developmental stages for K-12 students (Mallet, 2017; CDC, 2019; Leung et al., 2019; NCSL, 2020; Shapiro & Brown, 2018; Smith, Park, Ireland, Elwyn, & Thornberry, 2013).

www.ebpsociety.org...#:~:text=Knowledge%20is%20power%2C%20and%2 0nearly,2019%3B%20NCSL%2C%202020).

originally posted by: shooterbrody

Oh
It appears you are angry that sex is a fact and can be verified by a birth certificate?
You know, like they use for age in little league?
Kids get challenged for age all the time.
Why get salty about checking sex?

Is it a question not allowed?

But age is?


What kind of insanity is this?

It is sad that parents feel the need to question if the school is allowing males to compete with females. Go back like 2 years and this would never have been a thought, so who is in the wrong here? People keep trying to put the blame on the "anti-trans" agenda without understanding it is all pushback and not an assault. The assault is coming from the Woke progressives that push all this crap in the first place,

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: quintessentone

Oddly enough the graphic book? Not one complaint regarding the girl on girl sex in the book from what I read. Just the males. Hmm.. guess that must be OK.

And I'll tell you what, if a kid is searching out a book in the library to just look at pictures of sex, I'm guessing they don't have a phone, laptop or computer. Because it's everywhere. It's on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram not to mention any free porn site. I heard from my teens about kids sending others the grossest graphic videos to each other as a joke.

To me that's a huge problem. I had girls and frank discussions so it wasn't an issue in my house, but these young boys watching porn at a young age and so much of it, definitely warps what they think sex should be. Because it isn't the pizza guy or plumber immediately getting a b*** job from his customer, or that women want to be constantly treated like a sex toy.

It is a huge problem and if a middle school child is looking to educate themselves as to the realities of sex and consent by sneaking around a library to find out, then that shows the problems with toxic parenting.

a reply to: quintessentone

Leave the children alone.

Let parents decide.

Unless you think children can drink, smoke, drive, get tattoos, vote, enlist, etc.