Supreme Court Draft Decision Would Strike Down Roe v. Wade

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: TheRedneck

Whatever, as I answered DB, it won't stop the bitching. It won't stop reproductive rights activists from protesting.

If abortion rights is an oxymoron then so is reproductive rights.

originally posted by: TheRedneck
Seems to have worked well for the DNC... just sayin'.

last time I looked they won the last election.

a reply to: vonclod

Is your wife "many"..or just one

You are flying off the handle lately

I tend to do that when people suggest I should be chemically castrated for being born male.

Call it a personality flaw.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: carewemust
gettr.com...

Yea!... no more (legal) baby murders.

Not what it says... at all... it simply relegates the question back to where it belongs - the States.

LOL. Catching up on all the dudes telling the women here they are behaving irrationally.

Good luck with that, if it doesn't work at home I'm pretty sure you won't get any traction with that here.

originally posted by: marg6043
This not about killing fetuses, is about the women rights to their own bodies. But hey call it whatever you want.

Ok, you're wrong, it is about killing unborn babies.

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Sookiechacha

You did realize that there are also STATE LEGISLATURES? Literally, there are 50 of them, composed of elected officials, one for every state!

I cannot believe i am having to explain this...

TheRedneck

You shouldnt be, its the people who dont understand this sort of thing that are all up in arms

They want the right to kill babies for whatever reason they see fit, PERIOD everything else is just straw man from them and emotional tantrums

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: JinMI

Roe v wade was about keeping government out of abortion decisions... over ruling it gives more power to government.

Just... no. It is removing the power from the feds, and sending it back to the States where it belongs (and where it was before 1973).

originally posted by: optimisticcontrarian

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Sookiechacha

You did realize that there are also STATE LEGISLATURES? Literally, there are 50 of them, composed of elected officials, one for every state!

I cannot believe i am having to explain this...

TheRedneck

You shouldnt be, its the people who dont understand this sort of thing that are all up in arms

They want the right to kill babies for whatever reason they see fit, PERIOD everything else is just straw man from them and emotional tantrums

There's that thing about "women behaving irrationally" Augustus just mentioned a few posts ago.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: TheRedneck

Whatever, as I answered DB, it won't stop the bitching. It won't stop reproductive rights activists from protesting.

If abortion rights is an oxymoron then so is reproductive rights.

No reproductive rights is not an oxy moron

Abortion rights is, because it removes the right to life, its exactly like saying "My Murder Rights"

If this is hard to understand then I dont know what to tell you, you can reason with ignorant people, because theyre ignorant of the info

You cant reason with stupid people because you cant pour facts into their brain, stupid is forever

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

LOL. Catching up on all the dudes telling the women here they are behaving irrationally.

ahh going for the ol "Im a male and I need femenism" schtick eh?

Go as those basement dwellers who wore the shirts around for the last few years, it wont help you get women, you just look weak

Roe v. Wade is deep in the bucket of the worst decisions ever made by the SC. There are others mind you and each one was overturned in good time, as this one should be too. I'm not really for or against abortions as I see +- on both sides of the argument, but the big part is the SC stepped outside of the Constitution when they took the right away from the States to decide.

The bottom-line is whether you believe abortions are right or wrong is not the point here as to why the SC did something they really had no right doing.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: optimisticcontrarian

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Sookiechacha

You did realize that there are also STATE LEGISLATURES? Literally, there are 50 of them, composed of elected officials, one for every state!

I cannot believe i am having to explain this...

TheRedneck

You shouldnt be, its the people who dont understand this sort of thing that are all up in arms

They want the right to kill babies for whatever reason they see fit, PERIOD everything else is just straw man from them and emotional tantrums

There's that thing about "women behaving irrationally" Augustus just mentioned a few posts ago.

Suggesting men should be castrated because they are born male, as some sort of really effed up correlation to on demand killing of babies is INDEED acting irrationally

If you cant see that, youre beyond help

originally posted by: Xtrozero
Roe v. Wade is deep in the bucket of the worst decisions ever made by the SC. There are others mind you and each one was overturned in good time, as this one should be too. I'm not really for or against abortions as I see +- on both sides of the argument, but the big part is the SC stepped outside of the Constitution when they took the right away from the States to decide.

The bottom-line is whether you believe abortions are right or wrong is not the point here as to why the SC did something they really had no right doing.

Bingo Bango

originally posted by: optimisticcontrarian

No reproductive rights is not an oxy moron

Abortion rights is, because it removes the right to life, its exactly like saying "My Murder Rights"

If this is hard to understand then I dont know what to tell you, you can reason with ignorant people, because theyre ignorant of the info

You cant reason with stupid people because you cant pour facts into their brain, stupid is forever

Not really a good point unless you believe at conception, no matter what, the baby has rights that can not be taken away. No morning after pill, no abortion for health, incest, rape, deformities detected etc etc.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Page 67

‘We end this opinion where we began. Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives.

The judgment of the Fifth Circuit is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

That follows the wording of the 10th Amendment I posted earlier (since you seem completely unable to read anything yourself) and specifies "the citizens of each State."

Please learn to read. It is not my responsibility to spoon feed you every single word. I'm not your Mommy or Daddy.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: Xtrozero
Roe v. Wade is deep in the bucket of the worst decisions ever made by the SC. There are others mind you and each one was overturned in good time, as this one should be too. I'm not really for or against abortions as I see +- on both sides of the argument, but the big part is the SC stepped outside of the Constitution when they took the right away from the States to decide.

The bottom-line is whether you believe abortions are right or wrong is not the point here as to why the SC did something they really had no right doing.

That much I can agree with. It's a state level policy that should be determined per the democratic will of constituents residing in respective districts.

originally posted by: optimisticcontrarian

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: optimisticcontrarian

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Sookiechacha

You did realize that there are also STATE LEGISLATURES? Literally, there are 50 of them, composed of elected officials, one for every state!

I cannot believe i am having to explain this...

TheRedneck

You shouldnt be, its the people who dont understand this sort of thing that are all up in arms

They want the right to kill babies for whatever reason they see fit, PERIOD everything else is just straw man from them and emotional tantrums

There's that thing about "women behaving irrationally" Augustus just mentioned a few posts ago.

Suggesting men should be castrated because they are born male, as some sort of really effed up correlation to on demand killing of babies is INDEED acting irrationally

If you cant see that, youre beyond help

One dramatic reaction deserves another, that's why the mud pit forum was invented. It's a hot button topic and these moods are not unexpected.

a reply to: TheRedneck

You did know you have a state legislature?

Did you know that, when in conflict, federal law supersedes state law?

Of course, we're talking about Schumer and Pelosi, right?

Republican senators have met to discuss legislation that would ban abortion nationwide, Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) told the Post, and Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) would reportedly likely introduce the bill.

LINK

Both Republicans and Democrats seem to think that they can federally legislate abortion.

originally posted by: SideEyeEverything
Why do you assume that all women who have abortions do so because they are forced to rather than perhaps they don't give AF about anything but themselves?

Every pro-abortion argument assumes:
the woman is helpless
the woman is blameless
the woman was somehow coerced into either having sex or having the baby
the woman is in danger, health wise or domestically

It is hard to stomach that some women just might be careless, selfish or simply don't want to deal with the consequences of their own "female empowerment", isn't it?

Are those the people you want becoming mothers? Are they all suddenly going to become unselfish?

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

That's what I meant.

TheRedneck