It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You asked for a citation, I gave one. 🐔
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: DBCowboy
How about you trade, gun laws for abortion laws.
Everybody wins, and everybody loses, but at least you get something that you want.
No.
I believe this is a human rights issue.
I also believe that the unborn human is, well, human.
But if we keep pushing the thought that the unborn humans aren't actually human beings, then it's easier to kill them.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: DBCowboy
Trouble is ... I've heard one to many people proclaiming that it's their absolute constitutional right to shoot a grown adult dead if they put a single foot on their property.
My solution, condoms, lots and lots of condoms.
originally posted by: loufo
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: DBCowboy
How about you trade, gun laws for abortion laws.
Everybody wins, and everybody loses, but at least you get something that you want.
No.
I believe this is a human rights issue.
I also believe that the unborn human is, well, human.
But if we keep pushing the thought that the unborn humans aren't actually human beings, then it's easier to kill them.
do human rights also apply to women who have an abortion for medical/psychological reasons?
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: DBCowboy
And then women won't be able to own property. And then women won't be able to vote. Hyperbole much?
Plan B is already being questioned in Texas so how is that hyperbole?
www.texastribune.org...
Video: South Texans adapt to near-total abortion ban with Plan B pills and trips out of state
Court decisions have gone back and forth on the ban’s enforceability over several weeks. While the law’s constitutionality is questioned, the Biden administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to stop enforcement of the ban. The high court will hear two legal challenges to the law beginning at 9 a.m. Monday. For now, the near-total abortion ban is still being enforced.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: LSU2018
The alternative is saying no, using a rubber, or buying a bottle of plan B for those crazy nights.
Listen to what you are saying, what do you think plan B is!
You think plan B is going to stick around?
As for rape and incest, that is part of this whole thing. These sickos don't think it's ok to have an abortion during those times either. Imagine your wife or daughter getting raped by a thug and your states law says you can't, and you also can't go to another state. So you have to watch in horror as your loved one grows this demon seed!
Yes I know this is not the majority of case, but it absolutely DOES happen. What about those people?
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: DBCowboy
And already it has begun.
(and so it begins. . . )
The de-humanization of the unborn human.
Because if you don't think of them as living, growing, humans, then you can do whatever you want to them.
Explain to me why impregnation is considered a human right and abortion isn't. By law, any consenting adult of any background with any qualification or lack thereof is granted the ability to reproduce but not the ability to terminate gestation. If I didn't know better, I'd say this isn't about enforcing family values but making sure the population stays at peak numbers regardless of how many children are removed and rehoused by the state. If abortion is unethical and borderline sinful because human rights, it reasonably follows that parenthood must be licensed and regulated by the state to ensure the maximum welfare of children nationwide...because human rights. Unless that kind of thing stops being relevant the moment they are born?
An unborn living human is just that; an unborn living human.
Now you and others can try to de-humanize the unborn living human, but wouldn't you be ignoring the science?
Just like LSU, you either didn't read my remarks because it's a waste of your precious time, or you put minimal thought and energy into your response because it's a waste of your precious time. Why bother at all.
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: peaceinoutz
Unfortunately it will not end abortion. It will end safe abortion. Abortion has been around for 1000s of years. It only became a big issue in the late 1800s due to a Christian push. A pope once outlawed it in the 1500s but another Pope removed that within 100 years.
Women openly discussed with others herbs and other ways to end a pregnancy. We will just see more deaths, inability to get pregnant again, etc.
If abortion were illegal here in Louisiana and my wife was raped and got pregnant, after I beat the guy within an inch of his life and stomp his nuts until there's nothing left, I'd improvise and drive her to the first available state to have a legal abortion.
Lawmakers in Missouri weighed legislation early this year that would allow individuals to sue anyone helping a patient cross state lines for an abortion. The law was ultimately blocked in the state’s legislature, but experts expect such legislation to gain more support if Roe is weakened or overturned.
Yes I know this is not the majority of case, but it absolutely DOES happen. What about those people?
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Sookiechacha
No you didn't. STOP deflecting and changing your narratives 🤣🤣🤣🤣
End of conversation 🤣🤣🤣🤣
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
Actually, show me. Please site from the draft where it absolutely hands women's reproductive rights exclusively to the states. Show me where the draft opinion bars the federal government through Congress from banning abortion or codifying Roe V Wade.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
Actually it absolutely is retruend to states right
Actually, show me. Please site from the draft where it absolutely hands women's reproductive rights exclusively to the states. Show me where the draft opinion bars the federal government through Congress from banning abortion or codifying Roe V Wade.
If this decision nullifies R v W, The States will automatically have their own authority to legislate because the Federal Laws are silent. 🚬