It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Supreme Court Draft Decision Would Strike Down Roe v. Wade

page: 48
46
<< 45  46  47   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 4 2023 @ 08:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: SourGrapes

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen
Rumors fueling up that the "Leaker" is a law clerk for Breyer !!

Elizabeth Deutsch 🚬 hmmmm


9.5.2022

The LEAKER was likely one of the Justices, because: www.washingtontimes.com...

The Supreme Court may have internal ties to the low-integrity DOJ-FBI. Most likely that "connection" would be Chief Justice Roberts.



Justice Roberts has already been compromised, as we witnessed with the "Healthcare is a tax" ruling.


9.9.2022

Justice Gorsuch says a "report" on the leak will be coming soon from the Supreme Court.

www.foxnews.com...



How many possible leakers were there? Just 16?

Our country has become too touchy-feely.

In China or Saudi Arabia or Russia, the leaker would have turned himself in long ago, rather than see everyone else be punished.



posted on Apr, 4 2023 @ 11:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: SourGrapes

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen
Rumors fueling up that the "Leaker" is a law clerk for Breyer !!

Elizabeth Deutsch 🚬 hmmmm


9.5.2022

The LEAKER was likely one of the Justices, because: www.washingtontimes.com...

The Supreme Court may have internal ties to the low-integrity DOJ-FBI. Most likely that "connection" would be Chief Justice Roberts.



Justice Roberts has already been compromised, as we witnessed with the "Healthcare is a tax" ruling.


9.9.2022

Justice Gorsuch says a "report" on the leak will be coming soon from the Supreme Court.

www.foxnews.com...



How many possible leakers were there? Just 16?

Our country has become too touchy-feely.

In China or Saudi Arabia or Russia, the leaker would have turned himself in long ago, rather than see everyone else be punished.


It may be that those who leaked are cowardly



posted on Apr, 28 2023 @ 07:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
Breaking.


Alito’s draft is labeled as a proposed majority opinion, though the wording of the court’s ultimate ruling and the line-up of justices who support it could change before final release, expected by late June or early July.


Source

Will add more soon

ETA

Daily Beast Source

Justice Alitos draft can be found in both sources. Some claiming it was a leak.

ETA: If what im reading is correct, a leak from the SCOTUS has never been done and this isnt due for a few months yet?

More games? Riots?


April 28, 2023

As we near the 1 year anniversary of the Roe-v-Wade leak, Justice Samuel Alito says the Justices are pretty certain who did it, but not certain enough to charge he/her yet.

Source: www.foxnews.com...

Only 16 people could have done it. After a year, the in-house investigators still aren't confident enough with their evidence to name the suspect.



edit on 4/28/2023 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 9 2023 @ 05:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: JinMI
Breaking.


Alito’s draft is labeled as a proposed majority opinion, though the wording of the court’s ultimate ruling and the line-up of justices who support it could change before final release, expected by late June or early July.


Source

Will add more soon

ETA

Daily Beast Source

Justice Alitos draft can be found in both sources. Some claiming it was a leak.

ETA: If what im reading is correct, a leak from the SCOTUS has never been done and this isnt due for a few months yet?

More games? Riots?


April 28, 2023

As we near the 1 year anniversary of the Roe-v-Wade leak, Justice Samuel Alito says the Justices are pretty certain who did it, but not certain enough to charge he/her yet.

Source: www.foxnews.com...

Only 16 people could have done it. After a year, the in-house investigators still aren't confident enough with their evidence to name the suspect.




I bet dollars to donuts they KNOW (or know enough to charge or whatever measures they use) who or how many were involved.

but because they are part of the "protected", particular party/agenda supporters, and/or the "end justifies the means" group they KNOW NOTHING CAN BE DONE.

maybe (just spit balling here) the reason two judges (who were hated from the very beginning of the nomination process) are now "suddenly accused" of financial impropriety is because they have the "information" and dont want them to in anyway spill it
or if they did to preemptively discredit them in advance
.

hmmm

scrounger



new topics

    top topics
     
    46
    << 45  46  47   >>

    log in

    join