It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: Cutepants
Nice Totenkopf insignia on the Russonazi's uniform.
Cheers
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: Cutepants
Nice Totenkopf insignia on the Russonazi's uniform.
Cheers
That is the DPR but for you to know that you would have needed to do your own research or payed attention the first time I pointed it out.
Have a nice day.
Nice Totenkopf insignia on the Russonazi's uniform.
Ukrainian military officials are enmeshed in a hotly contested debate over whether U.S.-provided Gray Eagle strike drones can be effective against increasingly resilient Russian air defenses, while the Biden administration considers providing Kyiv with the systems that became ubiquitous in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The risk of operating drones in Ukraine, which saw cheap strike drones like the Turkish Bayraktar have significant impact against the Russian military in the first days of the war, has increased as the fight has moved east to the Donbas region, which abuts Russia’s Western Military District and larger clusters of advanced air defense systems, such as S-300 and S-400 missile batteries.
But there is a split between front-line airmen and Ukraine’s chief of staff on the drones, according to multiple Ukrainian military officials, who recently spoke to Foreign Policy and other media outlets on condition of anonymity, identified only by their military call signs.
“We are not advocating for the Gray Eagles,” said one pilot, referred to as Moonfish. The Ukrainian military’s general staff, he said, are advocating for the drones. “There’s no good Air Force mind next to our chief of staff or commander who would say, speak up and say, hey, that’s B.S.”
“It’s very dangerous to use such expensive drones in our case, because of the enemy’s air defense,” he added. “It’s not Afghanistan here.”
originally posted by: Grimpachi
Ukraine has been targeting civilians in Donetsk for 8 years.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Xcathdra
Lie? No. I guess you don't know what a euphemism is.
Your claim is false, the picture is from 2018.
Apparently you don't know what research is before you lie about something.
So you say, and have said.
The International Criminal Court in The Hague has announced that it had sufficient grounds to begin an official investigation into war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Crimea and the Donbas since 2014, by the peaceful and love-spreading Russians. There's quite a file. ICC
Russia needs to take allegations of war crimes to the ICC or similar international bodies, otherwise, these periodic Russian accusations will be treated like everything that comes out of Russia - as propaganda and misinformation
Regardless, Russia has a chance to offer up evidence to the ICC. Will it be like all the non-evidence Russian tried to get included after they shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, or the bollocks they tried to offer up when they poisoned Litvinenko or the Skripals? No one trusts Russia any more. They are trapped in their own lies.
originally posted by: ufoorbhunter
Lukashenko in Russia for extensive talks with Putin eng.belta.by...