Russia Ukraine Update Thread

originally posted by: da pickles
a reply to: PatriotGames4u

Kitchen Independant reporting as ballistic missile

Definitely not a ballistic nuke. Without knowing the time and location, it could also be a fertilizer plant explosion or ammo dump. We just don’t know yet.

You ever see that fertilizer storage blow up a few years ago? Looked likes what a large thermobaric bomb looks like.

originally posted by: jedi_hamster

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: jedi_hamster

and all that you listed in Canada is no more when Trudeau lifted the emergency bs before parliament could pass it.

What else do you have?

afaik, it didn't end. that's the problem. some accounts are still frozen.

but hey, who gives a sh.t if someone can afford food if they have different opinion, right?

Damage was certainly done.

Tyrants have the ability to cause damage whenever they want.

Not paying attention.

Been saying.

a reply to: jedi_hamster

* - Canada unfreezes bank accounts linked to 'Freedom Convoy'

* - Trudeau Lifts Emergencies Act Just after Extension

The Canadian government announced Wednesday it will revoke the Emergencies Act after invoking it only nine days ago, acknowledging that there is no longer a crisis of civil disobedience with truckers protesting the cross-border vaccine mandate that requires such sweeping federal intervention.

So as not to derail the thread this is the last canada post I will answer. We can take that discussion to one of the canada threads if we wish.

a reply to: 38181

They have been launching Iskander "ballistic missiles" from Russian/Belorusian territory at Ukrainian targets. They are capable of carrying a nuke payload but as we have seen no nuke payloads on board.

a reply to: BigfootNZ

Thankfully there arent as many nukes as there were in the 80's... thankfully nuclear disarmament was taken seriously for a good long time even by Russia. Still enough around though on both sides to cause serious catastrophe should it happen... but im keeping optimistic and saying nuclear war wont happen.

Russia has about 3000 nukes, U.S. has about 2500, U.K. and France have about 500 between them.
All of these nukes have a greater yield than the ones in the 80's. Nuclear disarmament was never taken seriously.
Ukraine had the second biggest nuclear arsenal in the world. They agreed to give up them nuclear weapons in return for their independence.

a reply to: just4fun


Not about russian nukes you didn't.

Cause you think putin has the ability to use more than a handful of them before russian glass appears out of nowhere.

originally posted by: nolabel
They agreed to give up them nuclear weapons in return for their independence.

Independence and territorial integrity, including Crimea - something Russia agreed to. Russia violated the Budapest agreement and Ukraine is once again looking at building their own nukes.

originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
a reply to: just4fun


Not about russian nukes you didn't.

Cause you think putin has the ability to use more than a handful of them before russian glass appears out of nowhere.

Dont forget the Russian submarines. Pretty sure those would be at ready to launch status right now. I could be wrong though

originally posted by: nolabel
a reply to: BigfootNZ

Thankfully there arent as many nukes as there were in the 80's... thankfully nuclear disarmament was taken seriously for a good long time even by Russia. Still enough around though on both sides to cause serious catastrophe should it happen... but im keeping optimistic and saying nuclear war wont happen.

They agreed to give up them nuclear weapons in return for their independence.

Protection from russian invasion.

Ukraine gave up it's nukes in exchange for American promises to protect Ukraine from russian invasion.



Sorry guys, nobody on our side ever even considered the possibility that democrats would cheat a a FkIng idiot into the Whitehouse.

We're doing the best we can to help you, but biden is a World Class Idiot of the HIGHEST possible order.

We won't let that happen again.

originally posted by: just4fun
How the hell can you even say they are not trying to avoid civilian casualties?

Easy. By intentionally shooting civilians, that's how they're not trying to avoid civilian casualties.

originally posted by: agenda51

originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
a reply to: just4fun


Not about russian nukes you didn't.

Cause you think putin has the ability to use more than a handful of them before russian glass appears out of nowhere.

Dont forget the submarines. Pretty sure those would be at ready to launch status right now. I could be wrong though

We don't discuss American Submarines.

Tucker trying his best to preach de-escalation right now.

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: just4fun
How the hell can you even say they are not trying to avoid civilian casualties?

Easy. By intentionally shooting civilians, that's how they're not trying to avoid civilian casualties.

Those crazy a$$ Ukrainian Civilians keep launching themselves at russian bullets.

Never seen anything like it.

originally posted by: PatriotGames4u

originally posted by: agenda51

originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
a reply to: just4fun


Not about russian nukes you didn't.

Cause you think putin has the ability to use more than a handful of them before russian glass appears out of nowhere.

Dont forget the submarines. Pretty sure those would be at ready to launch status right now. I could be wrong though

We don't discuss American Submarines.

Sorry about that..... went back and fixed it. I meant Russian subs.

originally posted by: agenda51

originally posted by: PatriotGames4u

originally posted by: agenda51

originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
a reply to: just4fun


Not about russian nukes you didn't.

Cause you think putin has the ability to use more than a handful of them before russian glass appears out of nowhere.

Dont forget the submarines. Pretty sure those would be at ready to launch status right now. I could be wrong though

We don't discuss American Submarines.

Sorry about that..... went back and fixed it. I meant Russian subs.

I knew what you meant.

Do you know what I meant?

originally posted by: agenda51
Tucker trying his best to preach de-escalation right now.

Do you have a problem with de-escalation?

Were you hoping for the opposite?