It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“For every “I am X” state in which the Self finds itself, there is always another “I am “I am X”” state that the Self is pushed into, if it tries to formalize the state “I am X”. And the reason is simple: in order to formalize the current “I am X” state, the Self must think about it, but by thinking about it, it becomes that new thought, so it takes the new form “I am “I am X””, which replaces the very state that the Self wanted to formalize.”
Source: FL URL above.
“if the data we wish to explain are irreducibly first-personal, then any third-personal scientific approach cannot adequately describe our explanandum, let alone provide an explanation. At best, it can give us an account of the third-personally observable phenomena that are correlated with first-person experience; but that’s not the same as explaining first-person experience itself.”
Source: FL URL above.
“The location of each subject’s conscious experiences and dreams is not the world as such, but a subject-specific first-personally centred world. The first-personally centred worlds of different subjects can be viewed as distinct first-personal realizers of a shared third-personal world. If the third-personal world admits more than one conscious subject, then there can be many first-personally centred worlds, which are all real and parallel to each other. For each subject, one such world is present.”
Source: FL URL above.
"There are many parallel first-personally centred worlds, all of which are real, but only one of them is present for each subject. There is only one dream per dreamer, regardless of the number of dreams. And to dream all those dreams you need to be all the dreamers one by one. Unless you find a way to dream of a dreamer, and dream what that dreamer dreams.”
Source: FL URL above.
“If we ever do carry on a conversation with intelligent extra-terrestrials, it will essentially be in one of the following three ways: 1) we can somehow learn their sign system(s), 2) they can somehow learn our sign system(s), or 3) we can co-construct some novel sign system(s) together. In SETI, the first option seems most likely, whereas in METI the second option seems most likely. The third option seems to require some rudimentary success in the first two options, since it is hard to see how two parties could co-construct a novel sign system without a minimal prior grasp of each other's meanings. In any event, the learning curve that all three possibilities must travel can be made less steep by correct anticipations: the more our messages resemble what exominds expect, the less they will have to work to understand us.”
Source: FL URL above.
The only other thing as note that Pompeii gave birth too was psychology whereas before it was just philosophy
now that really makes me wonder why the Roman empire didnt get much of a result from their conquests in Scotland or Ireland
St Michael's Church was destroyed by an earthquake on 11 September 1275. According to the British Geological Survey, the earthquake was felt in London, Canterbury and Wales, and was reported to have destroyed many houses and churches in England.
Source: Wikipedia Glaston . . . .
The Tor seems to have been called Ynys yr Afalon (meaning "The Isle of Avalon") by the Britons and is believed by some, including the 12th and 13th century writer Gerald of Wales, to be the Avalon of Arthurian legend. The Tor has been associated with the name Avalon, and identified with King Arthur, since the alleged discovery of his and Queen Guinevere's neatly labelled coffins in 1191, recounted by Gerald of Wales. Author Christopher L. Hodapp asserts in his book The Templar Code for Dummies that Glastonbury Tor is one of the possible locations of the Holy Grail, because it is close to the monastery that housed the Nanteos Cup.
With the 19th century resurgence of interest in Celtic mythology, the Tor became associated with Gwyn ap Nudd, the first Lord of the Otherworld (Annwn) and later King of the Fairies. The Tor came to be represented as an entrance to Annwn or to Avalon, the land of the fairies. The Tor is supposedly a gateway into "The Land of the Dead (Avalon)".
Source: Wikipedia Glaston . . . .
originally posted by: NewNobodySpecial268
DP-2147 is in the news again.
how exominds communicate with us
“For every “I am X” state in which the Self finds itself, there is always another “I am “I am X”” state that the Self is pushed into, if it tries to formalize the state “I am X”. And the reason is simple: in order to formalize the current “I am X” state, the Self must think about it, but by thinking about it, it becomes that new thought, so it takes the new form “I am “I am X””, which replaces the very state that the Self wanted to formalize.”
Source: FL URL above.
Sounds like looking into the void between two thoughts to me.
“if the data we wish to explain are irreducibly first-personal, then any third-personal scientific approach cannot adequately describe our explanandum, let alone provide an explanation. At best, it can give us an account of the third-personally observable phenomena that are correlated with first-person experience; but that’s not the same as explaining first-person experience itself.”
Source: FL URL above.
Seems they are saying "contact" needs to be done in the first person, and not in the detached science fashion.
“The location of each subject’s conscious experiences and dreams is not the world as such, but a subject-specific first-personally centred world. The first-personally centred worlds of different subjects can be viewed as distinct first-personal realizers of a shared third-personal world. If the third-personal world admits more than one conscious subject, then there can be many first-personally centred worlds, which are all real and parallel to each other. For each subject, one such world is present.”
Source: FL URL above.
"There are many parallel first-personally centred worlds, all of which are real, but only one of them is present for each subject. There is only one dream per dreamer, regardless of the number of dreams. And to dream all those dreams you need to be all the dreamers one by one. Unless you find a way to dream of a dreamer, and dream what that dreamer dreams.”
Source: FL URL above.
Dreams are enclosed spaces: a 6 dimendional shared interactive dreamscape is where one meets "exominds". For that you need a dreamer to consciously create it, and invite "it" to join you.
“If we ever do carry on a conversation with intelligent extra-terrestrials, it will essentially be in one of the following three ways: 1) we can somehow learn their sign system(s), 2) they can somehow learn our sign system(s), or 3) we can co-construct some novel sign system(s) together. In SETI, the first option seems most likely, whereas in METI the second option seems most likely. The third option seems to require some rudimentary success in the first two options, since it is hard to see how two parties could co-construct a novel sign system without a minimal prior grasp of each other's meanings. In any event, the learning curve that all three possibilities must travel can be made less steep by correct anticipations: the more our messages resemble what exominds expect, the less they will have to work to understand us.”
Source: FL URL above.
Stop thinking about it and look into the void. You will find them there if they want to be found.
Sounds like looking into the void between two thoughts to me.