posted on Dec, 27 2013 @ 11:12 PM
Nice job of reacting to the data by the coaches,I will provide more offensive suggestions sooner,there is a stutter there,you guys take to long.But
nice job of shutting down their first exit zone transition and then closing the door in the n-zone,and really good job of tracking and neutralising
that upspeed playaction ,although they did sneak em through in every period.
Nice job of using a consistant Tactical Shooting Program , I could see it out there, now you have a few tactics to work on,especially the directed
rebound/pass off the goalies leg save in close that goes to the backdoor man,work onit and get the timing down,watch team canadas game and you will
see Sutter using it optimally,the same way we ccould after just a practice or two.
Also it is remiss not to try to roof it on a tender who goes down and stays down covering the bottom in close.That should have been adjusted.But at
least it is in the book on this guy now.
Goalies that cheat and time their drop with the speed of the incoming playaction and not the specific puck carrier are easy to anticipate,pregame
scouting should have had the team better prepared to exploit this ,it is a terminal flaw for a goalie to have .
As I said last year teams were picking a "locality" to shoot on Dubby from and I advised curative action in our zone and in the n-zone to stop them
from doing this.
With the tender tonight he was telegraphing his cheating and his weakness is how much top net he leaves open when he cheats down low early trying to
control the shooters decision making.We should have been exploiting him top shelf cookie jar style because he was giving up that sharp angle to the
shooters by swimmimg on the ice in the butterfly position,shooters just need to bury it and trust there is room on tenders like this.
With Dubby they were stepping into the same "locality" and going straight on top shelf while he was making a goaltending transition of is own.Once
we have dealt with a problem once the data availability and exchange means we SHOULD be aware of it in all phases of operations,so why wasnt Chabot
telling these things to the bench tonight?After he has had to work through the exact dynamics in his own wheelhouse already?This prior experience and
point on the learnng curve SHOULD have been transitioned into an offensive driver in pre-game scouting of their goalie and pre-game planning of the
Tactical Shooting Program.
And really just because I wasnt posting reams of offensive reactions doesnt mean you guys shouldnt have been implementing more or at least a few or
your own.I gave you a general template to work with and left the offensive integration to you,however there are always optimal offensive tactics and I
can give those next time so you can implement them at the right times.
Nicely played and a well Earned 2 points,the Turkey-Bowl is always a hard one to win after Christmas dinners all around,it is a really easy game for
the entire roster to just mail in, and the Oilers didnt do that they fought and battled to the end outcompeteing the Flames in a war of systemic
attrition.
The Flames shouldnt have switched from the man to man pressure they choked us out with last game,that NHS influence leads to a Blues style game,the
Flames tried to play different style game with us tonight an NHS influence we play against a lot now but never seem to master,they tried to utilise
the upspeed man managed from the 1st exit transition and supported through the n-zone.
That NHS influenced Blues style template is what I will soon be giving the Flames,that where we want them,where they can have a better impact not
lesser one like tonight was.I want the Flames to optimise their roster so they push the Oilers harder than they are.