It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by relocator
Her so called boyfriend that made the suggestion to talk with Mr. Cain should have called Herman up back then and ripped him a new one. No instead no one from that time has spoken up to say she had mentioned this to them. Her dad and current boyfriend knew nothing until last Friday. I say Gold Digger.
Her boyfriend at the time on Monday issued a statement released by Allred confirming that she told him about the incident at the time.
Originally posted by relocator
reply to post by Indigo5
Okay it's not a lie if I never knew that he made a comment through her attorney. So what her boyfriend back then doesn't have the balls to admit this other than through her attorney. What a wimp. Like I said he should have defended her honor back then.
Like I said this women hasn't done anything to convenience me that she's as humble, sweet and innocent as she claims to be and nobody from her past has either other than through her attorney...lol
Originally posted by relocator
Okay it's not a lie if I never knew that he made a comment through her attorney.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
Gloria Allred is the same attorney that went after Anthony Weiner. Should be interesting to see how quickly the republican base turns on her.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
The American people know a MSM smear campaign when they see one.
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by sweetliberty
Faceless, nameless people who hide behind their attorneys should not throw allegations into the public if their not going to back it up! But you go ahead and call Cain a lier and such, laugh it up, it's not you in the spotlight.
Faceless, nameless people
And people with faces and names? Are they allowed to speak up?
edit on 7-11-2011 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by relocator
So if I feel that this women isn't showing me anything that would convenience me that she's really out for my best interest by presenting this information than so it will be.
...
That's how I feel and only her actions can change it.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
The good news is that the American people know a high tech lynching effort when they see one.
Keep the smear campaigns coming. We need more money.$$$
I have watched long enough and held my tongue long enough to give him the benefit of the doubt, but can no longer say this is a witch hunt, “a lynching” to use his word, or any other euphemism.
There are allegations out there that matter and they have stacked up. For we who led the charge against Bill Clinton on a number of related issues to continue to blame the media or other campaigns or say it simply doesn’t matter makes us the hypocrites as well.
Unlike anonymous allegations, Ms. Bialek appeared credible and I was very disturbed by her characterization of what happened. Whoever Republican primary voters choose as president should be a man or woman of good moral character. We said when Bill Clinton was president that character counts and we still believe that.
Originally posted by Serenity71
I lived through four years of harassment at my former employer. It was four of the darkest years of my life, but I was a single mother and the thought of losing my job was terrifying. I knew (and was right) that if I reported it, the 20 year veteran of the company would be protected and I would be the collateral damage. I quietly found another position in another city and left the company. I reported the abuse to my HR department before I left and presented my four years of documented, notarized evidence. The HR dept did their investigation and found no wrongdoing on the part of the veteraned employee. I knew this would be the outcome and is the reason I never reported it before my resignation. I could have pursued it in a court of law, I could have made a huge to-do and demanded compensation, but what would it have done? It would have put me and my children through more hell than we had already been through. I moved away from the abuse and on to a better place, emotionally and financially.
Having lived through my own harassment hell, my first hunch on this woman is that she had an encounter with Cain, most likely it was consensual, and she is now looking for her moment of fame and a financial windfall. Her mannerisms and almost boastful attitude is hard to watch, especially since harassment leaves scars and emotional pain. Either she is hiding that pain incredubly well, or she is looking for her fifteen minutes of fame.
Originally posted by relocator
Now Serenity is someone I feel for and can support how she handled her situation.
One of the women who received a cash settlement after accusing Herman Cain of sexual harassment has been identified as federal government civil servant Karen Kraushaar, now a spokesperson for the Inspector General at the Internal Revenue Service.
Originally posted by relocator
I don't think bringing up what happened 9 or 12 years ago without any proof is going to do anyone any good.
What I find strange is you accuse me of not reading or listening to sources when I DID.. I don't know why you made this assumption, but I don't appreciate it. Call me smug and rude, but please, stop assuming stuff about me. If you want to know something, ASK me. I nearly always answer the questions put to me here. I'm really done with your assumptions. I didn't see the definition of a report in there. I could have missed it, though. It looks like the goalpost is beginning to move, though. People who, just a couple days ago, said Cain was innocent because the women didn't have the guts to come forward... are now attacking her council... As if her lawyer has ANYTHING to do with it. You wanted a name and a face. Now you've got it.