It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rainbowbear
reply to post by network dude
ok, so you are speaking of the exoteric, or apparent, meaning of God. And you are correct.
But thats not the only meaning--you are free to believe that is what masonic doctrine for who god is, for yourself.
please understand, that some masons believe in the other, more esoteric meaning for god. And it is the god warned about by your interpretation of who you think god is.
If you dont know this for yourself, its not as though I can make you understand. Im in a position of knowing. All I can do is point out the inconsistencies of your religion.
Originally posted by rainbowbear
...both are opposite of orthodox christian doctrine...
Originally posted by rainbowbear
Im thinking some masons go for A.Pikes work, and some do not.
But to say that there is not Luciferic Ideology contained in Freemasonry is insane.
The profane are reading up on the Lodges, they are using the words of the written teachings of freemasonry, and they deserve credit for seeking knowledge with a skeptical mind
--Im confused as to how a man could ignore their own faith in G.A.O.T.U.(the Great Architect of the Universe)
Also, ALL Freemasonry is rooted in Hebaru Mysticism-
All Freemasonry is Socialist (or more acuratly--humanist-the idea that man is God) in nature.
All Freemasonry has 2 threads. Operative (exoteric) and Speculative (esoteric).
to blatheringly defend your opinion without stating this these claims are true--sounds like an obvious lie, to anyone coming to this board for "truth".
Originally posted by Getsmart
If only the Pope was a Freemason he could hence Canonize all Freemasons SAINTHOOD for their lovely service to humanity in their cult of Lucifer?
I'm not a leader and i'm not a follower either,i'm more a loner i suppose,because during my teenage years while most everyone else was getting high and pregnant,i was reading hundreds of non fiction books about everything and i was ridiculed for doing so and was called a walking talking encyclopedia...
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by batgirl
Yea, I guess you are right. I really don't know why anyone would be opposed to being told they worship the devil.
Hey, I have a great idea! How about you go out in public, and just go up to random people and tell them they are luciferians and see how many times you can do that without getting beat near to death. You could take your little buddy Get smart with you. Good luck!
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by batgirl
Yea, I guess you are right. I really don't know why anyone would be opposed to being told they worship the devil.
Hey, I have a great idea! How about you go out in public, and just go up to random people and tell them they are luciferians and see how many times you can do that without getting beat near to death. You could take your little buddy Get smart with you. Good luck!
Originally posted by blocula
Are their costumes that you imaged above emulating some bizarre conglomeration of monks,preists, bishops and kings clothing from the middle ages? Or some forgotten cult from the past? Because originality would'nt be the correct term to use while trying to describe them...
Originally posted by Getsmart
If I am allowed to reply to your question, the image removed by Moderator DontTreadOnMe was one which revealed the garb of one among several sects of Luciferians...
Luciferian Garb of the Controllers of the Science Reality Matrix?
I find it very disturbing that those who preside over SCIENCE happen to be so many SUPERSTITIOUS SECT FOLLOWERS venerating an ALIEN ENTITY they call LUCIFER and Conjuring Demons in their RITUALS. It is in fact very alarming that such people have the unmitigated audacity to Rule over Scientific Fields and Preside what is widely promoted as Orthodox Science, which is often purposely deceptive and falsified. They tap and promote the finest minds only to corrupt them and enlist their complicity, using secrecy and career bait, honors and fabricated fame to LIE TO THE PUBLIC and PROMOTE ANTISCIENCE.
Just like there was the mounting suspicion that at this time in history we would be visited by the ANTICHRIST I think that it is safe to say that an ANTISCIENCE has been promoted as a False Religion to convince the deluded masses to BELIEVE IN Their Fairy Tales. Sure, Anti-Gravity cannot exist - the AntiScientists have proven this. Of course Creation cannot have happened the Darwinian AntiScientists have proven that. Obviously Free Energy is a preposterous concept, it has been demonstrated by the AntiScientists.
It may have represented wisdom, but snakes are also linked to notions of Satan and original sin.
he young Charles Darwin had listened to his grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, since childhood.46 Actually, it was Erasmus Darwin who first proposed the idea of evolution in England. He was known as a physicist, a psychologist and a poet and exercised considerable influence, although he led a dark personal life and had at least two illegitimate children.47 But Erasmus Darwin was one of the most well-known naturalists in England. Naturalism believed that the essence of the universe lay in nature and that it had a creative power. While the roots of this doctrine go back to the naturalist philosophy found in ancient Greek and Sumerian myths, its major proponent by the 19th century was the Masonic organization.
This fact was confirmed in 1884 by Pope Leo XIII, the leader of the Catholic world, in his encyclical Humanum Genus (The Human Race), which was directed particularly at the Masons: At this period, however, the partisans of evil seems to be combining together, and to be struggling with united vehemence, led on or assisted by that strongly organized and widespread association called the Freemasons. No longer making any secret of their purposes, they are now boldly rising up against God Himself.
Erasmus Darwin
The Pope continued to describe the relation between this organization and naturalism:
For, from what we have above most clearly shown, that which is their ultimate purpose forces itself into view – namely, the utter overthrow of that whole religious and political order of the world which the Christian teaching has produced, and the substitution of a new state of things in accordance with their ideas, of which the foundations and laws shall be drawn from mere naturalism. The Masons who adopted naturalism had their greatest representative in Erasmus Darwin, who was one of the masters of the Canongate Kilwinning Masonic lodge in Edinburgh, Scotland.49 Additionally, he seems to have been involved to some degree with the Jacobin clubs in France, or with the Illuminati, which was connected with certain Masonic lodges in France and whose primary duty was to oppose religion.50 Erasmus educated his son Robert Darwin (the father of Charles) to be like himself and made him a member of Masonic lodges.
Robert Darwin
51 Therefore, Charles Darwin inherited Masonry from his father and grandfather.
The main lines of Darwin's theory were, in reality, determined by his grandfather, whose naturalist works were designed as a guide for him. Erasmus Darwin developed the basic logic that was to give form to Darwinism and expounded it in books titled The Temple of Nature and Zoonomia. It was a renewal of the ancient pagan belief that nature has creative power. In 1784 a society was founded to assist in the dissemination of these ideas – The Philosophical Society – which, decades later, would become one of the largest and most passionate supporters of Charles Darwin's ideas.52 Darwin's own theory of evolution, however, was first proposed in the Galapagos Islands.
As he got older, especially in his famous, The Descent of Man, Darwin fell in line with much of the racist thinking of his day and even developed an early version the perspective later called “social Darwinism”:
At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes . . . will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.
excelle.monster.com...
“I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science. It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaws and holes as sound parts.”
"The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an improved theory, is it then a science or faith?"
“False facts are highly injurious to the progress of science, for they often endure long; but false views, if supported by some evidence, do little harm, for every one takes a salutary pleasure in proving their falseness.”