The Norway massacre and the question nobody cares to ask

Originally posted by skekke
reply to post by AllIsOne

 

It did'nt take 2 hours... The police has said today that it took about an hour to get the Delta Force up there, and get a propper boat and whatever.. So about an hour then.. Thats way to slow reaction time if you ask me.. But u know, little Norway aint used to these kinds of kiling rampages.. So I guess this is a sad wake up call for us...

Not to mention the fact that most of the police were deployed in Oslo by then

Originally posted by spyder550

Originally posted by Master_007
For me the question that needs to be asked is what drove him to it.

My theory is he was tired of immigrants taking over his country and not being given a chance to voice his legitmate concerns in a free and open manner because the zionist corporations want cheep labour in the country so that everyone ends up work for a slaves pay.

This is the results when people are forced underground and are kept out of the political system.

Things a little slow over at the Stormfront website?

That was a little uncalled for, don't you think? Just because a person dislikes Muslims doesn't mean he/she is a racist. I for one am not racist, but I strongly oppose all Abrahamic religions, whether it be Christianity, Islam, or Judaism. Does that make me a racist or an anti-Semite? Nope, not in the least, because I dislike the religion, not the race of the people who follow it. I'm actually very strongly opposed to racism as well. I treat all races equally and have absolutely no problem being friends or acquaintances with Arabs or Jews, as long as they aren't religious.

My question is, and always has been, why are Muslims allowed to immigrate to Euope, when quite a few of them openly state that their goal is to take over western civilization? Why haven't the gates been closed to them yet? Have you seen how these people act once they are graciously given permission to live in western civilization?

reply to post by Stormdancer777


No, I believe he called out that he surrendered, threw away his weapons, and knelt with his arms above his head.

Details are yet to leak...

=

Originally posted by nakiel
reply to post by Stormdancer777

 

No, I believe he called out that he surrendered, threw away his weapons, and knelt with his arms above his head.

Details are yet to leak...

WOW I think here they may have shot him anyway.

What itches me is that the police wont say anything about how many persons are missing in the PM quarter...

BTW: he used hollow points...

reply to post by Stormdancer777


At that time they didn't know how many were killed, and perhaps they wouldn't shoot a guy in police-uniform...

reply to post by skekke


I've just heard that it took them 90 minutes to get there. That response time is laughable under normal conditions, given the thread level AFTER the bombing, that kind of delay is inexcusable for a police force.

Police admit response to shooting was problematic

Meanwhile it's emerged police arrived at an island massacre about an hour and a half after the gunman first opened fire, slowed because they didn't have quick access to a helicopter and then couldn't find a boat to make their way to the scene just several hundred meters offshore.

The assailant surrendered when police finally reached him.

Survivors of the shooting spree have described hiding and fleeing into the water to escape the gunman, but a police briefing has detailed for the first time how long the terror lasted -- and how long victims waited for help.

Source: www.nzherald.co.nz...

reply to post by AllIsOne


They messed it up!
The closest police-station is located only 20 kilometers north...
Google-Map

My question is; Was Brevik a jock sniffin wannabe, or the real "spec-ops" assasin deal? From what I've read, Brevik was definately politically motivated, geared up, and amped to rock and roll. Not only did he make a deplorable statement with these heinous acts, I think he was also targeting a political bloodline of potential european leaders.

reply to post by AllIsOne


I question the response itself. If they got many calls, as reports suggest they did that there were killers on the Island, why not send up some sniper marksmen to stop them from the air? Where are drones when you need them? Why take an approach tactic that seems to me should be a step 2 in stopping the guy?

reply to post by fooks


from what ive read on norways laws they dont have a death peanalty and dont have sentences lasting longer then 21 years(21 years is the max u get)

Starting to sound more and more like a psi ops plan to me. We've had to put up with muslim terrorists for a while now and now that Al-Qaeda is wearing thin, it's time for a new boogeyman and if the book is anything to go by, we can now look forward to a wave of white supremacist nut cases going on the rampage, detonating bombs and killing innocent people throughout Europe..

reply to post by johncarter



Yes, mothers and fathers are feeling horrible emotion atm. And I do believe there is more going on than we know and you can bet that we will not find out until the last possible second. As for the actions of a monster, they are as clear as day, in my opinion there is no transparency.

It's the people who influenced the monster that I can't understand.

reply to post by coyote66

1 day before the incident, a local news tv here in indonesia was reporting about the group of girl scout to atend a intl. camp in norway. FYI all the girls came from a single and only province in indonesia, that got special autonomy to implement islamic law. the province of aceh, also nicknamed 'the front door of mecca' to indonesia

I find this interesting, if for nothing else than the timing. Has there been further comment about this, and if so, would you mind posting a link? Thanks.

reply to post by johncarter


You are right to be suspicious.

1) If he hates Muslims so much, why didn't he attack a mosque?

WHY DIDN'T HE KILL ANY IMMIGRANTS? NOT A SINGLE MUSLIM OR IMMIGRANT WAS HARMED, and yet Muslims reacted like lightning to play the victim, whining and pretending to be "scared" of attacks, and demanding extra police protection for all Muslims and mosques?

If he hates Muslims so much, why did he kill 90 young white Norwegians instead of Muslims?


2) The whole thing was a horrific False Flag event, designed to transfer public fear and blame from the Unholy Muslim/Marxist Allliance to Christians and Patriots like the English Defence League, anyone opposing the New World Order Globalist Mafia, just like his so-called "manifesto". His ludicrous statements about "advice" to the EDL clearly show he is trying to dredge up sympathy for Muslims, who are the ones who ALWAYS cause the violence at every demonstration, NEVER the EDL.

"White Al Queda Narrative Emerging in Norway Terror Attack"
www.infowars.com...

"Evidence Shows Norway Terror Attack a False Flag"
www.prisonplanet.com...


3) Why did it take the police an incredible 90 MINUTES to arrive, when news helicopters were filming overhead long before that? He was given a full 90 minutes to hunt down all those kids and shoot them one by one, some as much as SIX TIMES, as if to spill as much blood as possible. The island and the water were soaked with blood: a kind of ritual sacrifice, some say, to Molech by the attendees at Bohemian Grove, whose ceremonies generate a "vortex of dark energy". Some say.


4) Why was he COMPLETELY UNHARMED by the security forces capturing him? It was as if he KNEW he would not be harmed, as if it was all pre-arranged that he would not be harmed.

Originally posted by be4peace
stevebeckow.com bombing exercise

Oslo Police Held Bombing Exercise Days Before Blast: Similar to 9/11 and 7/7
2011 July 23
by Steve Beckow

Only a day after the blast, people are beginning to point out the resemblances to 9/11 and 7/7. Thanks to Edvard.
Oslo Police Conducted Bombing Exercise Days Before Terrorist Blast

UFO Blogger, July 23, 2011

www.ufo-blogger.com...

In yet another example of how almost every major terror event is accompanied by a security drill focused around the same scenario, Oslo police were conducting a bombing exercise at a location near the Oslo Opera House just 48 hours before a terrorist blast hit a government building in the Norwegian capital.

Although it’s too early to judge the nature of this exercise, the fallback of a drill, which gives the state an excuse should any evidence of complicity in the real attack emerge, has been evident in previous major terror events, including both 7/7 and 9/11.

NO THEY DID NOT!!!! the anti-bomb exercise took place on March 17'th 2010!!!. Somebody manipulated the dates, but here is the original article. you can do the translation yourself, I am just sick and tired of all the manipulation of actual facts to point you to a translated article.

www.aftenposten.no...

I have a couple of questions...

Why doesn't Norway have any helo's for their tactical forces?

And could this guy be some kind of Jason Bourne type, some manchurian assassin that just went off and now its coverup time?

Anyways, the response time is completely insane...87 kids dead...My heart and prayers go out to those who lost loved ones there. This is the true face of terrorism, you can't fight crazy.

Originally posted by KilrathiLG
reply to post by fooks

 

from what ive read on norways laws they dont have a death peanalty and dont have sentences lasting longer then 21 years(21 years is the max u get)

nope, that is not true either. The normal maximum jail sentence is 21 years, but there are circumstances in which you can be kept inprisoned forever, it is called "forvaring", which is a sort of preventative-jail sentence:

translate.google.com...

I'd like to ask for a few opinions on something that caught my eye. I'm not exactly calling foul, more pointing a finger and raising an eyebrow.

On the facebook page pdf that's being distributed, in the photos, there's a photo of him with a young lady and an older lady, on holiday. There's often a jpeg artifact "halo" around high contrasting figures in an often saved jpeg. JPEG is a lossey format, each time you save it, the entire image is compressed, so saving and saving and saving the same image creates artifacts in the image. It's a very handy way of covering up the signs of a doctored image, quite like aging paper to make it appear to be older.

If you look at the lady in the centre of the picture, though, I think I see something different. I work with photoshop a lot, and have done a lot of photo touch up work, and it looks to me like the foliage right behind her head has been cloned, like the girl in the photo's head was added to replace another head.

It could just be bad jpeg artifacting, and I've not seen anybody else mention it, so as I said at the start of the post, I'm not drawing conclusion, just asking for other people's thoughts.

I'd post a picture, but I'm not sure how to go about it. There's a link to the pdf on here