It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mysterious Missile Launch Over California - 11/8/2010

page: 131
354
<< 128  129  130    132  133  134 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 08:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
 


Right now we don't know who it was. The Government knows, we went through the cold war
with incidents like these and made it through. That said, I think we just have to wait and see as
there is no use pointing fingers at anyone until we have proof. It could have been a test of new
technology for all we know. Speculating on wether it is a plane or a missle is one thing, pointing
fingers is another. Freedom always has envious people trying to take it away ,let cooler heads
prevail.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 08:58 PM
link   
reply to post by SarK0Y
 

Sorry SarKOY...must be a translation problem.

Will look to correct.

Must be early there, nyet?



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:01 PM
link   
Glad to see at least someone is making fun of this event, looks like the first....
JACK FM ANNOUNCEMENT



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:02 PM
link   
reply to post by DivineAwakening
 


That guy is SO full of it. First, what does "around exactly the same time" even mean? Either it's exactly the same time, or it's around the same time. Second, missiles can and do change course. Thirs, he rtalks about it as though we would know, beyond any doubt, the intended course, when we don't even know who was responsible, and uses that supposed course as evidence that it was a plane? I had to stop watching, so there could be more wrong there.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:04 PM
link   
You know, I've looked at all the "missile-like" contrails and I'm still not convinced. I've seen plane contrails like that many times as have lots of people I know or have known. They are quite beautiful, actually. However, not one single time have I or anyone else I know that has seen it has ever thought for a second that it was a missile. Those missile-like contrails look like plane contrails to me and always have, but the one involved in this LA incident does not look like any plane contrail I've ever seen or any of the ones posted as evidence of a plane. Those contrails look like clouds to me, but this one looks like smoke. I can see the constant red glare at the back of the missile and it doesn't look like any plane lights I've ever seen. It a dark orangish-red color that looks exactly like fire from a rocket does.

The ultimate kicker for me is that if this was a plane, what reason would there be for everyone to say "We don't know what it was" even for ONE SECOND. There is absolutely no reason why this would be making international headlines over 24 hours later if this was simply a plane. This would have been cleared up hours afterwards with 100% certainty that it was a plane. It doesn't take almost two days to figure that out. How stupid do they look now? "Yeah uhh, it was a plane this whole time, sorry." Nonsense.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
 



They have shown up before. and they do have the capabilities

same behavior from China just will produce nuke strikes, their economy will be ruined for decades. however, China has been forced to serious activity in the World market by Natural Cataclysms on their territory.


Still no official conclusive government reports on what this was yet?

in Russia, mainstream only has doubled versions from USA.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by nittin
reply to post by loveguy
 



What is the point you are trying to make here? That is not my original post either.
edit on 10-11-2010 by nittin because: (no reason given)


The point I'm trying to make is that the truth of the matter is buried by the MSM and the Pentagon.
The report of exercises being conducted involving rocket/missile launches during the time and in the location, are being neglected of mention by the Pentagon/MSM.

To me, this is incompetence on behalf of those responsible to protect our borders/security, and those responsible for reporting to the people. You get a guy like me (the sky is falling) and you say there ain't nothing that can penetrate the security of the US...Rewind nine years ago, when we were safe and secure; I mean, when we were under the impression.

I ain't scared, I'm pi**ed.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:12 PM
link   
here is the problem with this thread, that will go on, and on , and on its a plane, its a rocket, no you are, no its a plane, no its a rocket by looking at the blurry mysterious footage, we have a air plane conclusion and a rocket conclusion, we have people digging up FAA records to try to explain a commercial air liner is up their at that time, with news reporters winding it up, we have military experts saying its a rocket missile we have the pentagon saying its a optical illusion.

After reading countless words, I mean countless words with everyone's opinions from their dogs to their own thoughts this is ridiculous. As far as my study is concerned I can come up to a consensus here, no matter how black and white anything like this will ever appear we will never all agree on it. You can see it on countless threads and countless history lessons, its almost as if its an anomaly of life. Here is another flaw I see happening over and over again especially on ats, instead of everyone coming to an agreement to what they are seeing, in order to try to find conclusions it turns into pages and pages and pages of pro vs con arguments to the degree and not lacking and up to Microsoft office documents being produced to reinforce opinions. For me I can use some of this friction to help purpell my thinking capability at times but as far as a balance to even try to find the truth in many of these threads it is lacking. I am not ranting I am observing, after 100 plus pages we have not gotten past the 1st page on this story, we don't really know anything about the reporter who reported this story, we have no idea where he was specifically when he filmed it, we have no further bearing to the location of the object, we have no other research by members to see if we have more footage from other witnesses, we have a story about a cruiseship which is off topic getting hit by a chinese emp missile, we have a flight path that is being spammed on the thread that makes little sense and has holes in the story, we have NO further information on this story, we have what the msm is showing and people telling one another what it is. Its a plane, no its a missile. C'mon, lets get smart, lets try to answer some questions here. For example why do we have military experts thinking this is a missile and we have the pentagon saying its a plane, now that is odd, a dept full of military experts are calling it a plane. Without an explanation proving it, just a statement. Or why would anyone be shooting missiles so close to the coast at sunset. Why for the love of God, can we not get past point a of this story? Am I really that smart to get past this part of identifying the problem, and working on trying to figure out how to solve it? Its just a shame.
edit on 10-11-2010 by Bicent76 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:17 PM
link   
reply to post by SWCCFAN
 



It's a bird! It's a Plane! No wait it's a Missile! oh nevermind it was all our imaginations.

Brilliant Version
now, i support only it! Our Imaginations
Matrix got the glitch! we need to call Neo to fix it kinda up



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Bicent76
 


I think most people believe what they want to believe for their own reasons. This is
a conspiracy site, not the pentagon, norad or the white house. imagine if everyone on
ATS had to make government policy

edit on 10-11-2010 by Mr. D because: syntax



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:22 PM
link   
Has anybody checked any foreign news sources to see what their saying...? I guess I could look into doing that now....



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:28 PM
link   
What we have here is a Test Flight of a Trident Class Missile with new extended range and targeting capabilities in response to the recent Test Flight of a Chinese Missile fired over Japanese waters which also had several upgrades to improve range and accuracy. Too big to be a Tomahawk too slow to be a Minuteman III www.youtube.com...
I dare speculate that President Obama had the splash zone somewhere near the feet of India's Prime Minister Singh to verify the accuracy of the product prior to purchase and acquisition of same. DIRT



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by johnny2127
 

I think he is in error.


He's in error?
Well we can check his qualifications because we know who he is.
What's your qualifications to make your opinion more believable?



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:30 PM
link   
ok for the third time i will say this...... we can all agree it was not a plane and this is why...think logically for once, if it was a plane then at the time of the incident when people where calling 911 and news stations to report a missle the government would have checked with norad and FAA and imeddiatley had evidence to prove it was a plane then the story would be over, but it has taken several days for them to say they dont know, or it might be a plane... come on people dont believe the illogical saying its a plane due to certain atmospheric swamp gas crap. read my previous posts for possibilities on why this missle was launched and by whom...also we have the technology to take down missles with lasers completely disentegrating them leaving no evidence (for those who say if it was a missle where did it land or where was it going) at least our gov. was quick enough to take it out



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mr. D
reply to post by Bicent76
 


I think most people believe what they want to believe for their own reasons. This is
a conspiracy site, not the pentagon, norad or the white house. imagine if everyone on
ATS had to make government policy

edit on 10-11-2010 by Mr. D because: syntax



true I keep forgetting I am on a conspiracy site. I just thought the studiers of conspiracy's would have higher IQ's.
nothing personal guys.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:33 PM
link   
reply to post by strokker
 


i think thats we might have seen, good post.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by drphilxr

Originally posted by Stewie
reply to post by SarK0Y
 

Хаппы то хеар фром а Руссиан.

И до нот белиеве ит ис ис тхе Цхинесе, бут щхо кнощс ин тхис цразы щорлд?



so you think its russian?

больш



Well since Sea Launch was recently bought out of bankruptcy by the Russians, that means the Russians now own a mobile sea launch platform that has it's home port in Long Island, just south of LA

So it must have been them that did it...


You guys are killing me... the news media, the generals, the pentagon, ATS... seems everyone is smoinn whacky weed.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by orangepeel
Has anybody checked any foreign news sources to see what their saying...? I guess I could look into doing that now....


Yeah BBC says it was a plane


www.bbc.co.uk...



I have always trusted BBC News



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:36 PM
link   
reply to post by beastamerica
 


Good pics, all. Similar angle, but some differences as well. Two comtrails close together in your pics, and no spiraling as we see in the video and pics of the mystery object.



posted on Nov, 10 2010 @ 09:38 PM
link   
CONFIRMED: US NAVY WAS TESTING MISSILE LAUNCHES OFF THE COAST OF CALIFORNIA

From page 55.
"434/10(18).
EASTERN NORTH PACIFIC.
CALIFORNIA.
MISSILES.
1. INTERMITTENT MISSILE FIRING OPERATIONS 0001Z TO 2359Z
DAILY MONDAY THRU SUNDAY IN THE NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER
SEA RANGE. THE MAJORITY OF MISSILE FIRINGS TAKE PLACE
1400Z TO 2359Z AND 0001Z TO 0200Z DAILY MONDAY THRU FRIDAY
IN AREA BOUND BY
...
3. VESSELS INBOUND AND OUTBOUND FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PORTS
WILL CREATE THE LEAST INTERFERENCE TO FIRING OPERATIONS
DURING THE SPECIFIC PERIODS, AS WELL AS ENHANCE THE VESSEL'S SAFETY WHEN PASSING THROUGH THE VICINITY OF THE SEA RANGE
IF THEY WILL TRANSIT VIA THE SANTA BARBARA CHANNEL AND WITHIN
NINE MILES OFFSHORE VICINITY OF POINT MUGU OR CROSS THE AREA
SOUTHWEST OF SAN NICOLAS ISLAND BETWEEN SUNSET AND SUNRISE.

www.nga.mil...



new topics

top topics



 
354
<< 128  129  130    132  133  134 >>

log in

join