Mysterious Missile Launch Over California - 11/8/2010

We don't know what it is. Lets be honest. We can speculate, but that is about it, at this time.
Here is what we do know: the government knows and isn't saying, or they don't know exactly and aren't saying. I don't know which is more alarming, to tell the truth.
Just because it looks like a rocket, doesn't mean that is the right answer. Just because someone said it is a plane, doesn't make that the right answer either. We just don't know right now.

Now, my speculation: It's a rocket, probably a military test of some sort, that for some reason they don't want to talk about. Perhaps it was a spy satellite.

well I don't intend to get into any Sorcha Faal
story. It was just my intention to prove this
was a missile and NOT a plane.
And I think I have did that already.

unexplained heat signature from the missile video

FAA Flight data for US808 does not match location
where video was taken.

Missile takes a left turn when flight data for US808
shows a RIGHT turn.

I'm sorry, but the plane theory does NOT
have wings. It's a missile folks.

reply to post by Smack


Secret or not they still have to notify the FAA and Norad.

Second line .... WHO DAT!

Swamp Gas with the sun behind it.

Trust me.

reply to post by boondock-saint


Yeah its a missle, like another member said, the smoke density does not compare to any other know comtrail images they have posted, Should me missle IMO, cant wait for more news or witness testimonials from the cruise liner people, Does anybody know anyone who was on that ship?

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by drphilxr

 

What was the Pacific Standard Time when the video was shot?

Edit: Note the timeof sunset on Maonday, 8 Novermber was 1654 PST.

www.sunrisesunset.com...,%20California;118.2;34;-8;1&month=11&year=2010&time_type=0

Ooops...go to www.sunrisesunset.com... find Los Angeles, and click on calendar....

edit on 10 November 2010 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)

Seriously then, why does the video have the label of 5:50 pm on it, from KCBS?

Despite the official sunset, can not light persist later? I find it odd still that it should have been

quite dark and wasn't. therefore, we have to assume the video time was MISLABELED???

reply to post by SWCCFAN

It's interesting to note that as US808 got closer to shore, it's groundspeed increased (while it maintained altitude). While that could indicate that the plane's airspeed increased that would seem unlikely. On the other hand, a change in the wind speed and direction at that altitude could also cause a change in groundspeed.

Upper air winds can and do vary just as surface winds do.
www.flickr.com...
www.flickr.com...
www.flickr.com...

Originally posted by Stewie
Rather than discuss who launched the missile, we discuss whether it was a missile....

If the Navy did it, why? Why keep it a secret? Unless this missile was gong to be tracked by the Chinese, or other countries (and our Navy knew it), and there was something spectacular about its range, why launch it that close to our own shores?

Can any expert here, and there seems to be a few.....

tell us where the missile went?
NO, of course you can't. You are "local" bullies that pretend you know more than you do. You rely on SOURCES you trust. but these sources can't give you any real specifics. Oh, except it was flight 808 or some other nonsense.

Was it China? Maybe. But that is what we should be talking about here. Who launched it?

We have a new "cold" war with fruitless but potentially 'live" launches with payload and a target. Has anyone here considered that? The consequences of that?

edit on 10-11-2010 by Stewie because: clarity

The Why question is often the hardest to answer even with facts presented. No one source alone should be focused on, but a variety of sources. Find connections, find the inconsistencies, determine how reputable the source is. Stuff like Infowars.com has proven to be a terrible source (though some of the articles are simply pulled from other websites that are more reputable.)

But the part that concerns me is not this event by itself. But a string of other events that have occurred over the years, often under radar or simply under reported. News media is about ratings and viewers and how long they can drag a story on...and once information stops coming in, they stop running the story and wont remind the citizenry of weird occurrences of the past...nor will they string the events together.

wsws.org...

The apparent missile launch on Monday is the latest in a series of high-profile but unexplained events involving the US military. In 2006, US nuclear missile parts were sent to Taiwan, supposedly by accident. In September 2007, it was learned that a nuclear-armed B-52 bomber flew over the US without authorization. And in 2008, a US military report was leaked in the European media noting that over 1,000 nuclear missile parts had gone missing.

Stuff like 1,000 nuclear missile parts disappearing is something that concerns me...but is swallowed by other stories. You have to pay attention, even if you follow underground news, and remember past stories that interest you or spark concern in you. Don't rely on them to make connections. This is why I print stuff out too and keep files (I know I am like a lil archivist!) in case the website goes down, or articles get deleted, etc.

Originally posted by mandoSD2012
reply to post by boondock-saint

 

This report claims a Satellite spotted an EMP event from a chiness SUB
www.whatdoesitmean.com...

I couldn't find anything on the Russian space agency site about any EMP event, maybe I didn't look hard enough? Why do people think posting a link from that site adds anything to credibility? Mebbe this is just what our reptilian overlords want us to think?

reply to post by zorgon


LoL you think that last pic you got is a plane ??

Sure looks like a long slender plane then...

Originally posted by boondock-saint
well I don't intend to get into any Sorcha Faal
story. It was just my intention to prove this
was a missile and NOT a plane.
And I think I have did that already.

unexplained heat signature from the missile video

FAA Flight data for US808 does not match location
where video was taken.

Missile takes a left turn when flight data for US808
shows a RIGHT turn.

I'm sorry, but the plane theory does NOT
have wings. It's a missile folks.

A lot of evidence goes AGAINST the plane theory as you have stated.

If it were a plane, wouldn't it be common for planes to come over that area, at that time, in that direction, and at that alt with no one going wowowowow what is that!?!? Especially with such international attention (despite not so much coverage)

reply to post by drphilxr

Are you sure that isn't the current time of the morning news program? (It does say "last night").
All the reports say the event happened at about 5:00PM on Monday.

reply to post by Tulkor

Thank you for that!

Second verse, same as the ferse.

or werse.

reply to post by Stewie

Was it China?

i'm very doubt of it: first & foremost, very doubtful moment of their capability to be so close at US shores; 2ndly, what is reason to launch missile? that would be no more than idiotic challenge to USA because they can Nothing to withstand nuke assaults from uncle sam

Cyberspy wrote

We don't sell ICBMs to anyone.

The UK must have stole them then? The US sold the UK Polaris and Trident.

en.wikipedia.org...

en.wikipedia.org...

TJ

Here's a video of a space shuttle launch from 35 miles away.

Any similarities?

www.youtube.com...

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by SWCCFAN

 

It's interesting to note that as US808 got closer to shore, it's groundspeed increased (while it maintained altitude). While that could indicate that the plane's airspeed increased that would seem unlikely. On the other hand, a change in the wind speed and direction at that altitude could also cause a change in groundspeed.

Upper air winds can and do vary just as surface winds do.

Yes they do, but they didn't here is the winds for 36,000' today yesterday was just about the same.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/d12af7f3bcf0.gif[/atsimg]

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter

Originally posted by woogleuk

"If the video indicated the normal route of a jet airplane, moreover, it should have been easy for the FAA to settle the matter. But both the FAA and NORAD had earlier claimed that there was no evidence of an airplane in the area."

well this proves there were NO airlines at the time of that contrail.

Get a grip. Just because somebody SAID the FAA said there weren't any planes in the area is no proof the FAA actually said it. What I heard them say was when they were asked about missiles they checked skin track radar and found no high-speed targets (i.e., missiles as opposed to airliners) in the area.

I think you are using a garble for original evidence, unless you can locate a citation directly attributing that claim to a named FAA/NORAD official. I'm betting you can't.

reply to post by Phage


i love your scrutiny - yes its possible the timestamp was the following day.

that will be my project for tomorrow if i can.

then we must default to the earlier time - 430pm was it? and as such, flight 808

was still in southern cali airspace. does anyone know the exact time of that video ?

isn't it strange we don't ...? LOL

ADDENDUM: My sister, who lives in Malibu, just informed me the actual lack of visible sunlight - not the

official sun-set - occured at 556 pm PST = 856 EST.

reply to post by SarK0Y

Хаппы то хеар фром а Руссиан.

И до нот белиеве ит ис ис тхе Цхинесе, бут щхо кнощс ин тхис цразы щорлд?