reply to post by moocowman
I'd like to weigh in.
I love South Park. I remember watching an interview with the creators who said their main goal was to portray children as they really were, not as
the angelic creatures that mythos has made them out to be. It struck within me much of what my anthropologist brother always describes.
Children between 2 and 6 are man at his most natural state. Religion, law, ethics have not yet been fully imprinted upon children. Really, truly
observe children and see what they are like left to their own devices.
They grab and the biggest kid wins. They push. They shove. They also are "colorblind". They tell the truth and they lie depending on their take
of the situation. They are cute as heck, but essentially they do what they need to do to have their own basic needs met. They love you, surely they
do, but they will also manipulate you and not see it as a violation of the love. They'll say: "I hate you!" to each other and mean it fully that
moment. They'll also swiftly make up and say "I love you".
They are man without guidance. Man is not inherently noble. Man is an animal that is hard-wired to survive as a bipedal predator.
Law, religion, ethics were all inventions of tribal society to "keep order". I am stating religion (not spirituality). When I hear people say: we
don't need religion to not be bad, or to not be good, I think that is oversimplifying a situation.
Studies have shown by universities as diverse as U of C and Harvard Med that humans are not monogamous and that 75% of men will cheat in their
lifetimes and half of women. Studies have shown that very close to 100% of humans will lie because it is a defense mechanism of the brain.
When there is a punishment/deterrant people...deter.
Punative religion, punative law was the first step in achieving order. People had to know whom all the children in a family belonged to or the family
unit would break down. Without paper contracts a man's word had to be his bond, so trustworthiness was essential.
The Hebrew Bible has 663 commandments according to the Chasidem. They are a mix of positive and negative commandments. In other words, the "thou
shalls" and the "thou shalt nots".
Where Jesus diverged was that the Gospels in their original language are "positive" commandments only. There is no talk of Hell in the original
texts of the Gospels--sorry folks. They were designed to evolve to the next step of human self-reliance. Make people think outside of themselves,
train them to avoid selfishness which is an inherent human trait (see Maslow).
So, while you can absolutely be a good person (as defined as having more good qualities than bad) without religion, it is still fair to say that you
were instructed by your parents to be a good person and those instructions came from a Judeo Christian root in this society. In Eastern Societies it
came from a Buddhist-Shinto root. What we consider "good" is in many cases anti-evolutionary for a bipedal predator 60,000 years ago.
So while we're out there bashing religion, or saying that people learned nothing from Christ, I interject to say that religion predated countries and
those "laws" helped form society in ways beyond our capacity to always acknowledge.