U.S. Intel: Iran Plans Nuclear Strike On U.S.

I don't think people are paying much attention to whatheory.

I've actually had the respect to try, but God he hop and jump from one topic to another, pick and choose what suits him to respond too.

If he doesn't agree, its insult.



Whatheory If you support these acts for war, then just stop wasting your time telling everyone on ATS and go out and fight it.

We don't our sons and daughters fighting for people like you and dieing just because you think its right.

[edit on 30-7-2008 by mind is the universe]

Originally posted by johnsky
You specified US.

Hey, I call it as it's typed. You don't want to say it that way, don't type it that way.

I already clarified that for you.
Since the poster is from the U.S. and this post is about Iran, I think it's obvious unless you think the people of Iran has this same right of innocent until proven guilty. Do you?
However, I do see your point and I could have worded that better.

Originally posted by mind is the universe
I don't think people are paying much attention to whatheory.

I don't think anybody cares what you think.

Look, for the past numerous posts you have done nothing but post about me instead of the topic at hand. Why don't you stick to the topic at hand instead of making posts about me. Worry about your own posts ok.

This is your typical M.O. and your same actions got another thread locked. So please stop it here so you don't get this thread locked.

Originally posted by ThichHeaded
Remember girls and boys... We heard this same bs going into Iraq...

And Iraq had what?? Survey says: NOT A DAMN THING!

Keep that in mind when your voting in the next idiot for president.

Yeah, keep it in mind b/c that idiot supported that war completely, and even supported draft reinstitution at one point. Yes, McCAIN, the pale rider who's name is DEATH .. CAIN = FIRST MURDERER (DEATH), Mc = McDonalds, DIE!

reply to post by WhatTheory


sure you have ,
all i see so far is you only responding to half or less then half of my replys from my previous replies. youu want me to cut you a break if you want to quote me, quote my whole repose and not just abit.

throughout this topic you seem to be the only one that has sidetracked or added extras then go onto tell others not to go offtopic by replying to your remarks.

so before you say i am despreate look at your replies first

reply to post by runetang


There is no way mccain will be in any position possible to go to war with iran. Obama is going to get it.

Unless of course our "intelligence" keeps bringing us little "truths" like this then this stupid ass country might think we NEED a war monger.

reply to post by mybigunit


I reckon the guy IS a troll. I put him on ignore a couple of weeks ago because I'm skeptical that he can actually believe a lot of the stuff he says...and I'd actually be surprised if he doesn't say what he says just to get a reaction.

Anyway, "Iran planning a nuclear strike on the US" just seems absurd to me.

F



[edit on 30/7/08 by Fuggle]

Oh boy, here we go. I thought this president was done after the embarrassing handling of the Iraq/Afghan war. It seems like he might really try to take us into iran

I've never been so ashamed of being an American as I am now.

Ok everyone calm down. The report that Iran did launch missiles off ships practicing this is true but it happened years ago. I dont think Iran is suicidal and for our navy to let something like slip by them is impossible with the spy systems they have.

Bush will be impeached hopefully and the world can get some sence of normal back.

reply to post by WhatTheory


You are very rude, in fact im sure you will have some jack ass remark for what I am sayin now.

Why do you waste your time in here if you cannot be civilized and stick to the point? Do you think it is funny to be a jerk? It really is not you make your self look idiotic and arrogant. If that was your goal here bang up job you have succeeded admirably.

Now you can either stick to the topic at hand and stop being rude, or leave.

Looking at most of your posts I saw nothing that had to do with Iran's fake nuclear threats. I think you can agree that this is a very serious topic, it should be it could mean a third world war and a first nuclear war if we are stupid enough to go into Iran. If we do go into Iran Russia will be our enemy as will most of the rest of the world, that is a very serious topic. If Iran doesnt have nukes guess which of their allies does have them, almost as much as we have.

reply to post by mrsdudara

Ok, this is quite frustrating.

Lets sum this up in black and white

Iran has nukes

Yes it is quite frustrating especially when people like yourself keep spreading MORE misconceptions.

So you've seen the Nukes for yourself have you? When did you last go to Iran?

If you have first hand knowledge you might want to head over to Langley and give them a briefing because this is exactly the kind of Intel they're looking for to justify another war

NO ONE has conclusively proven Iran has nuclear weapons or the means to create them.

It's all speculation and hot air.

Don't jump to that assumption.

Iran has far more pressing reasons to develop Nuclear Power other than attacking the US or Israel:

1. Iran is a signatory of the NPT and has a legal right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes under that treaty which the US is also part of.

2. Iran's population has more than doubled in 20 years.

3. The country CANNOT refine it's own oil supplies and has to rely on imported Oil products for energy supplies.

4. Iran burns that burning fossil fuels from it's oil in huge amounts for electrical generation which is not only incredibly inefficient but is polluting their environment.

5. Poverty is a major issue for the working class in Iran. Many cannot afford the rising energy costs.
America isn't the only one feeling the increasing cost of living.

6. Iran's Oil Fields are being depleted by 2 or 3% per year.

7. Nuclear Power has incredibly minuscule operating costs compared to other methods of electrical generation.

8. Iran has huge reserves of Uranium Ore which would make the costs of fuelling civilian Nuclear Plants quite low.

9. Israel, India, and Pakistan all have nuclear weapons.
Nations which are currently engaged in low intensity conflicts and have actually threatened to use Nuclear Weapons in the past.
Why the double standard with Iran?

Iran has not invaded another country for hundreds of years.

reply to post by The Godfather of Conspira


Iran might not have them but Russia does and Russia has said that if we invade or attack Iran they will back Iran.

Them not invading in over 100 years means nothing if their current leader wants to invade. If he wants to he most likely will.

reply to post by caballero

Iran might not have them but Russia does and Russia has said that if we invade or attack Iran they will back Iran.

Where has Russia said this firstly?

Secondly, you honestly conclude Russia would actually risk getting into a Nuclear War with the US to defend a country their not even allies with?


Is every foreign country just full of wild-eyed, crazed madmen who live for battle and warfare to you?

Yeah right Ahmadinejad's another one of those suicidal towel heads who just have a perpetual hard-on for war.

He's going to Nuke Israel or America and then watch as his entire country is turned into ash and vapor.

Yes, that is perfectly reasonable thinking...

[edit on 30/7/08 by The Godfather of Conspira]

reply to post by DimensionalDetective


i dont know about you but i think i smell some false flag terrorism brewing in the disinfo circles.

i sure am glad i dont live in a major city like chicago or LA. you guys might get to see what false flag terrorism really looks like up close.

i have a feeling it will be a really bright white flash followed by a second of intense heat, and then nothingness.

oh no america just got nuked by its own shadow government!
but oh well... yeeeeha were goin to iran, to kill some more a-rabs!

reply to post by TheRepublic


I agree 100%.

Whenever any "official" of any "organization" talks about a nuke strike in the US I start feeling nervous...after 911 I don't blame myself...and just so there is absolutely no confusion...it is NOT Iran that I fear.


PS Love that Avatar LOL!! and yet i will probably hold my nose and vote for him...aaaarrrrgggghh

I am a hawk of some regards on Iran and agree their killing of Ameircans needs to stop but I just don't see them being this stupid. Attacking Israel - yes, the U.S. - very doubtful.

Saddam Hussein's regime was supporting al Qaeda says members of his own regime...another thing the media lied about
regimeofterror.com...

Originally posted by WhatTheory

Originally posted by mind is the universe
So.............................

So.............why did they not want the nuclear power plants with the fuel if they really need them for power? Answer: They want nukes not nuclear power. Simple really.

So what? You seem like an intelligent guy, so how about an intelligent answer as to why it's wrong for Iran to have nuclear weapons?

Also what would be your reaction be should an invasion occur and no technology to create WMD's or WMD's to be found themselves, as with Iraq?

Also what do you think to the double standards, in the fact that the EU and the UN countries have nuclear weapons, but are trying to stop another nation from developing the technology?



[edit on 30-7-2008 by cleggy88]

www.whitehouse.gov...

July 30, 2008

Dear Madam Speaker: (Dear Mr. President

I am pleased to transmit to the Congress, consistent with the provisions of section 699M of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 110-161), the enclosed report entitled, "Comprehensive Nuclear Threat Reduction and Security Plan."

This report, compiled by the Departments of State, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security, details Federal plans to ensure that all weapons and weapons-usable material at vulnerable sites are secure from terrorist threats. As required, the report includes information on sustainability plans, interagency cooperation, programmatic and budgetary requirements, and international engagement related to these vital national security efforts.

Sincerely,

GEORGE W. BUSH

interesting i guess!

reply to post by Leo Strauss


i know exactly what you mean. im way more afraid of my own government being run by perverted suicidal nihlists than iran being run by a politically marginalized homophobe.

thanks about the avatar i got a good chuckle when i saw it on the internet. i honestly respect people who vote for him but realize he is just another typical politicianand that he is probably corrupt.

i just dislike the crazyones who think he is the second coming of the christ child. the kool aid drinkers who tell me how great its all gonna be, i call them obamas witnesses hahah.

reply to post by The Godfather of Conspira


Putin said he would help Iran here

here

here

here

and here Russia gives Iran some air defense missiles

They are supporting Iran and warning us not to attack, if we attack Putin wont come back to our side he will honor His and Irans alliance.