U.S. Intel: Iran Plans Nuclear Strike On U.S.

Well I rarely comment on NEWSMAX stories... to much crap is published by these guys.... I have came across very important information through Newsmax, and have been handed my hat in my hand more than once.
so triple research these stories before posting from this entity.

Now for a Nuke attack on America by IRAN, yes it could happen. if by missle then one maybe more will hit us, but Iran would be nothing but
glass a moment or two prior to their missle hitting anywhere in the USA.
we have Subs and the persian gulf has at least 2 on duty at any given time. just in case Isreali is attacked. mutual assured destruction doctrine.

Minot, ND - Barksdale, LA. still has a loose nuke hanging around the USA somewhere.
* Barksdale AFB, reports on unusal activity (unconfirmed sources)
* Minot, ND - nothing out the unusual has been reported.
*Camp Pendleton -- people missing -- weird manuvers -- foriegn troops...
---------------------- whats going on at camp pendelton. CA...??

Originally posted by cashlink
Our Country is run by a group of terrorists!
They are the biggist threat to the world peace.

No, people you think like yourself are the problem.

These terrorist want all the oil land in Iran, they are thives, murders, liers,
Oh we havent seen the greed yet they will stop at nothing.

Oh good grief!
If we wanted the oil, we would have it already. Hell, we had the chance to take all the oil during the first gulf war when Kuwait was invaded by Saddam. Your point is moot and ludicrous.

Originally posted by proximo
Lets just assume for a second that they have one and could actually reach the US. The immediate response will be the complete and total annihilation of Iran - they lose and will cease to exist.

Are you sure?
With all the panty waists comments I hear here on ATS and from some of the public in general who are against war at all costs, they might want to talk to Iran first to find out why they did such a deed. Hell, some of the loonies here in the U.S. might not want to retaliate because they think the U.S. probably deserved it.

Another point: If they were able to sneak a nuke into the U.S. and detonate it, it might be difficult to determine where the bomb originated because I'm sure Iran would do this through a proxy with one of their terror groups they support. So it might not be immediately obvious where the bomb originated.

[edit on 31-7-2008 by WhatTheory]

Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Saddam DID NOT have any Weapons of Mass Destruction:

Well, this is still open for debate.
Here is a new article regarding this topic.

U.S. official: Iraqis told me WMDs sent to Syria

The recent Israeli attack in Syria could have been related to this also.
Let's not forgot some of the previous sources:

DoD report

Syria storing WMD

Iraqi documents

Huh?

Whoa horsie! Relax dude. I was just pointing out the many stars & flags.
In a tongue in cheek kind of way.

I'm well aware of the propaganda and, believe me, I am certain that they have a surprise for any invaders. I DO NOT wish to see an invasion and I too laugh at the propaganda.

However I also believe that they have nukes already and have a right to have em. I think if it came out that they do have them they can prove that they are responsible owners. I also believe that Saudi Arabia is very well armed with nukes to the level that Israel is. Oil can buy you many friends. Heck every country should have em.
Let the devil sort em all out!

reply to post by The Godfather of Conspira

... and thus, the saga continues. The US will attack Iran as its economy keeps on declining and the EU positions itself as the new pinnacle of justice and prosperity while becoming more Orwellian every day.

Originally posted by WhatTheory


Look, for the past numerous posts you have done nothing but post about me instead of the topic at hand. Why don't you stick to the topic at hand instead of making posts about me.

I've been contributing to the thread. I've been replying to many people, I have respect, I listen to other's people point's/

This is your typical M.O. and your same actions got another thread locked. So please stop it here so you don't get this thread locked.

No Whatheory "I" issued a warning to the mods, "on" your behaviour. The mods didn't deal with your behaviour, so they temporarilly locked it

I stick to the thread on hand, I show what I stand for, what I believe in, I express what I see in the world.


I contribute as a human, who does not want war in this world and who cares about other humans. You however twist, lie, and insult people if people don't agree with you, you troll and provoke uneccessary behaviour in this world, such as war.
I don't pay much attention to your points anymore. They are absurd, and rude. Always the one agenda with you. It's you who get's into arguements because you cannot argue properly


I'm and other's are aware of your behaviour, where are the mods??? a mod should have dealted with you along time ago. You've insulted many people here already. Now since i've debunked your lies,


Let's get back on topic.
Whatheory, if you think Iran is wrong for everything that they do with their country why don't you go and fight them yourself.



[edit on 31-7-2008 by mind is the universe]

I'm going to say it.

Here is comes!

...If Iran develops long-range nuclear weapons that can reach the United States (and hey, it probably won't)...

...I'd support invading it. Unless we get this damn SDI thing going.

Originally posted by mind is the universe
I'm and other's are aware of your behaviour, where are the mods??? a mod should have dwealted with you along time ago.

That's because you are the problem.
And again, you make another post about me instead of the topic.

Whatheory, if you think Iran is wrong for everything that they do with their country why don't you go and fight them.

This is like the 2nd or 3rd time you have said this. Are you a parrot?
Go back and read my response because I am not going to repeat myself for a 2nd or 3rd time.

Originally posted by WhatTheory

That's because you are the problem.

And again, you make another post about me instead of the topic.

Another accusation, can you stick to the topic on hand?

[This is like the 2nd or 3rd time you have said this. Are you a parrot?
Go back and read my response because I am not going to repeat myself for a 2nd or 3rd time.

No I'm not a parrot. The insults I get?

[edit on 31-7-2008 by mind is the universe]

Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira

Saddam DID NOT have any Weapons of Mass Destruction:

Yes, he did. BUT they were legal. They had a label on them stating 'warning do not use' 'weapon of mass distruction' so it didnt count. We just didnt find any illegal ones. Minor discrepancy. UN came and took the barrels anyway so that there would not be any more misunderstandings.

And then perhaps tomorrow we shall awaken to more preemptive bull#.

pardon the one liner.

Originally posted by cleggy88

Originally posted by WhatTheory
So.............why did they not want the nuclear power plants with the fuel if they really need them for power? Answer: They want nukes not nuclear power. Simple really.

So what? You seem like an intelligent guy, so how about an intelligent answer as to why it's wrong for Iran to have nuclear weapons?

Also what would be your reaction be should an invasion occur and no technology to create WMD's or WMD's to be found themselves, as with Iraq?

Also what do you think to the double standards, in the fact that the EU and the UN countries have nuclear weapons, but are trying to stop another nation from developing the technology?

You say you don't dodge questions, so how about some answers?

I think it's a really sad thing we are having this discussion, many people on here have been saying for years that Iran would be next. Shame it actually seems it will come to it, what's even worse is that we can't do anything about it.

If people were to organise protests and the such, would we even be listened to?

If we did get enough people so our voices were heard, would we just see another false flag attack that would sway the majority back towards supporting the war?

I can only see bad things coming from any invasion or attack on Iran, the world is already changing for the worse, increasing oil prices which in turn drives up food prices when there is already a shortage, gas prices increased ~50% over here today, economies collapsing. The future doesn't look so bright. More war is the last thing the world needs right now.

edit - when I mention gas I mean natural gas used for heating and cooking, don't want to confuse you Americans into thinking I meant petrol/diesel

[edit on 31-7-2008 by cleggy88]

reply to post by mrsdudara


That seems overly retarded as I could say the same for the guns and drugs I'm stashing. "warning do not use, harmful."

Mind you, i love drugs but this just opens up an entirely new can of worms, because to my knowledge, he actually did NOT HAVE volatile nuclear technology that posed any risk to the world.

What you heard is more US propaganda trying somehow to twist it in order to cover their own asses.

In other news; Top Bush administration officials, flunkies in the Department of Homeland Security, members of the press, and former military brass turned into nonsense-spouting-prostitutes all got in a big circle and stroked each other.

edit to delete. sorry got off topic.


Are there any more news articles on this subject by chance? All I am seeing on it now is Iran and Russia saying it was all disinfo.

[edit on 31-7-2008 by mrsdudara]

Originally posted by cleggy88
You say you don't dodge questions, so how about some answers?

Umm...I did. I guess you have a selective reading problem or you are being disingenuous. I guess you could have overlooked it also.

Anyway, I will repeat myself just for you and use an analogy which you should be able to understand regarding the question why Iran should not be allowed to have nukes while other nations have them.
Answer: You don't give a gun to people with a known mental condition or who openly admit that they will use it for destruction.
Do you get it? Iran cannot be trusted to have such power. Simple.

Originally posted by WhatTheory

Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Saddam DID NOT have any Weapons of Mass Destruction:

Well, this is still open for debate.
Here is a new article regarding this topic.

U.S. official: Iraqis told me WMDs sent to Syria

The recent Israeli attack in Syria could have been related to this also.
Let's not forgot some of the previous sources:

DoD report

Syria storing WMD

Iraqi documents

So um... Why isn't the MSM jubilantly waving these WMDs in Syria around? Could it be someone was paid to say that WMD went there from Iraq?

I mean, if this was bullet-proof, the MSM would be having a field day!

I'm sorry, I don't buy this.

Originally posted by Amaterasu
So um... Why isn't the MSM jubilantly waving these WMDs in Syria around?

Isn't it obvious? The MSM hates the current administration and they do everything in their power to make it look bad. They only show the bad news on TV and practically never report any good news. The MSM would never report anything that even remotely suggests Bush might have been correct.

Originally posted by WhatTheory

Originally posted by Amaterasu
So um... Why isn't the MSM jubilantly waving these WMDs in Syria around?

Isn't it obvious? The MSM hates the current administration and they do everything in their power to make it look bad. They only show the bad news on TV and practically never report any good news. The MSM would never report anything that even remotely suggests Bush might have been correct.

Oh good grief! They spouted all the 9/11 creppola the admin wanted them to. Why wouldn't they now? With Murdock in control of so much.

Though off topic, I will add my opinion of your vitriol and bating. What is obvious is that you have an agenda to disinform.