This is why abortion, particularly late term abortion, is so important to the democrats

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: network dude

Here in the UK the answer to your question would appear to be when the baby is born.

As to the US, i dont know, again does that not vary from state to state now depending on the abortion laws?

You don’t have to fight religion.

States that are more religious are trying to make anti-abortion laws — without the will of the people.

Because when it goes to vote of the people —right to abortion wins.

Except, there is no RIGHT to infantcide.

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: network dude

Here in the UK the answer to your question would appear to be when the baby is born.

As to the US, i dont know, again does that not vary from state to state now depending on the abortion laws?

You don’t have to fight religion.

States that are more religious are trying to make anti-abortion laws — without the will of the people.

Because when it goes to vote of the people —right to abortion wins.

Except, there is no RIGHT to infantcide.

You wanna explain that?

Viability has always been the standard.

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: network dude

Here in the UK the answer to your question would appear to be when the baby is born.

As to the US, i dont know, again does that not vary from state to state now depending on the abortion laws?

You don’t have to fight religion.

States that are more religious are trying to make anti-abortion laws — without the will of the people.

Because when it goes to vote of the people —right to abortion wins.

Except, there is no RIGHT to infantcide.

Infanticide is the act of intentionally ending the life of a newborn baby.

www.humanium.org...

Nobody is advocating for infanticide.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: network dude

Here in the UK the answer to your question would appear to be when the baby is born.

As to the US, i dont know, again does that not vary from state to state now depending on the abortion laws?

You don’t have to fight religion.

States that are more religious are trying to make anti-abortion laws — without the will of the people.

Because when it goes to vote of the people —right to abortion wins.

Except, there is no RIGHT to infantcide.

You wanna explain that?

Viability has always been the standard.

You are the one claiming a right to abortion. There is no right.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: network dude

Here in the UK the answer to your question would appear to be when the baby is born.

As to the US, i dont know, again does that not vary from state to state now depending on the abortion laws?

You don’t have to fight religion.

States that are more religious are trying to make anti-abortion laws — without the will of the people.

Because when it goes to vote of the people —right to abortion wins.

Except, there is no RIGHT to infantcide.

Infanticide is the act of intentionally ending the life of a newborn baby.

www.humanium.org...

Nobody is advocating for infanticide.

So, as long as the baby hasn't squeezed out of the vagina yet, you're okay with abortion. Got it. Pathetic

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: Annee
What is your experience?

Irrelevant.

This story is about an illegal operation where babies were murdered and their body parts were sold. It has nothing to do with 'reproductive choices'. Therefore, it is the business of every citizen of the United States who believes in law and order.

Your experience in pregnancies — miscarriages — abortion compared to mine is not irrelevant.

You have an adopted child because you were unable to conceive.

Let’s make a law of only natural birth parents are legally allowed to raise a child.

And you have no personal say or choice in the matter.

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: network dude

Here in the UK the answer to your question would appear to be when the baby is born.

As to the US, i dont know, again does that not vary from state to state now depending on the abortion laws?

You don’t have to fight religion.

States that are more religious are trying to make anti-abortion laws — without the will of the people.

Because when it goes to vote of the people —right to abortion wins.

Except, there is no RIGHT to infantcide.

Infanticide is the act of intentionally ending the life of a newborn baby.

www.humanium.org...

Nobody is advocating for infanticide.

So, as long as the baby hasn't squeezed out of the vagina yet, you're okay with abortion. Got it. Pathetic

Viability is ability to live outside the womb.

I am against unwanted births.

I am a major supporter of ALL LIVING CHILDREN.

Let me know when ALL LIVING CHILDREN are fed — clothed — educated — housed — cared for — loved.

originally posted by: Annee

Your experience in pregnancies ...

Is IRRELEVANT to this thread.

The information in the Opening Post is that an organization was ILLEGALLY killing babies and selling their body parts. THAT is the topic. The killing of babies and selling their body parts ILLEGALLY. It's an illegal money making machine. And Kamala Harris persecuted the journalists who exposed it while not prosecuting the baby killers who were engaged in illegal activity.

You paying for a butcher to slaughter your child is irrelevant to that story.
My adopting a child is irrelevant to that story.
Try to get that through your head and address the information in the opening post.

originally posted by: fringeofthefringe

Newly Released Undercover Video Exposes Planned Parenthood Employees Joking and Laughing While , Allegedly Admitting to Selling Aborted Baby Organs and Dismembered Parts

Ulterior motives

This has been exposed a few years ago, maybe this new video will have an impact. Abortion is a states rights issue, maybe this will help voters decide what limits abortions should have. There is an attempt to make abortion an issue for this presidential election, it is just a way for Kamala to avoid the real issues the next president will need to grapple with. The economy, open borders and global stability are what this presidential election is about, not abortion.

Peddling flesh, literally.

May they experience hell here, before arriving in Hell after suffering a miserable death in this body.
😡

originally posted by: Annee
I am a major supporter of ALL LIVING CHILDREN.

No you are not.
The babies heart is beating before two weeks in the womb.
That baby is alive with a heart beat.
Yet you slaughter your own child in the womb and want everyone in the country to pay for other people to slaughter children in their wombs. Some sick twisted reasoning that if everyone murders their child then what you did must not be so bad.

a reply to: Annee

"When someone else solves an unsolvable problem, I'll stop supporting killing babies."

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: network dude

Here in the UK the answer to your question would appear to be when the baby is born.

As to the US, i dont know, again does that not vary from state to state now depending on the abortion laws?

You don’t have to fight religion.

States that are more religious are trying to make anti-abortion laws — without the will of the people.

Because when it goes to vote of the people —right to abortion wins.

Except, there is no RIGHT to infantcide.

Infanticide is the act of intentionally ending the life of a newborn baby.

www.humanium.org...

Nobody is advocating for infanticide.

Ralph Northam disagrees....

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Annee

"When someone else solves an unsolvable problem, I'll stop supporting killing babies."

Only your own.

And they are not babies.

a reply to: Annee

And that vote is coming up.

a reply to: FlyersFan

The information in the Opening Post is that an organization was ILLEGALLY killing babies and selling their body parts. THAT is the topic. The killing of babies and selling their body parts ILLEGALLY

Yes, it has been drifting into fallacy argument. [humor removed]

So to the OP video.

I take the story with a grain of salt because it's Gateway Pundit. While a broken clock can be right, I need multiple sources for their articles. And, as expected, it led to a 9 year old archive.

While you'll scoff at the sources, it has since been resolved.

www.factcheck.org...

www.npr.org...

Looks like the two that released the video were indicted.

A grand jury in Harris County, Texas, voted to indict in a state investigation of Planned Parenthood. But it didn't indict the reproductive rights organization. In an unexpected turn, the grand jury indicted two anti-abortion activists from the Center for Medical Progress. That is the organization that famously last year released videos that it said depicted Planned Parenthood illegally trying to sell fetal body parts.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Annee

"When someone else solves an unsolvable problem, I'll stop supporting killing babies."

Only your own.

And they are not babies.

Are they tomatoes? Rabbits?

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Annee

"When someone else solves an unsolvable problem, I'll stop supporting killing babies."

A potential anything is not the finished product.

Embryos — zygotes are not babies.

What I fished out of the toilet from my miscarriage was not a baby.

a reply to: Annee

Again, are they tomatoes. Rabbits? Horses?

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: network dude

Here in the UK the answer to your question would appear to be when the baby is born.

As to the US, i dont know, again does that not vary from state to state now depending on the abortion laws?

You don’t have to fight religion.

States that are more religious are trying to make anti-abortion laws — without the will of the people.

Because when it goes to vote of the people —right to abortion wins.

Except, there is no RIGHT to infantcide.

Infanticide is the act of intentionally ending the life of a newborn baby.

www.humanium.org...

Nobody is advocating for infanticide.

Ralph Northam disagrees....

No he doesn't. This misinformation has been debunked again and again.

Ralph Northam explained what happens, right now, every day in every state in the country when an infant is born with birth defects that are incompatible with life. Do doctors perform heroic medical intervention to keep the infant artificially alive for a week longer? Or do doctors make sure the infant is made comfortable until it succumbs to its disease? This is a decision to be made by the parents and their doctors, not for you or me to make, not for legislators to make.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Moon68

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: network dude

Here in the UK the answer to your question would appear to be when the baby is born.

As to the US, i dont know, again does that not vary from state to state now depending on the abortion laws?

You don’t have to fight religion.

States that are more religious are trying to make anti-abortion laws — without the will of the people.

Because when it goes to vote of the people —right to abortion wins.

Except, there is no RIGHT to infantcide.

Infanticide is the act of intentionally ending the life of a newborn baby.

www.humanium.org...

Nobody is advocating for infanticide.

So, as long as the baby hasn't squeezed out of the vagina yet, you're okay with abortion. Got it. Pathetic

Viability is ability to live outside the womb.

I am against unwanted births.

I am a major supporter of ALL LIVING CHILDREN.

Let me know when ALL LIVING CHILDREN are fed — clothed — educated — housed — cared for — loved.

We should all be willing to have a mature, reasonable debate and find some middle ground. There are more concerns than just the pregnant women, there is the man and the unborn not to mention a state citizenry who are also stakeholders in the particular laws and morals we all live by.