The sustainability of Harris’ campaign momentum

a reply to: frogs453

He said the same about Hunter.....for example.

You can say that, and maybe that's how you would do it, hire someone because they are qualified and not overlook because.


Yet the guy has stated his hiring preferences. And in the case of say KBJ, who can't figure out what a woman is, assuming it's because they are the best of the best isn't borne out with facts...

It's not the votes that count, it's who counts the votes.
I don't believe the polls showing Kamal's increasing popularity anymore than the ones that showed Hillary winning by a landslide. They're just brainwashing the undecided non-thinking followers into believing that everyone else prefers Kamal, so she must be the right choice.

Trump will win by a landslide, but propaganda, early and mail-in voting and Dominion will convince the non-thinkers he lost, same as 2020.

Why even one person would vote for another four years of this train wreck is beyond my comprehension.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Oh, I missed the link where he said he hired him because he was gay, even though he's not qualified. Link please? I can only find where he mentioned he's one of the "smartest guys you'll ever meet" and that he's been open about who he is.

So he was willing to hire someone qualified, who happens to be gay, rather than overlook him because he is gay.

Pete seems to be very intelligent, and a great orator. I'm sure if he wants to, he will go far in politics. But as far as his political experience, he was the mayor of a city, and has been hiding from his duty as transportation secretary. Unless you have a list of his accomplishments under that role.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

I mean being a lawyer with multiple years in public service have been the qualifications for like 90% of Presidents.

Ronnie Reagan was an actor with a chimp for a partner, and he did pretty good. But I was just asking, and amazingly enough, I didn't ask you nor Silly, yet you both answered when the Frog did not. Must be a borg thing. Resistance is futile.

It appears you still have an actor with a new chimp for a partner as your candidate.

a reply to: marg6043

Yikes, what did Vance have to do to get that VP position then.

a reply to: quintessentone

But he was voted for.

Can you say the same?

a reply to: network dude

Ah yes, Reagan, the man that killed the middle class. What a great President. In his defense though, he was suffering from Alzheimer's and was essentially a puppet for the MIC.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

Ah yes, Reagan, the man that killed the middle class. What a great President. In his defense though, he was suffering from Alzheimer's and was essentially a puppet for the MIC.

Patiently awaiting the audible *click*...........

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

I mean being a lawyer with multiple years in public service have been the qualifications for like 90% of Presidents.

Ronnie Reagan was an actor with a chimp for a partner, and he did pretty good. But I was just asking, and amazingly enough, I didn't ask you nor Silly, yet you both answered when the Frog did not. Must be a borg thing. Resistance is futile.

It appears you still have an actor with a new chimp for a partner as your candidate.

And the left has a geriatric dementia patient with a DEI hire who polled so low in her own state, she had to drop out before the primaries in 2020, but now that she has done such a wonderful job as border czar, she is ready for the big chair.
I think I'll stick with the actor. Can't wait for the 2028 Brad Pitt/Dylan Mulvainy ticket.

a reply to: network dude

I'll get some for you. But as often happens here, when I address the question with facts, the goalpost moves. Now it's OK, he is qualified, but what has he done now?

Got it. On it.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

Ah yes, Reagan, the man that killed the middle class. What a great President. In his defense though, he was suffering from Alzheimer's and was essentially a puppet for the MIC.

LOL, and I bet you typed that with a serious face on. LOL!!!!

a reply to: network dude

I was thinking more along the lines of Clooney/ De Niro

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

Ah yes, Reagan, the man that killed the middle class. What a great President. In his defense though, he was suffering from Alzheimer's and was essentially a puppet for the MIC.

The same as Biden then?

a reply to: Dandandat3

That's a good question.

Can Harris sustain momentum through November?

It could be like a lower ranked team coming out of halftime and making up a deficit, to keep it a single possession game, but the favorite runs away a bit at the end. Or it could be a Cinderella upset.

Kamala is like said team just got a really motivational gipper speech that reignited them. It's hard to see it sustaining. The buzz will fade if Trump can continuously convince people their life sucks without him.

Harris has to focus where she can.

It's down to getting 4 of 5 of these states.

Minnesota (+6)
Michigan (tied)
Wisconsin (-1)
Pennsylvania (tied)
Arizona (-5)

Is it any coincidence Shapiro, Whitmer, and Kelly are THE VP candidates?

Here is how that momentum can build. We just commit to the gender war thing. Go Harris/Whitmer and run an "All Female Ticket" for "the first time in American history." Dazzle people with the prospect of it.

The issues are right. The opposing candidates are right. The timing is right. And it's only a little Ironic that hypothetical election of (less spoken) religious vs woke values would biologically define male and female.

Let's go *clap clap* cat ladies! *clap clap * let's go cat ladies, LET'S GO!

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

Ah yes, Reagan, the man that killed the middle class. What a great President. In his defense though, he was suffering from Alzheimer's and was essentially a puppet for the MIC.

Patiently awaiting the audible *click*...........

it's posts like that, that make it clear why I come here. that was totally organic, and I doubt I could have made it to that level of snark. I'm an noob.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

I mean being a lawyer with multiple years in public service have been the qualifications for like 90% of Presidents.

Ronnie Reagan was an actor with a chimp for a partner, and he did pretty good. But I was just asking, and amazingly enough, I didn't ask you nor Silly, yet you both answered when the Frog did not. Must be a borg thing. Resistance is futile.

It appears you still have an actor with a new chimp for a partner as your candidate.

And the left has a geriatric dementia patient with a DEI hire who polled so low in her own state, she had to drop out before the primaries in 2020, but now that she has done such a wonderful job as border czar, she is ready for the big chair.
I think I'll stick with the actor. Can't wait for the 2028 Brad Pitt/Dylan Mulvainy ticket.

Some of you here are totally devoid of humor.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: network dude

I was thinking more along the lines of Clooney/ De Niro

De Niro is too old. But Clooney has all that knowledge of how to.........be a leftie I guess?

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Oh please that was a ridiculous question just meant to rile everyone up. As a judge any case that calls that into question would be dealt with in a legal frame within whatever case is presented to them.

And KBJ is certainly more qualified than Comey-Barrett who never even handled a case in a courtroom, was never a judge and worked on a total of 3 legal cases in her entire career. Yet she is not considered a DEI hire. Why is that?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

I mean being a lawyer with multiple years in public service have been the qualifications for like 90% of Presidents.

Ronnie Reagan was an actor with a chimp for a partner, and he did pretty good. But I was just asking, and amazingly enough, I didn't ask you nor Silly, yet you both answered when the Frog did not. Must be a borg thing. Resistance is futile.

It appears you still have an actor with a new chimp for a partner as your candidate.

And the left has a geriatric dementia patient with a DEI hire who polled so low in her own state, she had to drop out before the primaries in 2020, but now that she has done such a wonderful job as border czar, she is ready for the big chair.
I think I'll stick with the actor. Can't wait for the 2028 Brad Pitt/Dylan Mulvaney ticket.

Some of you here are totally devoid of humor.

I beg to differ, I had a smile on my face when I typed the Pitt/Mulvaney thing. And your posts never seem to keep me down, I always smile. Just keep doing your part, and nobody will be sad.

a reply to: network dude

Year younger than Biden, I think that fits the ticket.

Maybe we could see Clooney/DiCaprio