The S.C. Report on JOE BIDEN's Illegal Theft of Highly Classified Documents is Complete.

a reply to: Threadbarer

nypost.com...

As they could not prove he knew, nor did he try to retain them or hide them after it was realized he did have them, it's logical he would not be charged, just like Pence.

I posted a link previously, that Senators have been found to have classified docs after they retire since the 80s. Between 2010 and 2020, there have been over 80 cases. Some are found when Senators are handing over papers to libraries, etc.

The whole system needs to be reevaluated and updated for sure, but again, it's the refusal, lying and obstruction that got Trump in trouble. If he would have turned them all over, even within the 16 months the government was repeatedly requesting them, this would be a non issue.

a reply to: network dude

Over a year later, has Johnson presented anything that supports his suspicion?

a reply to: Threadbarer

other than the facts he brought back then that haven't changed any at all? I don't think so.

eta:
did Hunter prove he didn't sent that message to Archer? He has had a year to do it.

a reply to: Threadbarer

Sure, the usual and as the headline states: "may", "could be", "possibly", "if true".

To the right those words mean "fact" in their mind. Meanwhile, as I've been told here many times that statement of action given during testimony under oath, or text messages and video are all "speculation" and not evidence or fact.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

He was informed by his lawyers that he was likely breaking the law by keeping the documents. He was subpoenaed by the government to turn over the documents. He was informed by his lawyers that he would definitely be breaking the law of he didn't comply with the subpoena.

He still chose to retain the documents.

So his lawyers broke confidentiality by saying all that? Implants!! 😃

Joe had the boxes of classified documents stacked right next to his Corvette (That he emphasized is always in a locked garage roflol), so what did he think was in those boxes every time he took The Vette out for a drive? ROFLOL 😃🤣

a reply to: WingDingLuey
News media is speculating this report COULD help Trump/Republicans.

Duh! Are they still that obtuse and out of touch with how the world operates?

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: WingDingLuey
News media is speculating this report COULD help Trump/Republicans.

Duh! Are they still that obtuse and out of touch with how the world operates?

MSM and White House stuck in a Catch22 endless loop 😀

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

Over a year later, has Johnson presented anything that supports his suspicion?

Years later. Any evidence Trump Russian Collision was a legitimate investigation. Other than Trump was an international businessman and technically “colluded” with many businesses over the world.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

Over a year later, has Johnson presented anything that supports his suspicion?

So. How did Biden get classified documents to improper storage as a senator?

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
(b) For purposes of this section, the provision of documents and materials to the Congress shall not constitute an offense under subsection (a).
(c) In this section, the term “classified information of the United States” means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.
(Added Pub. L. 103–359, title VIII, § 808(a), Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3453; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, § 4002(d)(1)(C)(i), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1809; Pub. L. 115–118, title II, § 202, Jan. 19, 2018, 132 Stat. 19.)

www.law.cornell.edu...

From senator to vice president, how do you not know you removed classified material from its proper location to end up someplace else?

The defense “it was an accident” is BS.

originally posted by: WeMustCare
Some of the report will be kept from the people who pay for all of this..YOU and ME. 😠

Not surprised.
There is no justice in this country.
Or anywhere on the planet for that matter.

a reply to: Lazy88

I think Hur's position is jaded by the "no reasonable prosecutor" rule Comey stated. Sure it's a crime, sure others (peons) have been charged and punished for less than this, Joe Biden is above the law. But other than him, NOBODY is above the law!

a reply to: Lazy88

Senators have access to classified documents.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Lazy88

Senators have access to classified documents.

do they have the right to take them home? If so, can you provide a link.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Lazy88

Senators have access to classified documents.

They don’t have the authority to mishandle them and take them outside classified areas. Like I couldn’t take my material classified confidential out of the school building back to the barracks to study. There never was the benefit of it was an “accident”.

I know…. Wanting to hold leaders to a higher standard that what the common enlisted person is held to and damned for…..

Biden and his attorneys say it's okay for the public to see the report without any redactions. It is going to be released to the public very soon.

www.foxnews.com...

We don't know if any addendums will be kept secret.

a reply to: WeMustCare

So, it’s going to be another “no intent” BS like Hilary.