It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: BlueJacket
Oh yeah. Isn't Talent one of the towns that got burnt to a crisp a couple years back? We seldom get south of Grants Pass.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: KMeRMoRe
NO.
It still costs more to make those changes. More material, more labor, and specialty products that aren't freely available in the market such as reinforced bed frames.
Now, if they want to renovate a few rooms in this way and charge more for them, go for it. Just don't make me pay more because this person has no self-control when it comes to eating.
a reply to: quintessentone
If a person is considered disabled or having mobility issues, no matter the reason, then the accessible room should be accommodating for all people in any situation ... period
There are design strategies for hotel rooms where everyone could be accommodated and most of these require less furniture to free up more space, so, bonus, saving money right there.
originally posted by: KMeRMoRe
These people are not "disabled" they are OVERWEIGHT!
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
Anyone can claim they have disabilities, doesn't mean they have them.
Until she proves what she has, she has none.
Obesity is still not a disability, no matter how many times you try to say it is. Get with the program.
You choose not to believe her because you'd rather fat shame her, typical.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone
You can't assume she has "other illness and disabilities" if nothing is listed in the op.
Now if you would care to add a source that lists all of her illness and "disablitites" that would be a good start for you
I posted a link previously where it she stated that she had disabilities (plural). So she must be accommodated as a disabled person and as she is also extremely obese, for whatever reason which none of us know why she is, that must be accommodated too.
originally posted by: Muldar
Let's see how to deal with this matter.
originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: TrulyColorBlind
In the UK budget airlines came about and they tried for a while to run with a seat throw of 26 inches. Only midgets, oopps sorry, height challenged people, could sit comfortably in them. On a loser, so they changed to 28 inch seat throw. Even that is tight for most people. The industry tried to get them to adopt a 30 inch throw bbuuuttt, 28 inch rather than 30 inch they can get in another 4 rows, kerching.
Outside of the US, the Australian Consumer Law prohibits airlines from charging passengers different amounts based on their body sizes.
Meanwhile, the “one person, one fare” (1p1f) policy, which prevented domestic airlines Air Canada, Air Canada Jazz and WestJet from charging passengers requiring an extra seat for more than one fare, was passed by the Canadian Transportation Agency in 2008.
Obesity is recognized as a disability in Canada, and passengers must be considered “functionally disabled by obesity,” to meet the requirements for a free extra seat.
However, the rule only applies to domestic flights, which means that plus-size travelers still need to buy an extra seat when going on an international flight.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: TrulyColorBlind
In the UK budget airlines came about and they tried for a while to run with a seat throw of 26 inches. Only midgets, oopps sorry, height challenged people, could sit comfortably in them. On a loser, so they changed to 28 inch seat throw. Even that is tight for most people. The industry tried to get them to adopt a 30 inch throw bbuuuttt, 28 inch rather than 30 inch they can get in another 4 rows, kerching.
Well it appears other airlines in other countries than the U.S. have policies in place, such as "one person one fare".
Outside of the US, the Australian Consumer Law prohibits airlines from charging passengers different amounts based on their body sizes.
Meanwhile, the “one person, one fare” (1p1f) policy, which prevented domestic airlines Air Canada, Air Canada Jazz and WestJet from charging passengers requiring an extra seat for more than one fare, was passed by the Canadian Transportation Agency in 2008.
Obesity is recognized as a disability in Canada, and passengers must be considered “functionally disabled by obesity,” to meet the requirements for a free extra seat.
However, the rule only applies to domestic flights, which means that plus-size travelers still need to buy an extra seat when going on an international flight.
www.cnn.com...
The same woman is in the article above, as we can see she needs an oxygen machine, which takes up space. Just that alone should allow her an extra seat because the airline is not providing anywhere else for her to put it or stow it closely when needed.
originally posted by: Muldar
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: TrulyColorBlind
In the UK budget airlines came about and they tried for a while to run with a seat throw of 26 inches. Only midgets, oopps sorry, height challenged people, could sit comfortably in them. On a loser, so they changed to 28 inch seat throw. Even that is tight for most people. The industry tried to get them to adopt a 30 inch throw bbuuuttt, 28 inch rather than 30 inch they can get in another 4 rows, kerching.
Well it appears other airlines in other countries than the U.S. have policies in place, such as "one person one fare".
Outside of the US, the Australian Consumer Law prohibits airlines from charging passengers different amounts based on their body sizes.
Meanwhile, the “one person, one fare” (1p1f) policy, which prevented domestic airlines Air Canada, Air Canada Jazz and WestJet from charging passengers requiring an extra seat for more than one fare, was passed by the Canadian Transportation Agency in 2008.
Obesity is recognized as a disability in Canada, and passengers must be considered “functionally disabled by obesity,” to meet the requirements for a free extra seat.
However, the rule only applies to domestic flights, which means that plus-size travelers still need to buy an extra seat when going on an international flight.
www.cnn.com...
The same woman is in the article above, as we can see she needs an oxygen machine, which takes up space. Just that alone should allow her an extra seat because the airline is not providing anywhere else for her to put it or stow it closely when needed.
That's very different to being obese and make demands. Some people make a disability or a condition that requires them to need oxygen and am oxygen machine.
Obesity isn't a disability or a condition that usually requires you to need oxygen although some obese people do have breathing issues or cardiac related issues and there are accommodated well known hen they travel or go when they go about their lives.