The moment the trans agenda goes off the rails thread

a reply to: network dude

waiting for the big door prize. I bet it will be epic.

Another kind of prize came to mind...

but I'm not even going to go there...

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: carewemust

Here's some new and refreshing information, for a change!

The CDC (remember those crooks?) has announced GUIDANCE ON MEN BREAST-FEEDING BABIES.

Oh my goodness! This is GREAT news!!! This hormonal fluid being produced has little (if any) nutritional value for babies, and it definitely doesn't provide the mother's protective antibodies. It's horrendous that this has been allowed to happen, and I pray that any babies so subjected had someone keeping a close eye on them and supplementing with proper nourishment -- whether genuine breast milk or reputable baby formula.

I would post this breaking news in additional applicable threads, but I've been getting banned a lot lately. Maybe this is worth a thread of its own???

I'm not sure it would stand alone and not just be closed and referred back to this thread. Maybe someone brave will give it a try and find out?

I'm still not up to tending a thread. I can only type so much, and then I've gotta pamper this arm again. It's getting better, but damn it's slow going!!!

Since its an unprecedented determination from our CDC, I'll start a thread in the medical forum.

a reply to: carewemust

That's the best place for it. I'll check it out.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

I totally agree that nobody should be discriminated against. But the universal "acceptance" of this 'thing' is a problem as I see it. Feeding a sick person's delusion just seems unhealthy. I'm not a psychiatrist, so have no evidence to back up my concern, but knowing that person who wished to "transition" wants to become the other sex, but never will, is wrong. If there was a way to do this for real, it would be different. But ultimately, this is a part of the topic for professionals, who have been eerily silent on this.

You're so right - and this is getting into 'misfit' territory -
It is odd, for instance, that Bruce Jenner transitioned to becoming a woman, and is dating women, but does not consider herself to be a lesbian.
I just don't understand any of it, not that I have to, but another example is a clerk at our local supermarket with long dark hair and nails. I thought I was speaking to a woman, but it is a man.
It must be an unhappy situation for those who feel trapped in the body of another gender, but honestly it never entered my mind until the recent explosion of reports on this confusing subject.

As part of a psychology major I had a fairly experimental human sexuality class in the early 80's. Even then there was early academic pressure towards woke.

When the professor asserted that a female could be born in the wrong (male) body I didn't overtly disagree--or guffaw--but I did make the observation that if such a thing were true then it would also be possible that the former male could also be lesbian. The professor jumped to agree. The class guffawed.

Two decades later and well past any crazy desire to work in mental health I was working in TV and film production. In this instance I was helping a woke friend shoot a documentary on a young lady who was about to have a mastectomy and various transitioning stuff on her journey to manhood as it were.

Her parents were very supportive ultra-woke University of Florida professors. So I got to know them during the filming. She was intelligent, adorable, a fox as a girl...and confused as hell. Her parents seemed to be pushing for it all in a hurried way which disturbed me.

At some point after the breast removal she was pretty miserable and stopped dating women completely. Her choice of mates were...gay males. It brought me back to my comment in the human sexuality class.

I can't remember the name of the film---it was UoF sponsored partially and played a few festivals. Probably could google if interested. I sincerely hope it all worked out for her.

the problem with these things is they end up being hijacked and they start to collapse when the real agenda become visible which it always does with so many parts in motion, as it did when the pedos hijacked the gay rights movement in the 70s and 80s..

originally posted by: The GUT
As part of a psychology major I had a fairly experimental human sexuality class in the early 80's. Even then there was early academic pressure towards woke.

When the professor asserted that a female could be born in the wrong (male) body I didn't overtly disagree--or guffaw--but I did make the observation that if such a thing were true then it would also be possible that the former male could also be lesbian. The professor jumped to agree. The class guffawed.

Two decades later and well past any crazy desire to work in mental health I was working in TV and film production. In this instance I was helping a woke friend shoot a documentary on a young lady who was about to have a mastectomy and various transitioning stuff on her journey to manhood as it were.

Her parents were very supportive ultra-woke University of Florida professors. So I got to know them during the filming. She was intelligent, adorable, a fox as a girl...and confused as hell. Her parents seemed to be pushing for it all in a hurried way which disturbed me.

At some point after the breast removal she was pretty miserable and stopped dating women completely. Her choice of mates were...gay males. It brought me back to my comment in the human sexuality class.

I can't remember the name of the film---it was UoF sponsored partially and played a few festivals. Probably could google if interested. I sincerely hope it all worked out for her.

Only some questionable psychologists and sociologists can make these bogus claims, men and women can be born in the wrong body. Then these bogus and utterly antiscientific ideas are followed by the and woke crowd.

a reply to: AlienBorg

Well....

There is another theory, which you would probably label as "woo woo".

If we are reincarnated, it could be a matter of "remembering" a souls past life, in which they were the opposite sex.

If that is the case, it seems we are handling the whole situation wrong.

Just something to think about.

a reply to: chiefsmom

Ive wondered about that as well.

In fact, I challenge people that believe a woman can be trapped in a man's body (and versa) but don't believe in a soul (many are atheists too). If all the DNA in the body is the same, how can the 'person' be 'trapped'?

Edit: My whole life, I'd rather be friends with males. Maybe I'm a gay man reincarnated into a female body, so it all worked out nicely!

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: network dude

waiting for the big door prize. I bet it will be epic.

Another kind of prize came to mind...

but I'm not even going to go there...

Can I go there? Did you mean boobie prize?

a reply to: quintessentone

Can I go there? Did you mean boobie prize?

LOL! Too late now -- you already did!

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

Guys in dresses should not be the foundation for policy change.

No but discrimination should.

Who's being discriminated against?

Guys that want to get naked in girls locker rooms?

Good.

Those who have issues with it need to advocate for trans locker rooms. Society moves very slowly with changes.

Why not advocate to also remove lesbians from women's locker rooms too? Where is that outrage?

The discrimination goes way beyond locker rooms and you know it.

Just like the physicality of sports, a guy in the women’s locker room, bathroom, shower, is way more of a physical threat than 99 out of 100 women.
I don’t think very many women are worried about lesbians fantasizing. It’s about physical threats and decency among decent company, especially kids.

originally posted by: nickyw
the problem with these things is they end up being hijacked and they start to collapse when the real agenda become visible which it always does with so many parts in motion, as it did when the pedos hijacked the gay rights movement in the 70s and 80s..

The whole LGBT spectrum is a vehicle to express various mental illnesses, and browbeat the mentally stable into letting them get away with any and all sick behaviors.
Simple old gay seems quaint now, but it opened the door. Of course all they wanted was gay marriage.
Look at what it metastasized into.
Pedos, necro, and bestiality have one foot through the door. They will be approved by the lunatic mob before you know it, probably to include the pope.
Just look at the way they screech, howl, attack people, talk gibberish and nonsense. Garden variety mental illness traits. Using gender / sexuality idiocy as a delivery vehicle.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: chiefsmom

Ive wondered about that as well.

In fact, I challenge people that believe a woman can be trapped in a man's body (and versa) but don't believe in a soul (many are atheists too). If all the DNA in the body is the same, how can the 'person' be 'trapped'?

Edit: My whole life, I'd rather be friends with males. Maybe I'm a gay man reincarnated into a female body, so it all worked out nicely!

I’m atheist. That means one thing only “I lack belief in a god/deity”. Lack belief without proof.

There are Spiritual Atheists that believe something more is going on, but not because of a god.

I support science. The newish science of brain scans is telling us there is “gender brain”. The brain tells you who you are, not the physical wrappings.

a reply to: Annee

Your brain has the same DNA as your ass.

Sorry, but thats the facts.

a reply to: AlienBorg

I’d rather be WOKE than STUCK.

At one time seizures were being processed by the Devil.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: Annee

Your brain has the same DNA as your ass.

Sorry, but thats the facts.

Did I say anything about DNA?

a reply to: Annee

Then what is the non-DNA part of the body?

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
a reply to: Annee

Then what is the non-DNA part of the body?

Not what, but how each “area” functions.

The way you’re presenting it is like a checkerboard with all the pieces present — just sitting there with no function.

a reply to: Annee

But isn't the DNA the 'program' code for all those functions?