-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions ---WHO WILL PUT AN END TO THE ENDLESS?--- -Part- --42--

a reply to: OveRcuRrEnteD

Don't wanna be that guy but yes, if we're being honest, there absolutely are fascist ideologies that span both sides of the political aisle. People have been led to believe that right wing and left wing are opposing factions of government. The true polar opposite of any government party is zero government party. Democrats and Republicans are on the same side of the true divide.

CLIP

a reply to: crankyoldman

Elon Musk Says Neuralink Is The Only Way To Survive And Compete With AI

Elon Musk, the genius behind SpaceX and Tesla Inc., has declared that humanity must embrace the merging of man and machine if we hope to survive in a world dominated by artificial intelligence (AI).

Musk believes that by merging with AI, humans will be able to keep up with the rapid advancements in technology and compete against AI. He argues that rather than trying to beat machines, humans should join them. Neuralink's ultimate goal is to create a world where humans and AI work together in harmony, augmenting each other's abilities and achieving more than people can on their own.

www.google.com...

Does he have an agenda? I believe so. And its not to free humanity.

originally posted by: OveRcuRrEnteD
a reply to: loveguy
...because the right wing are the fascists lol. Substitute "right wing" and "QAnon" with "left wing" and "trans activist" and it is spot on. It seems Gen. Flynn saw what was coming. Who is Jim Stewartson? His opinion is comical at this point

Anti-disinformation activist, pissed off Twitter exile

Writing, research and podcast for understanding and resisting the propaganda, psyops and malicious actors assaulting global liberal democracy. #IAmAntiFascist

I saw this before, Poso reposted it for some reason, incoherent.

Spawned from the same pod as all the dedicated shills and trolls who devote this life to... whatever it is that they deem in the moment, like this guy... His entire life, look at him, a dressed up teenager expert on the world using every. single. CIA. device ever created.



Many like him, pathetic on almost every level.... but... while they think they serve to debunk for their masters, they actually serve as contrast - in the way a drug addict reminds those who are not that it was a good choice to avoid that path. Useful idiots to both sides, disposable in the end.

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
a reply to: OveRcuRrEnteD

Don't wanna be that guy but yes, if we're being honest, there absolutely are fascist ideologies that span both sides of the political aisle. People have been led to believe that right wing and left wing are opposing factions of government. The true polar opposite of any government party is zero government party. Democrats and Republicans are on the same side of the true divide.

I don't disagree with you and thanks for being "that guy" that made it clear.

Just saw this article today


Elon Musk reportedly planning to launch AI rival to ChatGPT maker

Elon Musk is reportedly planning to launch an artificial intelligence company to compete with OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, as Silicon Valley battles for dominance in the rapidly developing technology.

The billionaire boss of Tesla and Twitter is in the process of bringing together a team of AI researchers and engineers and is in talks with several investors about the project, according to the Financial Times.

A bunch of people are investing in it …  it’s real and they are excited about it,” a person with knowledge of the talks told the newspaper, which cited Nevada business records showing that on 9 March Musk incorporated a company called X.AI of which he is the company’s sole director.

In company filings, Musk recently changed the name of Twitter to X Corp. The move was part of his plans to make an “everything app” branded “X”.

For the new AI project, Musk has reportedly got thousands of high-powered GPU processors and is also said to have recruited engineers from leading AI labs, such as DeepMind.

www.google.com...

a reply to: crankyoldman

"pissed off twitter exile" made me chuckle. "global liberal democracy" was a double facepalm. I should have looked at the author before I wasted 10 mins reading that although I probably would have read it anyway for the lulz

Google Brain Needs DeepMind

What could be the reason behind Google’s parent company Alphabet having two AI research wings under it – Google Brain and DeepMind? Ironically, both these companies have different philosophies and approaches towards AI. This, over the past few years, has resulted in small feuds between them. But together, they are stronger than ever, and now might be the perfect time for them to align and compete against rivals.

Guess what? It’s already happening!

Google and DeepMind are collaborating on a next-generation project called the Gemini. According to a report from The Information, both companies are “pausing grudges” and joining forces to go beyond what OpenAI has achieved or planning to achieve. The project is led by Jeff Dean, head of Google Brain.

DeepMind also has another LLM called Chinchilla, which powered Flamingo. But none of the LLMs is publicly available. In January, DeepMind announced that it will soon release Sparrow, a chatbot that does things that ChatGPT cannot. But since then, the company has been suspiciously quiet on this front. We say, the Google-DeepMind partnership would be a befitting reply to Microsoft-OpenAI.

There might be a clash between DeepMind’s and Google’s philosophy towards AI. DeepMind’s philosophy is started by Hassabis’ research-based approach. Though he has been the one who drove AI development all these years through AlphaFold, and several other innovations, he agrees with the notion that such “powerful AI technology” poses a potential danger and can cause significant damage to humanity.

analyticsindiamag.com...


Fourth Industrial Revolution

The Fourth Industrial Revolution, 4IR, or Industry 4.0, conceptualises rapid change to technology, industries, and societal patterns and processes in the 21st century due to increasing interconnectivity and smart automation. The term was popularised in 2015 by Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum founder and executive chairman, and has since been used in numerous economic, political, and scientific articles in reference to the current era of emerging high technology. Schwab asserts that the changes seen are more than just improvements to efficiency, but express a significant shift in industrial capitalism.

en.m.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
Elon Musk Says Neuralink Is The Only Way To Survive And Compete With AI

Pulling the plug on A.I. and working at making PEOPLE smarter is a much better option and much better value me thinks.

Damn these Meglomaniacs. Did he breed a baby just to plug "it" in?

So Elons move to rename Twitter, can for the third time (I think, maybe more) be linked into comic books. X-Corp was a short lived series about mutants founding a company for their people. Here is an excerpt from the Wikipedia.

A business delegation representing the nation of Krakoa debuted as part of Reign of X in 2021. X-Corp will handle the mutantkind's business interests and has expanded into two branches:[2]

X-Corp Pharma: Research, development, and production of Krakoa's pharmaceuticals.

X-Corp Telecom: Development of the Ionospheric Bandwidth Generator for faster communication. The mutant circuit of Vulcan, Bishop, Thunderbird and Sunspot activates the generator.

link A little ironic if you ask me.

Have you Driven a Ford lately

ITs a Thing

The Industrial Military Complex

what could go wrong

China protests US sanctioning of firms dealing with Russia

Beijing is protesting U.S. sanctions against additional Chinese companies over their alleged attempts to evade U.S. export controls on Russia, calling it an illegal move that endangers global supply chains

GOoD Vs evil - nothing else

Mental Pause

Trudeau's top aide tight-lipped on Chinese election meddling in Canada, citing security




Digest that

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
a reply to: crankyoldman

Elon Musk Says Neuralink Is The Only Way To Survive And Compete With AI

Elon Musk, the genius behind SpaceX and Tesla Inc., has declared that humanity must embrace the merging of man and machine if we hope to survive in a world dominated by artificial intelligence (AI).

Does he have an agenda? I believe so. And its not to free humanity.

You missed the definitions then.

RIGHT WING means no government at all. Anarchy if it goes too far. It cant be Marxist as it is the exact opposite

Left wing is for ALL GOV ALL THE TIME (or Marxism).


The best is a balance, right?

We have a Uniparty that pretends to be opposites and that is the thing you are seeing. People on ATS are just picking those who are for less gov not Anarchy or the Marxist opposite.

I hope that makes sense!

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
a reply to: OveRcuRrEnteD

Don't wanna be that guy but yes, if we're being honest, there absolutely are fascist ideologies that span both sides of the political aisle. People have been led to believe that right wing and left wing are opposing factions of government. The true polar opposite of any government party is zero government party. Democrats and Republicans are on the same side of the true divide.

a reply to: Justoneman

I don't know about right wing in general but right wing here in the U.S. does not mean no government at all. Obviously, the Republican party is a governing entity with elected officials and constituents. Zero government would mean literally no governing party at all. I suppose another way of looking at it is grading the Republican & Democrat parties on two separate sliding scales from 1 to 10. 1 being the least amount of government and 10 being the most restrictive, controlling abusive form of government you can imagine. You may not believe it but both sides are very capable of sliding into authoritarian dictatorship when corruption is rampant as we're witnessing right now--like you said, a uniparty that pretends to be opposites. The right will tell you they stand for less government and continue playing "good cop bad cop" with the left but when it comes down to it, they won't relinquish control if it means they have to sacrifice power. And we're about to find out how compromised our government really is. Both sides.

The only way people will ever get less government is by learning how to govern themselves. But people are too willing to hand over control and decision making to "experts" and "authority figures". That's how we get into this mess over and over again.

Ok, we can pick the Media definitions or the real ones.

RIGHT WING are anarchists who want NO GOV AT ALL.

None are RW here at all. We who are not left are moderates that look like RW nutjobs to the brainwashed left nutjobs coming here professing lies as truth.

originally posted by: socialmediaclown
a reply to: Justoneman

I don't know about right wing in general but right wing here in the U.S. does not mean no government at all. Obviously, the Republican party is a governing entity with elected officials and constituents. Zero government would mean literally no governing party at all. I suppose another way of looking at it is grading the Republican & Democrat parties on two separate sliding scales from 1 to 10. 1 being the least amount of government and 10 being the most restrictive, controlling abusive form of government you can imagine. You may not believe it but both sides are very capable of sliding into authoritarian dictatorship when corruption is rampant as we're witnessing right now--like you said, a uniparty that pretends to be opposites. The right will tell you they stand for less government and continue playing "good cop bad cop" with the left but when it comes down to it, they won't relinquish control if it means they have to sacrifice power. And we're about to find out how compromised our government really is. Both sides.

The only way people will ever get less government is by learning how to govern themselves. But people are too willing to hand over control and decision making to "experts" and "authority figures". That's how we get into this mess over and over again.

a reply to: Justoneman

'cordin' to the media, we're "Q Anon".

MSM can KMA. I'll define myself.

Cheers

a reply to: MetalThunder
twitter.com...
Pip

a reply to: Justoneman

In technical terms anarchy is considered a political philosophy so I don't know if it can really be considered no government at all. My idea of zero government is a civilization of individuals who practice self-mastery to the point that there is no need for a centralized authority. Everyone has reached an elevated consciousness with full capability of governing themselves.

Anarchy to me seems to be a period of instability after a government collapse before people reorganize themselves into a new form of centralized rule of law. Anarchy doesn't last because it's chaos and lawlessness. People on this planet currently can't govern themselves because we aren't unified on a higher level of consciousness.

There are different forms of anarchy that can happen on either side of the political divide:

Anarcho-Communism -- left wing
Anarcho-Capitalism -- right wing
Anarcho-Socialism -- "is a branch of anarchism that can be interpreted as the culmination of the previous two branches".

originally posted by: Justoneman
a reply to: crankyoldman

IF, and only if the Robot laws are coded into the operating system would that have to be so. If it is not coded in there as you are pointing out may not be the case with AI, then all bets are off for Asimov's Robot Laws.

Tons of respect for Isaac Asimov.

But I would suggest that when he wrote about the three laws of robotics he was thinking in terms of simple physical interactions. He was thinking of what robots would be allowed to do, or not do, with their synthetic bodies. The early thinking on robots was in terms of fancy machines, that they would be mankind’s mechanical workers, kind of like the Jetson’s robot maid. (1960’s TV reference)

Asimov missed, or chose not to address, a few things. (The three rules of robot risks )

First, that robots would immediately become weapons of war, because humans weaponize every single new technology that can be weaponized.

Second, Asimov wrote I, Robot in 1950 before computers revealed their potential. He missed that artificial intelligence would be the major threat-- that AI could sift through vast databases of information, process that information, draw conclusions and act on them.

Third, the saying garbage in, garbage out, applies. Imperfect humans with sloppy thinking and biased values cannot program perfect robots with brilliant moral thinking. Eventually, computers will program newer computers, but initial programming weaknesses are likely to get passed down through the generations like original sin.

Asimov was concerned with what robots did, and not so much what they “thought.” But once you add a simulation of “thinking” into the dynamic…

I have always said humans can think any old crazy idea and come up with some twisted logic to justify it. The real danger is that robots (computers) are likely to do exactly the same thing.
.