Impending Invasion of Ukraine from Belarus Will Likely Force NATO to Act

a reply to: JinMI


Did Ukraine go on a land grabbing neighbor invasion?

Or launch 100 missiles at civilian and energy infrastructure targets?



Weren't russia supporters claiming that russia never does that only 24 hours ago?

a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

My "ilk"?

Encouraging "the escalation"?

You mean by standing up to a World class bully?

History is calling you.

Pick up.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

My "ilk"?

Encouraging "the escalation"?

You mean by standing up to a World class bully?

History is calling you.

Pick up.

Apparantly bombing 100 civilian targets far from the war zone in the largest terror attacks since hitler's 'vengeance' weapons, isn't considered an 'escalation'.


I wonder if they would be saying the same thing if Ukraine sent 100 missiles at civilian targets in dozens of russian cities deep inside russia?

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: TrueAmerican

I think the involvement of Belarus is not unexpected at this stage with Russia in need of troops , I doubt it will concern NATO.

What will concern NATO is the appointment of Sergei Surovikin as commander in Ukraine , implicated in the Biological weapon attacks in Syria and ordering the shooting of pro democracy protesters he is considered a bit of a bad lad.

Stage 3.

Well cool. No concern from NATO. I see. So this should not concern anyone either:
twitter.com...

"A known Belarussian source tells me:"

"“Russian soldiers are entering Belarus by the trainload. They’re traveling in cattle cars - just a huge quantity. Just waves of trains arriving.”

So nothing to see here folks, move right along. Ok. Let 'em build up then. No problemo. Just like last time.

a reply to: MidnightWatcher

I was actually thinking about the comparison of this and Hitler's V weapons.

Seems the same to me.

And they talk of Ukrainian Nazis?

Sickening hypocrisy.

originally posted by: Salamandy
a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

i could link to articles all day and you know that

nato, as i have stated, is a trouble maker and does nothing but provoke violence. show me a source where they havent butted in a stoked unnecessary flames? or do you just buy into the hate for msm's latest boogie man?

Let's not forget that China and Russia are also members of the Boogieman club.

originally posted by: TrueAmerican
"“Russian soldiers are entering Belarus by the trainload. They’re traveling in cattle cars - just a huge quantity. Just waves of trains arriving.”

So nothing to see here folks, move right along. Ok. Let 'em build up then. No problemo. Just like last time.

Given from comments ive read around, UA has 8 fresh brigades and 30,000 freshly trained infantry in the UK, back and ready to go... throw in the norths a fortified position, the bridges are all out I believe up there and you'll have presighted artillery ready to go.

And the fact the last time the ruZZians came that way they got trounced due to logistic issues (that appear to still be there) and muddy terrain and that was when UA wasnt prepared...

ruZZia is stupid, and stupid is as stupid does... and boy do they do. (Same with wasting what few missiles they still have on a tantrum towards civilian targets).

Like I said last night in another thread... this is nothing but the start of the thrashing of the ruZZian corpse in its death throws. The last release of energy before it flops down limp for ever... pure blind desperation in its final moments.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

My "ilk"?

Encouraging "the escalation"?

You mean by standing up to a World class bully?

History is calling you.

Pick up.

Ukraine is calling armchair soldiers like you. They are enlisting foreigners

When are you going ?

Pick up !!!!

We can’t let an egomaniacal lunatic, Putin, always threaten the world with nukes if he doesn’t get his way…
And never forget Putin and the Russian elite well understands that NATO has as many and as lethal WMDs as Putin does.
So, a WWIII, although frightening, surely, might not go to nukes since both sides can destroy the world in minutes.

Our only hope is sane people on both sides take over. Hopefully, some on the Russian side will take out Putin if he really considers using nukes.

Just goes to show us that the real issue is The total elimination of nuclear weapons on the planet


BTW, I doubt Belarus's small army can be that determining.

a reply to: peaceinoutz

So, a WWIII, although frightening, surely, might not go to nukes since both sides can destroy the world in minutes.

Except Putin is coming to the end of his reign and probably knows that eventually ends in his death, so the man has nothing left to lose, it would end up in a repeated exchange of nuked cities all over the world in all likelihood, tit for tat until the world is plunged into a bad movie set

Again as much as i dislike any country invading another, we need to let them handle their own business

Liberals USE to be all on board for this, watching the left turn into blood thirsty warhawks is the glaring reality of their hypocrisy

The MSM tells them what to be outraged about and they comply like good little robots, most on the left never even knew where Ukraine was or what happened in that countries history until this last Feburary

a reply to: TrueAmerican

As a Natural Born American Citizen , I Refuse to Support my Present Federal Government if they are Insane Enough to Even Consider using Nuclear Weapons in a Conflict Overseas that does Not in Any Way Threaten the Borders of the United States . NATO has Gone Rouge , and the Majority of the American People DO NOT Support such Actions ..

a reply to: Zanti Misfit


Is anyone in our government considering the use of nukes under such circumstances?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: MidnightWatcher

I was actually thinking about the comparison of this and Hitler's V weapons.

Seems the same to me.

And they talk of Ukrainian Nazis?

Sickening hypocrisy.

It's the same thing, done for the same reason.

It also has the same potential to change the outcome of the war, zero.



Here is that section of the Budapest agreement that someone told you doesn't exist yesterday:

The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used.

a reply to: CrazyWater

Except Putin is coming to the end of his reign and probably knows that eventually ends in his death, so the man has nothing left to lose, it would end up in a repeated exchange of nuked cities all over the world in all likelihood, tit for tat until the world is plunged into a bad movie set

It's called MAD—Mutually Assured Destruction.

That’s WHY the lesson in this is not a perennial debate about a nuke war which we all know would be the end of civilization and likely all life on the planet but the absolutely forbidding any country from having any nuclear weapons…

As I said, our ONLY hope is that Russia, like the US hopefully, and all the nuke countries have in place something to prevent a madman from starting a life and world-ending nuke war. That's a very fragile thing to depend on, but that's about it.

WHEN ARE WE GOING TO WAKE UP AND DEMAND THEY GET RID OF ALL NUKES!!!!

DO WE REALIZE THE UTTER ENORMITY OF THESE CRAZY WEAPONS?

I guess not.
Now...the lunatic in North Korea has nukes, and he's an absolute dictator.

originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
a reply to: Zanti Misfit


Is anyone in our government considering the use of nukes under such circumstances?

You heard Crazy Joe , he's Itching to and so is that Retired Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt . They are Seriously Considering it !

a reply to: Zanti Misfit


"Now...the lunatic in North Korea has nukes, and he's an absolute dictator."


Seems putin is an even larger lunatic, kim hasn't actually invaded anyone yet.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
a reply to: Zanti Misfit


Is anyone in our government considering the use of nukes under such circumstances?

You heard Crazy Joe , he's Itching to and so is that Retired Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt . They are Seriously Considering it !

Have any evidence of that?

Or just a rumor started by a retired guy?

a reply to: TrueAmerican

Ukraine isn't worth nuclear war with Russia, sorry not sorry, but it isnt.

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: TrueAmerican

Ukraine isn't worth nuclear war with Russia, sorry not sorry, but it isnt.

Only putin is threatening nuclear war, not Ukraine or anyone in the 'west'.

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Nexttimemaybe

My "ilk"?

Encouraging "the escalation"?

You mean by standing up to a World class bully?

History is calling you.

Pick up.

Ukraine is calling armchair soldiers like you. They are enlisting foreigners

When are you going ?

Pick up !!!!

So is russia.

Your point?