It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: gortex
Lieutenant General (Retired) Ben Hodges sums up the counter-offensive.
This map puts Ukrainian gains into perspective.
originally posted by: TritonTaranis
DEVELOPING
Looks like the war is going to a new place - civilian infrastructure
Russian Cruise missile strikes on thermal power-plant takes out power for Kharkov Oblast
Also it looks like Ukraine retaliated with ATACAMS now Belgrod Russia is Blackout
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
originally posted by: TritonTaranis
DEVELOPING
Looks like the war is going to a new place - civilian infrastructure
Russian Cruise missile strikes on thermal power-plant takes out power for Kharkov Oblast
Also it looks like Ukraine retaliated with ATACAMS now Belgrod Russia is Blackout
Ukraine is within easy HIMARS, and probably Excalibur range of belgorod now, ATACMS aren't necessary for that.
Also it looks like Ukraine retaliated with ATACAMS now Belgrod Russia is Blackout
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
a reply to: TritonTaranis
My only point is that HIMARS has the same accuracy at that range.
I don't really care what they use to hit them, but IF they have ATACMS, it's better to use them on the Crimea bridge.
Either way, russia is using weapons in belgorod to attack civilians in Ukraine, making belgorod fair game for any kind of Ukrainian attack.
originally posted by: TritonTaranis
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
a reply to: TritonTaranis
My only point is that HIMARS has the same accuracy at that range.
I don't really care what they use to hit them, but IF they have ATACMS, it's better to use them on the Crimea bridge.
Either way, russia is using weapons in belgorod to attack civilians in Ukraine, making belgorod fair game for any kind of Ukrainian attack.
Yeah i wont argue with that bud, however
Excalibur range is like 35 miles
ATACMS is like 190 miles 300km id say more unofficially "due to treaties and such"
Do both
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
originally posted by: TritonTaranis
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
a reply to: TritonTaranis
My only point is that HIMARS has the same accuracy at that range.
I don't really care what they use to hit them, but IF they have ATACMS, it's better to use them on the Crimea bridge.
Either way, russia is using weapons in belgorod to attack civilians in Ukraine, making belgorod fair game for any kind of Ukrainian attack.
Yeah i wont argue with that bud, however
Excalibur range is like 35 miles
ATACMS is like 190 miles 300km id say more unofficially "due to treaties and such"
Do both
I'm good with all of the above, whatever it takes to take out their launchers and aircraft.
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
a reply to: TritonTaranis
What are they waiting for?
biden's permission?
Thanks for the NAFU earlier, I had never heard that term before and had to look it up.
I was referring to the Ukrainian promise to not use American weapons on russian soil without clearing it with the U.S. first.
All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near........
Sun tzu,
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Do people actually think Ukraine can win this war and that its not a US proxy war designed to be sustained and not won?
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Do people actually think Ukraine can win this war and that its not a US proxy war des
igned to be sustained and not won?
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Do people actually think Ukraine can win this war and that its not a US proxy war designed to be sustained and not won?