UK Bans COVID Vax for Kids – Vaccine Harms Sexual Development in Little Boys

"A cytotoxic T cell (also known as TC, cytotoxic T lymphocyte, CTL, T-killer cell, cytolytic T cell, CD8+ T-cell or killer T cell) is a T lymphocyte (a type of white blood cell) that kills cancer cells, cells that are infected by intracellular pathogens (such as viruses or bacteria), or cells that are damaged in other ways.[1]

Most cytotoxic T cells express T-cell receptors (TCRs) that can recognize a specific antigen. An antigen is a molecule capable of stimulating an immune response and is often produced by cancer cells, viruses, bacteria or intracellular signals. Antigens inside a cell are bound to class I MHC molecules, and brought to the surface of the cell by the class I MHC molecule, where they can be recognized by the T cell. If the TCR is specific for that antigen, it binds to the complex of the class I MHC molecule and the antigen, and the T cell destroys the cell. "

link

These DESTROY CELLS upon finding infected cells...........

" Replication-deficient adenovirus vectors are also potent inducers of both antibodies as well as cytotoxic T cells; the latter can clear virus-infected host cells and contribute to the control of infection, alleviating disease symptoms4,14. Importantly, high-frequency T cell responses targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein have been detected in patients who recover from COVID-19, with recent data suggesting a role for T cells during COVID-19"

link

Well would you look at that .....the "vaccine" induces cd8 killer t cell response .... that means ANY CELL that is infected by the ADENO VIRUS IN THE VACCINE or....with the MRNA....these cells WILL be destroyed. IF thats your heart.....thats not good. If thats your brain....thats really not so good.

a reply to: thethinkingman

And how does the above constitute the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine being gene therapy given that the vaccine functions by using "a harmless virus that has been altered to have the SARS-CoV-2 protein" on its surface alone?

Where are the deliberate changes made to the DNA given that the vaccine never enters the nucleus of the cell or interacts with the person's DNA?

Gene therapies permanently change a cells DNA, are you claiming that's what the viral vector AstraZeneca vaccine or any other COVID-19 mRNA vaccine does?

"COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 encodes a mutant viral spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2, with two point mutations inserted to lock S in an antigenically preferred prefusion conformation (P2 S). It is formulated as an RNA-lipid nanoparticle of nucleosidemodified mRNA containing N1-methylpseudouridine instead of uridine. Encapsulation into lipid nanoparticles enables transfection of the mRNA into host cells after intramuscular injection. During mixing of the RNA and the dissolved lipids, the lipids form the nanoparticles encapsulating the RNA. After injection, the lipid nanoparticles are taken up by the cells, and the RNA is released into the cytosol. In the cytosol, the RNA is translated into the encoded viral protein. The viral spike (S) protein antigen induces an adaptive immune response through neutralising antibodies. Furthermore, as the expressed spike (S) protein is being degraded intracellularly, the resulting peptides can be presented at the cell surface, triggering a specific T cell-mediated immune response with activity against the virus and infected cells."

This is explaining how the nanoparticles enter ANY cell they encounter, it also speaks of....T CELL immune reaction.

"ALC-0315 is the functional cationic lipid component of the drug product. When incorporated in lipid nanoparticles, it helps regulate the endosomal release of the RNA. During drug product manufacturing, introduction of an aqueous RNA solution to an ethanolic lipid mixture containing ALC-0315 at a specific pH leads to an electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged RNA backbone and the positively charged cationic lipid. This electrostatic interaction leads to encapsulation of RNA drug substance resulting with particle formation. Once the lipid nanoparticle is taken up by the cell, the low pH of the endosome renders the LNP fusogenic and allows the release of the RNA into the cytosol.

The primary function of the PEGylated lipid ALC-0159 is to form a protective hydrophilic layer that sterically stabilises the LNP which contributes to storage stability and reduces nonspecific binding to proteins. As higher PEG content can reduce cellular uptake and interaction with the endosomal membrane, PEG content is controlled."

linkypop

....put 2 and 2 together....foreign material enters cell....starts hijacking your protein manufacturing aparatus ......this triggers an immune response to stop that....that response is cd8 killer t cells DESTROYING those cells.... if these are capable of going all around the body....then your the immune attacks could be so random depending on where this stuff goes in each persons body.

a reply to: thethinkingman

It's you that's putting two and two together and coming up with a pile of steaming anti-vax Qanonacrap. LoL

Any road its my bedtime now, wedding to attend tomorrow, so must brush up and trundle on.

Have fun with your Chimpanzee Adenoviruses.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: thethinkingman

And how does the above constitute the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine being gene therapy given that the vaccine functions by using "a harmless virus that has been altered to have the SARS-CoV-2 protein" on its surface alone?

Where are the deliberate changes made to the DNA given that the vaccine never enters the nucleus of the cell or interacts with the person's DNA?

Gene therapies permanently change a cells DNA, are you claiming that's what the viral vector AstraZeneca vaccine or any other COVID-19 mRNA vaccine does?

"The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine is based on the virus’s genetic instructions for building the spike protein. But unlike the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, which store the instructions in single-stranded RNA, the Oxford vaccine uses double-stranded DNA.

The researchers added the gene for the coronavirus spike protein to another virus called an adenovirus. Adenoviruses are common viruses that typically cause colds or flu-like symptoms. The Oxford-AstraZeneca team used a modified version of a chimpanzee adenovirus, known as ChAdOx1. It can enter cells, but it can’t replicate inside them.

After the vaccine is injected into a person’s arm, the adenoviruses bump into cells and latch onto proteins on their surface. The cell engulfs the virus in a bubble and pulls it inside. Once inside, the adenovirus escapes from the bubble and travels to the nucleus, the chamber where the cell’s DNA is stored.

The adenovirus pushes its DNA into the nucleus. The adenovirus is engineered so it can’t make copies of itself (not completely true, there are some replicating adeno viruses in the batches), but the gene for the coronavirus spike protein can be read by the cell and copied into a molecule called messenger RNA, or mRNA.

The mRNA leaves the nucleus, and the cell’s molecules read its sequence and begin assembling spike proteins.

Some of the spike proteins produced by the cell form spikes that migrate to its surface and stick out their tips. The vaccinated cells also break up some of the proteins into fragments, which they present on their surface. These protruding spikes and spike protein fragments can then be recognized by the immune system.

The adenovirus also provokes the immune system by switching on the cell’s alarm systems. The cell sends out warning signals to activate immune cells nearby. By raising this alarm, the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine causes the immune system to react more strongly to the spike proteins.

When a vaccinated cell dies, the debris contains spike proteins and protein fragments that can then be taken up by a type of immune cell called an antigen-presenting cell. "

....WHEN A VACCINATED CELL DIES????????

"The cell presents fragments of the spike protein on its surface. When other cells called helper T cells detect these fragments, the helper T cells can raise the alarm and help marshal other immune cells to fight the infection.

Other immune cells, called B cells, may bump into the coronavirus spikes on the surface of vaccinated cells, or free-floating spike protein fragments. A few of the B cells may be able to lock onto the spike proteins. If these B cells are then activated by helper T cells, they will start to proliferate and pour out antibodies that target the spike protein.

The antibodies can latch onto coronavirus spikes, mark the virus for destruction and prevent infection by blocking the spikes from attaching to other cells.

The antigen-presenting cells can also activate another type of immune cell called a killer T cell to seek out and destroy any coronavirus-infected cells that display the spike protein fragments on their surfaces. "

LINKY

again you absolutely have no grasp about whats being said. The adeno virus does not have spike proteins on its surface.....it makes your cells produce spike proteins by instructing your cells with a gene. See the part where it says the DNA adeno virus enters the NUCLEUS of your cell????????? are you gonna keep skipping over everything you get wrong??? cause like this # is way too easy.

a reply to: thethinkingman

Again "the mRNA from the vaccines does not enter the cell nucleus or interact with the DNA at all, so it does not constitute gene therapy.".

But please feel free to continue to prattle on.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: face23785

Everyone is entitled to their observations.

Was a little more than an anecdote for me though, more like 3 days of bloody murder, might have been short but there was certainly nothing amusing about the experience.

The virus was no joke, especially so when the hospitals were all full and refusing to admit any more patients down to being at capacity, which was a fact at the time.

This illustrates my point quite clearly, thank you.

When someone who doesn't carry water for the establishment tells a personal story, it's just an anecdote. But your personal stories are "more than an anecdote."

The fact that your brain simply can't process the irony is--I don't know if it's more scary or humorous.

a reply to: face23785

Correction "more than an anecdote FOR ME"

Still an anecdote all the same if that is how you choose to recognize my account of the matter.

May i ask which part do you find amusing or regarded as unreliable?

And the fact that you choose to disregard, twist, or downright ignore the important part of a sentence aka the words "for me" speaks volumes.

a reply to: thethinkingman

Says Mr Qanaoacrap with a fascination towards Chimpanzee Adenoviruses if somewhat of a lack of understanding as to what they actually do and who thinks the AstraZeneca vaccine constitutes gene therapy. LoL

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: thethinkingman

Again "the mRNA from the vaccines does not enter the cell nucleus or interact with the DNA at all, so it does not constitute gene therapy.".

But please feel free to continue to prattle on.

Actually the current argument is that it's "inconclusive" which is a way for them to kick the can down the road until its proven like everything else.

youtu.be...

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Inconclusive eh?

You mean like the Abominable Snowman or God?

Thats handy.

Get back to us all when you have conclusive proof of the tangible sort that is not you attempting to punt doom porn.

At least you are par for the course. LoL

"The email identified “a significant difference in % RNA integrity/truncated species” between the clinical batches and proposed commercial batches—from around 78% to 55%. The root cause was unknown and the impact of this loss of RNA integrity on safety and efficacy of the vaccine was “yet to be defined,” the email said.

Ultimately, on 21 December, EMA authorised Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine. The agency’s public assessment report, a technical document published on its website, noted, “the quality of this medicinal product, submitted in the emergency context of the current (covid-19) pandemic, is considered to be sufficiently consistent and acceptable.”2

It’s unclear how the agency’s concerns were satisfied.

According to one of the leaked emails dated 25 November, positive news had come from an undisclosed source in the US: “The latest lots indicate that % intact RNA are back at around 70-75%, which leaves us cautiously optimistic that additional data could address the issue,” the email said.

RNA instability is one of the biggest hurdles for researchers developing nucleic acid based vaccines. It is the primary reason for the technology’s stringent cold chain requirements and has been addressed by encapsulating the mRNA in lipid nanoparticles (box).

“The complete, intact mRNA molecule is essential to its potency as a vaccine,” professor of biopharmaceutics Daan J.A. Crommelin and colleagues wrote in a review article in The Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences late last year.

“Even a minor degradation reaction, anywhere along a mRNA strand, can severely slow or stop proper translation performance of that strand and thus result in the incomplete expression of the target antigen.”

british medical journal

omg guyz.....randomly degraded mrna messages whoooo, what could possibly go wrong???? well nobody has checked. so i guess that means nothing right guyzzzz, thats science right guyzzzz????? Yeah maybe if you're a brain dead bone head.

i sure hope they can keep those batches at MINUS 70 DEGREES CENTIGRADE in wallgreens .........

The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among unvaccinated individuals. These findings were more pronounced in older adults and individuals with pre-existing conditions. According to the European Medicines Agency’s recommendations, frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible

The decrease in immunity is caused by several factors. First, N1-methylpseudouridine is used as a substitute for uracil in the genetic code. The modified protein may induce the activation of regulatory T cells, resulting in decreased cellular immunity.

Thereby, the spike proteins do not immediately decay following the administration of mRNA vaccines. The spike proteins present on exosomes circulate throughout the body for more than 4 months .

In addition, in vivo studies have shown that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) accumulate in the liver, spleen, adrenal glands, and ovaries , and that LNP-encapsulated mRNA is highly inflammatory [7].

Newly generated antibodies of the spike protein damage the cells and tissues that are primed to produce spike proteins [8], and vascular endothelial cells are damaged by spike proteins in the bloodstream ; this may damage the immune system organs such as the adrenal gland.

Additionally, antibody-dependent enhancement may occur, wherein infection-enhancing antibodies attenuate the effect of neutralizing antibodies in preventing infection [10].

The original antigenic sin [11], that is, the residual immune memory of the Wuhan-type vaccine may prevent the vaccine from being sufficiently effective against variant strains. These mechanisms may also be involved in the exacerbation of COVID-19.

whoaaaa omg guyz ....science??????

In conclusion, COVID-19 vaccination is a major risk factor for infections in critically ill patients.

but...but ...but omg guyz ....but they said it was mostly useful for vulnerable people omggg guyz not another wrong thing, nahhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

virology link

a reply to: thethinkingman

Kind of hard to do indeed considering we don't have any Walgreens stores here in the UK, so there is that.

She suffered all of the "common" side effects of the vaccine but hoped these would last approximately 12 to 18 hours, the inquest heard. But two weeks later she was "screaming in pain" with the "worst headache" she had ever experienced.

Despite this, a CT scan was reported as "normal". Three days after her admission, Kasey was administered a dose of platelets and her inquest heard that she began to rapidly deteriorate.

She suffered from fits and was "not responding to seizure control", the inquest heard. She was then incubated and put on a ventilator where doctors performed another CT scan, now revealing the blood clot.

Doctors decided that brain surgery would not be in Kasey's best interest and could result in "significant brain damage". After Kasey's condition did not improve the following day, sedative drugs were withdrawn so doctors could accurately assess her neurological state.

She was found to be "brain stem dead" so mechanical ventilation was withdrawn and she died later that day.

link

Nothing to see here, nope. Completely sayf and effektiv.

a reply to: thethinkingman

Nothing to see here, nope. Completely sayf and effektiv.

I'm not sure what "sayf" or "effektiv" amounts to.

Certainly not English.

A former taekwondo champion who had his leg amputated weeks after receiving the covid vaccination has vowed to battle back.

He was forced to return to England in April last year and was beginning to rebuild his life in his hometown of Stamford when he fell ill. Dave’s flu-like symptoms started within hours of having the AstaZeneca vaccination against Covid-19 on March 4. His symptoms got progressively worse over the following month. His foot started to swell and he was rushed to Addenbrooke’s Hospital for treatment on April 10. His left leg was later amputated below the knee.

linky

omg guys so sayf and effektiv.

A 26-year-old graduate died from a rare complication of the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine after being given out-of-date information about the risk of blood clots, an inquest has heard.

Jack Hurn, who was originally from Devon but was living in Redditch, Worcestershire, died in June last year, less than two weeks after receiving the jab in the West Midlands.

A week-long inquest at Birmingham Coroner’s Court was told a GP informed Mr Hurn the risk of blood clots on the brain for his age group was one in 250,000, when the latest NHS guidance estimated it to be one in 50,000.

The inquest heard the Coventry University automotive design graduate opted to go ahead with his first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine on May 29 2021, after being told the Revival Fires vaccination hub in Dudley had no stock of the Pfizer jab.

Mr Hurn - whose girlfriend Alex Jones also received the AstraZeneca vaccine at the clinic - became unwell eight days after the jab and died in hospital on June 11 despite emergency surgery.

Ms Brown added: "Jack was not given all of the information to make an informed choice. "In particular the risk of complications for his age group was understated." A spokesman for NHS England in the Midlands said: "Our sincere condolences are with Jack Hurn’s family and friends for the tragic loss that they have suffered, and we recognise how difficult it will have been to relive the events this week.

linkyplop

omg so sayf and effektiv they had literally zero chance of dying from covid but oh well.

a reply to: thethinkingman

Here is your salient point you should take from that article.

Medics haven’t confirmed the cause of the infection, but Dave fears it was linked to the vaccine.

Hardly conclusive proof of anything other than a poor man's tragedy really.

As to whatever the feck "sayf and effektiv." means, well jury is still out on that one. LoL

Might wanna put the sauce down methinks.