UK Bans COVID Vax for Kids – Vaccine Harms Sexual Development in Little Boys

originally posted by: BaseHead
Present proof of a case study of young boy’s testicles from England or anywhere else for that matter ? a reply to: v1rtu0s0

It makes you wonder how they came to find this information out, were they running some kind of trial where they pulled in a lot of kids and started checking to see if they were infertile using a proper double-blind methodology, and they realized that the ones who were vaxxed had fertility problems, or did somebody notice that a lot of kids were coming in reporting fertility problems and write a paper on it?

Did the study come first and discover the problem, or was the study commissioned to investigate the problem?

What IS the bar for fertility of a prepubesant child?

a reply to: thethinkingman

So, no coverup, the new media is free to report on vax death?

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: thethinkingman

The fact that this is public knowledge, and that the UK government is freely admitting to it and is paying out compensation, clearly demonstrates that there isn't this huge coverup that the doom porn people claim.

If it's on the BBC, it's not being covered up.

The uk government is NOT freely admitting it. This is....like nearly 2 years after these injections..... the fact many people are already dead without any analysis, the fact injuries from vaccine were and still are being denied, covered up, not examined.... cause they literally cannot disprove it so they HAVE to admit it in these instances.

you know how they keep telling people to take this??? you know like kids? you know they keep saying its safe and these events are rare??? you remember how your memory was primed for years prior to "admission" ...you think this just instantly changes all those peoples memories who have thoughts contrary to this??? Lets just disregard the literal 2 years of mind programming that anyone who dares question the vaccine is just a crackpot, a danger, a this, a that....yeah that has no effect what so ever.

Does this mean EVERY government is "admitting" it???? The fact that you grasp at this instantly instead of looking at the fact....people are dying when they dont NEED TOO, this proves you're not a good person. No it doesnt mean admission at all. If people just went along with the government...none of this would be known.

I dont get your perspective, i dont get why people want to say no, no, no this is all over exaggerated .....yet ...dont wanna say that about the virus, the responses to the virus, the unnesiccary vaccine program essentially FORCED on nearly everyone.....the TRILLIONS which taxpayers are collectively being forced to pay ....with no ability to refuse....

Oh but nothing to worry about guys..... jesus christ. Literally evidence that now.....people do die from this....i bet you've said multiple times in the past and argued nah nah, that doesnt happen, fake!!!! wheres the proof!!!! i bet you did. So now that people die ohhh come on, its just a few people....even though more people died from the vaccines in 2021 in the uk according to the yellow card numbers compared to the amount of people that died in 2020 from covid aged 0 to 49 in the uk.

these are from figures i collected in 2021, and by that time the death count in the uk was 76'000 in 2020 and 73'000 in 2021 and now the numbers have been reduced by 20'000....the deaths from covid are now 66'000 and 63'000 - but people dont go and look the figures up again...they just remember the highly inflated original ones.

The numbers i collected in 2021 state from the ONS data that 1488 people aged 0 to 49 died from covid in 2020 in the uk, the yellow card scheme at the same time said over 1500 people died from the vaccines in 2021 in the uk...... Obviously these numbers are waaaaaaaaaaaay below the actual number of people that died due to the vaccine and there is no way to show this without extensive studies which arent going to be done cause people are already buried and cremated.

So gene therapy is

Definition
Where DNA is inserted artificially into a cell to treat a genetic disease.

Use in clinical context
The principle behind gene therapy is that protein production can be altered. This can be in cells that do not produce a particular protein when they should, or they produce an altered version of the protein that does not function correctly.

Gene therapy delivers a functioning copy of a gene to cells. This is usually done using a non-infectious virus to deliver the gene to the target cells. It does not integrate the new DNA into the chromosomes, but exists as free-floating DNA in the nucleus where it can be transcribed into mRNA. Once transcribed, the mRNA is processed in the same way as mRNA transcribed from chromosomal DNA.

Seems like add a bit of DNA get the New DNA to create mRNA that is processed in the same manner as natural.

So if you skip the first part and just generate the mRNA artificially -
how is the body going to react any differently than if you added a piece of DNA to create the 1st mRNA.

IF both processes are designed to produce mRNA to cause a change within receiving cells what difference does it make who sent the message?

ons deaths by age group in uk

Look at this table and see the TINY proportion of people that have covid on their death certificate, we're talking 0.006% of the uk population died aged 0 to 59 from covid in 2020.

This is enough to give ALL PEOPLE 18 AND ABOVE an untested vaccine that can't even help them anyway cause the virus mutates so much and the antibody response from vaccination is absolutely pathetic????

Up to and including 24 August 2022, the MHRA received and analysed 172,901 UK Yellow Cards from people who have received the COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech. These reports include a total of 498,473 suspected reactions (i.e., a single report may contain more than one symptom).

The first report was received on 9 December 2020. Up to and including 24 August 2022, the MHRA received and analysed a total of 246,183 UK reports of suspected ADRs to the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca.

These reports include a total of 872,333 suspected reactions (a single report may contain more than one symptom). The first report was received on 4 January 2021.

Up to and including 24 August 2022, the MHRA received and analysed a total of 40,576 UK reports of suspected ADRs to the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna.

These include a total 134,340 suspected reactions (a single report may contain more than one symptom). The first report was received on 7 April 2021.

The MHRA has received 820 UK reports of suspected ADRs to the COVID-19 Pfizer/BioNTech Vaccine in which the patient died after vaccination, 1,301 reports for the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, 70 reports for the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna and 49 reports where the brand of vaccine was unspecified.

And remember this majorly under reported and examined because its literally impossible for pfizer or any agency to keep on top of these kinds of numbers. so 2,240 deaths according to this.

li nk

If you next examine the amount of deaths compared to the infection and recoveries .......

so 22,241,308 positive tests against 165'369 deaths in the uk this = 0.7% ..... So this basically proves you can't die and it has NOTHING to do with vaccines in terms of "saving" people, your immune system will work regardless cause thats whats stopping the virus...not the vaccine, its just the vaccine teaches your body to a have unique response compared to being naturally infected.

link

99+% of people can survive covid easily. What possible reason would you give all those people something they dont need? its obvious....MONEY.

a reply to: thethinkingman

I think that maybe you need to switch to decaf.

We know that this isn't being covered up because when people first started to die from the vax it was all over the MSM.

One of the first to die was a BBC journalist named Lisa Shaw. She hit pretty much every nail square on the head for a covid vaccine death. From the particular vaccine used, to the time that it until she died. Absolute classic example, a benchmark. Link

Her journalist colleagues put her death in the headlines and kept it there. They made sure that everybody knew how she died, why, and when.

The largest news organization in the world made 100 percent certain that this was being reported on.

Die to her death, and to 14 others - that were reported by the media - the European Union changed its vaccine strategy. They changed which vaxes were used, when they were given, and who they were given to.

After this we see a significant drop-off in vax deaths in the EU. Not reporting, because the existing deaths were being reported on, but the actual number of deaths.

The numbers all track, the dates track too. They track across every EU country where these changes were made. A change that would be more difficult to fake than it would be to resolve by making the changes that they claim to have made.

After that, most of the deaths have been shock reactions. The level has been roughly consistent to the level that you would expect with the winter flu vax. something that would also be very difficult to fake.

This too has been reported on openly by the BBC.

No coverup is this perfect, so it's got to be the truth.

a reply to: thethinkingman

Most of the people who died have had co-morbidity. They die from heart attacks, or renal failure, sometimes weeks or months after they've gotten over covid. Which is why you can't just brute force the numbers, and why changing the way that you record people's deaths can dramatically effect the number.

Plus, covid isn't just about the deaths, it's about the people who get seriously sick, and need long and expensive care.

It's significantly cheaper and easier to vax thousands of people than it is to ventilate a handful.

This is tax payer's money. It doesn't just drop from the sky in bundles.

None of the current trials are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospitalisations, intensive care use, or deaths

Vaccines are being hailed as the solution to the covid-19 pandemic, but the vaccine trials currently underway are not designed to tell us if they will save lives, reports Peter Doshi, Associate Editor at The BMJ today.

Several covid-19 vaccine trials are now in their most advanced (phase 3) stage, but what will it mean exactly when a vaccine is declared “effective”? Many may assume that successful phase 3 studies will mean we have a proven way of keeping people from getting very sick and dying from covid-19.

And a robust way to interrupt viral transmission. Yet the current phase 3 trials are not actually set up to prove either, says Doshi. “None of the trials currently underway are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospitalisations, intensive care use, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus,” he writes.

He explains that all ongoing phase 3 trials for which details have been released are evaluating mild, not severe, disease - and they will be able to report final results once around 150 participants develop symptoms.

In Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, for example, individuals with only a cough and positive lab test would bring those trials one event closer to their completion.

Yet Doshi argues that vaccine manufacturers have done little to dispel the notion that severe covid-19 was what was being assessed.

“Hospitalisations and deaths from covid-19 are simply too uncommon in the population being studied for an effective vaccine to demonstrate statistically significant differences in a trial of 30,000 people,” he adds. “The same is true regarding whether it can save lives or prevent transmission: the trials are not designed to find out

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL

originally posted by: puzzled2
So gene therapy is

Definition
Where DNA is inserted artificially into a cell to treat a genetic disease.

Use in clinical context
The principle behind gene therapy is that protein production can be altered. This can be in cells that do not produce a particular protein when they should, or they produce an altered version of the protein that does not function correctly.

Gene therapy delivers a functioning copy of a gene to cells. This is usually done using a non-infectious virus to deliver the gene to the target cells. It does not integrate the new DNA into the chromosomes, but exists as free-floating DNA in the nucleus where it can be transcribed into mRNA. Once transcribed, the mRNA is processed in the same way as mRNA transcribed from chromosomal DNA.

Seems like add a bit of DNA get the New DNA to create mRNA that is processed in the same manner as natural.

So if you skip the first part and just generate the mRNA artificially -
how is the body going to react any differently than if you added a piece of DNA to create the 1st mRNA.

IF both processes are designed to produce mRNA to cause a change within receiving cells what difference does it make who sent the message?

The mRNA in the vax acts outside of the nucleolus, so it cannot insert it's DNA into you.

You'd need to significantly change the composition of the vax in order for it to do what you suggest.

a reply to: thethinkingman

From your own source

Moderna’s trial is designed to find out if the vaccine can prevent covid-19 disease, says Zaks. Like Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson, Moderna has designed its study to detect a relative risk reduction of at least 30% in participants developing lab-confirmed covid-19, consistent with FDA and international guidance.

Also from your own source

21/10/2020

Link

It's almost 2 years old. Don't put it up here as if this was current information.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: puzzled2
So gene therapy is

Definition
Where DNA is inserted artificially into a cell to treat a genetic disease.

Use in clinical context
The principle behind gene therapy is that protein production can be altered. This can be in cells that do not produce a particular protein when they should, or they produce an altered version of the protein that does not function correctly.

Gene therapy delivers a functioning copy of a gene to cells. This is usually done using a non-infectious virus to deliver the gene to the target cells. It does not integrate the new DNA into the chromosomes, but exists as free-floating DNA in the nucleus where it can be transcribed into mRNA. Once transcribed, the mRNA is processed in the same way as mRNA transcribed from chromosomal DNA.

Seems like add a bit of DNA get the New DNA to create mRNA that is processed in the same manner as natural.

So if you skip the first part and just generate the mRNA artificially -
how is the body going to react any differently than if you added a piece of DNA to create the 1st mRNA.

IF both processes are designed to produce mRNA to cause a change within receiving cells what difference does it make who sent the message?

The mRNA in the vax acts outside of the nucleolus, so it cannot insert it's DNA into you.

You'd need to significantly change the composition of the vax in order for it to do what you suggest.

but the adeno virus vaccines do exactly that.....they are what is used in "gene therapy".

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: thethinkingman

From your own source

Moderna’s trial is designed to find out if the vaccine can prevent covid-19 disease, says Zaks. Like Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson, Moderna has designed its study to detect a relative risk reduction of at least 30% in participants developing lab-confirmed covid-19, consistent with FDA and international guidance.

Also from your own source

21/10/2020

Link

It's almost 2 years old. Don't put it up here as if this was current information.

im not....its to point out that the trials were not ever designed to show anything useful....because as we can see, the vaccines are absolutely useless.

it also states in clear wording that the prevelence of death from covid isnt large enough to even tell if the vaccine would be effective ....simply due to the fact 99+% of people CANNOT die or even be harmed by corona virus.......just like the flu. But continue to avoid all the details.

A 17-year-old girl in Washington, who contracted COVID-19 and fully recovered from the disease, died late last month after receiving her second dose of the coronavirus vaccine.

The unnamed teen, who was jabbed with Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine on Sept. 3 and Sept. 15, died of cardiac arrest on Oct. 23, ClarkCountyToday.com reported, citing data from the United States government's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

She tested positive for the coronavirus in August, but she was able to fully recover, according to the data. The girl showed up at the emergency department of a hospital on the day of her death after experiencing chest pain and breathing difficulties in the past 48 hours, her records showed.

She was allegedly "completely well" prior to experiencing the symptoms. Hospital staff reportedly performed advanced cardiovascular life support protocol with CPR on the girl for 65 minutes after she suffered cardiac arrest, but she could not be resuscitated and died.

link

In yet another incident, a 77-year-old man died within minutes after receiving the first dose of Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine in Noordwijkerhout. However, the officials are looking into the issue and are yet to confirm the link between death and vaccination.

Speaking to the media, a spokesperson for the regional health service GGD Hollands-Midden, said that the injection itself was without incident, and the man waited under supervision for fifteen minutes after the injection before leaving the facility. It has been made mandatory for all the health centres to maintain the observatory period for all the people who are taking the vaccine.

According to the spokesperson, the deceased collapsed outside the health centre. "He collapsed outside. We resuscitated him before the emergency services arrived. We just heard that he died in hospital," the spokesperson was quoted as saying.

LINK

Vikki Spit reacts to the Covid vaccine injury debate in Parliament

really appears its been admitted so openly. yuuuuuuuup, sure.

www.youtube.com...

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
It has been odd that they have been pushing the experimental Covid vaccines so hard on the young age groups that are statistically not affected by Covid. Why take the risk when the risk benefit ratio is skewed in the wrong direction? If I was someone who wanted depopulation this is "accidentally" exactly what I would want to happen--the destruction of the reproductive systems of children so they could not have offspring. The lipid nano particles have been shown to penetrate the testes and cause reproductive harm. The lipid nano particles can pretty much go anywhere in the body and cause inflammation and thus immune system activation leading to a plethora of adverse effects. I'm actually surprised the government acknowledged it since they aren't acknowledging anything else.

Dr. Wolf discussed the latest development from the United Kingdom. The UK Health Security Agency banned the COVID vaccine from childrenwho had not turned five by the end of last month. The UK will no longer offer the vaccine to children aged 5 to 11.

Dr. Wolf: The vaccines hurt the testes and hurt the parts of the testes that develop the masculinity and secondary sex characteristics of little boys, and baby boys, and teenage boys. So they literally harm the chances of your little boy child to grow up normally as a male human adult.

The Daily Clout previously reported on the vaccines causing an astonishing drop in adult male fertility.

The massive drop in fertility was also reported in this ATS thread.

SOURCE - www.thegatewaypundit.com...

My thoughts of your mind are off topic & a violation of ATS protocol

a reply to: AaarghZombies

cheaper are you kidding -- $50 billion in profit to the manufacture of the jab - plus costs of the supply chain - plus cost of the jabbers and side effects and don't forget the tracking administration bills.

Seems if it's costs saving you thinking is the reason to vaccinate then you're barking at the wrong tree - letting it rip thru and kill off the old weak and sick would have been the best thing to happen to save a fortune.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Change what in the mRNA?

In the natural process what does the Gene create mRNA for?
Does it interact with another parts of the gene or dna of genes, does it just wander around doing nothing?

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: AaarghZombies

How exactly do you gauge fertility rates in prepubescent children?

You don’t, because this whole story is fake & anything else I have to say is off topic & in violation of ATS protocol.