UK Bans COVID Vax for Kids – Vaccine Harms Sexual Development in Little Boys

It has been odd that they have been pushing the experimental Covid vaccines so hard on the young age groups that are statistically not affected by Covid. Why take the risk when the risk benefit ratio is skewed in the wrong direction? If I was someone who wanted depopulation this is "accidentally" exactly what I would want to happen--the destruction of the reproductive systems of children so they could not have offspring. The lipid nano particles have been shown to penetrate the testes and cause reproductive harm. The lipid nano particles can pretty much go anywhere in the body and cause inflammation and thus immune system activation leading to a plethora of adverse effects. I'm actually surprised the government acknowledged it since they aren't acknowledging anything else.

Dr. Wolf discussed the latest development from the United Kingdom. The UK Health Security Agency banned the COVID vaccine from childrenwho had not turned five by the end of last month. The UK will no longer offer the vaccine to children aged 5 to 11.

Dr. Wolf: The vaccines hurt the testes and hurt the parts of the testes that develop the masculinity and secondary sex characteristics of little boys, and baby boys, and teenage boys. So they literally harm the chances of your little boy child to grow up normally as a male human adult.

The Daily Clout previously reported on the vaccines causing an astonishing drop in adult male fertility.

The massive drop in fertility was also reported in this ATS thread.

SOURCE - www.thegatewaypundit.com...

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Great, except they have done no such thing. What actually happened was that they have simply ended a short term vax campaign for school age children, which was only really put in place because of demands from parents and teachers.

Link

As you said yourself covid doesn't really affect young kids, so this program wasn't seen as being particularly useful.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

You might be interested to hear, but fertility rates can fluxuate dramatically over time

I can't upload the images right now as the page is down, but if you visit this page (link) you'll see that fertility in the UK is actually up on it's pre-pandemic levels.

Chart and table of the U.K. fertility rate from 1950 to 2022. United Nations projections are also included through the year 2100.
The current fertility rate for U.K. in 2022 is 1.753 births per woman, a 0.06% increase from 2021.
The fertility rate for U.K. in 2021 was 1.752 births per woman, a 0% increase from 2020.
The fertility rate for U.K. in 2020 was 1.752 births per woman, a 0.06% increase from 2019.
The fertility rate for U.K. in 2019 was 1.751 births per woman, a 0.06% increase from 2018.

Link

So, it's actually been rising slightly for the last 4 years, rather than falling. The fact that they've see the same year on year rise in 2018 and 2019 (Pre vax) as in 2021 and 2022 (Post vax) would suggest that the vax has had absolutely no effect on UK fertility rates at all.

In the UK, the main cause of fertility lose is actually obesity.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

How exactly do you gauge fertility rates in prepubescent children?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

t has been odd that they have been pushing the experimental Covid vaccines so hard on the young age groups that are statistically not affected by Covid.

Demand from parents and teachers, and a desire to stop children from transmitting it to older family members. Doesn't seem odd to me. Not a big fan of vaxxing kids like this, but still not odd.

Why take the risk when the risk benefit ratio is skewed in the wrong direction?

What exactly is that ratio, I notice that you haven't included it.

I was someone who wanted depopulation

The repeal of Roe V Wade suggests that depopulation isn't a goal. I wanted to depopulate the world, abortion on demand seems like good way of going about it, people will be lining up to kill their own children, so you don't have to.

The lipid nano particles have been shown to penetrate the testes and cause reproductive harm.

I'd like a scientific source on that, and remember, some of us deal with this kind of thing regularly, so don't be afraid to spare the technical details. In fact, I insist that you include them.

Now, I have noticed that your sources seem to be, to put it charitably, a little lacking in credibility.

This latest one, Dr Wolf, extremely so:


www.thecut.com...

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Great, except they have done no such thing. What actually happened was that they have simply ended a short term vax campaign for school age children, which was only really put in place because of demands from parents and teachers.

Link

As you said yourself covid doesn't really affect young kids, so this program wasn't seen as being particularly useful.

Wait, are you saying health authorities make decisions based on parents and teachers feelings and not science?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

People who put their faith in governments because they have never known them to lie about anything will never accept your sources. They'll wait until a government source or their MSM channel tells them there is a problem, and it was known before the first dose was ever injected.

Or, the vaccine is the greatest thing since sliced bread and the growing numbers of ill and deceased people are faking it.

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: AaarghZombies

How exactly do you gauge fertility rates in prepubescent children?

I shudder to think. Maybe you get this old white van, and a box of puppies ....

I mentioned this in the earlier thread. The group that's suffering the fertility drop isn't children, and it pre-dates the vax by several decades. The OP is simply stringing two completely unrelated doom porn stories together.

a reply to: nugget1

Yet you put your faith in crackpots and proven liars?

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Great, except they have done no such thing. What actually happened was that they have simply ended a short term vax campaign for school age children, which was only really put in place because of demands from parents and teachers.

Link

As you said yourself covid doesn't really affect young kids, so this program wasn't seen as being particularly useful.

Wait, are you saying health authorities make decisions based on parents and teachers feelings and not science?

You've been saying more or less the same thing for the last two years, so I think that I've got you over a barrel on this one.

About 80 percent of the UK's covid policy is based on public demand, not science. A fact that I've been using to debunk most of your NWO based conspiracies for the last couple of years. So I've also got you over a barrel on this one too.

You can't say that I'm wrong without admitting that I was right all of those other times.

originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

People who put their faith in governments because they have never known them to lie about anything will never accept your sources. They'll wait until a government source or their MSM channel tells them there is a problem, and it was known before the first dose was ever injected.

Or, the vaccine is the greatest thing since sliced bread and the growing numbers of ill and deceased people are faking it.

The science stands on its own, with or without the government or the media behind it.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
Now, I have noticed that your sources seem to be, to put it charitably, a little lacking in credibility.

This latest one, Dr Wolf, extremely so:


www.thecut.com...

Oh, oh, oh, it's HER.

I remember that one, she definitely has no credibility as a researcher.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Do you have a source to back up these claims that is not from a well know anti-vax far-right fake news website?

Because this sounds like the gooberment not wasting resources to me given that the majority of young children are not susceptible to COVID 19 in any sort of numbers.

a reply to: nugget1

Now, I don't agree with Twitter banning her as only morons would be influenced by her barmy claims, but she did once claim that the vaccines were software platforms capable of receiving uploads or some such utter nonsense?


Here:


www.bbc.com...

a reply to: AaarghZombies

About 80 percent of the UK's covid policy is based on public demand, not science.

These are some nice words. Got a link that proves it?

I’m sure that those same people (actually closer to 100%) would also like to not have to pay any income taxes anymore. What does the government think about that?

You don’t have anyone over a barrel dude.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Great, except they have done no such thing. What actually happened was that they have simply ended a short term vax campaign for school age children, which was only really put in place because of demands from parents and teachers.

Link

As you said yourself covid doesn't really affect young kids, so this program wasn't seen as being particularly useful.

Wait, are you saying health authorities make decisions based on parents and teachers feelings and not science?

You've been saying more or less the same thing for the last two years, so I think that I've got you over a barrel on this one.

About 80 percent of the UK's covid policy is based on public demand, not science. A fact that I've been using to debunk most of your NWO based conspiracies for the last couple of years. So I've also got you over a barrel on this one too.

You can't say that I'm wrong without admitting that I was right all of those other times.

Not really, public opinion is created by the mocking bird mainstream media.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
Now, I have noticed that your sources seem to be, to put it charitably, a little lacking in credibility.

This latest one, Dr Wolf, extremely so:


www.thecut.com...

Oh, oh, oh, it's HER.

I remember that one, she definitely has no credibility as a researcher.

And you do?


After this whole vaccination disaster you've been wrong every single time.

a reply to: KKLOCO

We'd like to pay no income tax?

Great.

We'd have no NHS, no benefits, no schools, fire service, Police, etc?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Judge a man by the company he keeps.

In your case, well.......

Are you seriously trying to tell me this latest source of yours has any credibility?