UK Bans COVID Vax for Kids – Vaccine Harms Sexual Development in Little Boys

originally posted by: andy06shake
Everyone is entitled to their observations.

Was a little more than an anecdote for me though, more like 3 days of bloody murder, might have been short but there was certainly nothing amusing about the experience.

Well, I laughed the whole way through 2020.

Laughter is a good medicine for the body, better than some so-called vaccines I'll warrant.

And no, the hospitals were not 'all full' or anywhere close to full capacity. Remember that pop-up hospital they built but didn't use at all? Why not use it?
Why? Why?? Why???

Did y'all know the j & j "vaccine" contains no less than 8 billion 920 million genetically modified human adeno virus type 26?

A gene from the corona virus has been inserted into the DNA of this adeno virus.

originally posted by: baggy7981

originally posted by: andy06shake
Everyone is entitled to their observations.

Was a little more than an anecdote for me though, more like 3 days of bloody murder, might have been short but there was certainly nothing amusing about the experience.

Well, I laughed the whole way through 2020.

Laughter is a good medicine for the body, better than some so-called vaccines I'll warrant.

And no, the hospitals were not 'all full' or anywhere close to full capacity. Remember that pop-up hospital they built but didn't use at all? Why not use it?
Why? Why?? Why???

Here in the U.S., outright lies were broadcast on major network TV (local news broadcast) that claimed "off label" use of Ivermectin was "causing a massive spike in emergency rooms in Oklahoma, and filling up hospitals"

Complete fabrication.

The fake news story was picked up by a number of different national "news" carriers including Rolling Stone magazine. Last I knew, only Rolling Stone had issued a retraction of the false story.

I spoke with nurses and doctors here in Connecticut, and there were peaks and valleys of time where ICUs were getting close to full, but that greatly varied by facility type, location and timing. It was, in some places, very much an exaggerated and borderline falsehood (that 'hospitals were filling up zOMG!'). The information needed better chaproning of who/what said it, and how precise it was, down to which hospitals and how much capacity they really had. As we see in the fake news story above ^^^^ "hospital capacity" could be weaponized as fear propaganda, either in favor of certain treatments/practices, or against them.

Many MANY elective procedures, cancer scans, preventive maintenance type procedures were put off over the past few years, part ways due to fear-mongering the public into staying away from medical clinics, part ways from bending the truth about how busy hospitals and clinics were with COVID patients. I had to go for diagnostic imaging during 2020/21 that involved MRIs, at a non-hospital clinic. At that time I asked if their facility or other imaging locations had felt any kind of back pressure from COVID (taking scans/pictures of lungs), and they said no, and that was evident once I got past the fear factor and said, 'I have to get this scan done, no matter what the talking heads say about capacity issues or risk'. Other folks put these elective procedures off, and they are now on the list of casualties of the pandemic, not from COVID directly, but from COVID-related mismanagement of medical resources.

This story is also one of the first things I point out when "alternative news sources" (i.e. bitchute) are pilloried and scorned. The staff at that broadcast station, the anchors, the editors, the producers, ran a bogus news story, with a reach of 10s of thousands of viewers, and nobody bothered to fact check the "news" team, until after the community called in to say "WTF are you on about?? The hospital is NOT full"

I think the site motto is "Deny Ignorance" and doesn't imply "Deny Ignorance by bitchute, but Tolerate Ignorance by MSM"

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Aren't there elitists who want to keep little boys from reaching puberty? The Covid-19 vaccine could have been tweaked to fill that objective.

originally posted by: SleeperHasAwakened

originally posted by: baggy7981

originally posted by: andy06shake
Everyone is entitled to their observations.

Was a little more than an anecdote for me though, more like 3 days of bloody murder, might have been short but there was certainly nothing amusing about the experience.

Well, I laughed the whole way through 2020.

Laughter is a good medicine for the body, better than some so-called vaccines I'll warrant.

And no, the hospitals were not 'all full' or anywhere close to full capacity. Remember that pop-up hospital they built but didn't use at all? Why not use it?
Why? Why?? Why???

Here in the U.S., outright lies were broadcast on major network TV (local news broadcast) that claimed "off label" use of Ivermectin was "causing a massive spike in emergency rooms in Oklahoma, and filling up hospitals"

Complete fabrication.

The fake news story was picked up by a number of different national "news" carriers including Rolling Stone magazine. Last I knew, only Rolling Stone had issued a retraction of the false story.

I spoke with nurses and doctors here in Connecticut, and there were peaks and valleys of time where ICUs were getting close to full, but that greatly varied by facility type, location and timing. It was, in some places, very much an exaggerated and borderline falsehood (that 'hospitals were filling up zOMG!'). The information needed better chaproning of who/what said it, and how precise it was, down to which hospitals and how much capacity they really had. As we see in the fake news story above ^^^^ "hospital capacity" could be weaponized as fear propaganda, either in favor of certain treatments/practices, or against them.

Many MANY elective procedures, cancer scans, preventive maintenance type procedures were put off over the past few years, part ways due to fear-mongering the public into staying away from medical clinics, part ways from bending the truth about how busy hospitals and clinics were with COVID patients. I had to go for diagnostic imaging during 2020/21 that involved MRIs, at a non-hospital clinic. At that time I asked if their facility or other imaging locations had felt any kind of back pressure from COVID (taking scans/pictures of lungs), and they said no, and that was evident once I got past the fear factor and said, 'I have to get this scan done, no matter what the talking heads say about capacity issues or risk'. Other folks put these elective procedures off, and they are now on the list of casualties of the pandemic, not from COVID directly, but from COVID-related mismanagement of medical resources.

This story is also one of the first things I point out when "alternative news sources" (i.e. bitchute) are pilloried and scorned. The staff at that broadcast station, the anchors, the editors, the producers, ran a bogus news story, with a reach of 10s of thousands of viewers, and nobody bothered to fact check the "news" team, until after the community called in to say "WTF are you on about?? The hospital is NOT full"

I think the site motto is "Deny Ignorance" and doesn't imply "Deny Ignorance by bitchute, but Tolerate Ignorance by MSM"

Exactly, they ignore all the bs the MSM spouts off which is 99% of what they say period.

a reply to: baggy7981

Me and the Mrs contracted COVID 19 on about the 6th/9th of January, about 2 months before the vaccine became an avalible thing here in the UK.

Think it was just before the pop-up hospitals started to materialize, or they were not open yet, which would have been the SEC temporary hospital i think.

It's Scotland and the weather did not help matters nether, we waited near enough 10 hours on an ambulance, and even when it came they were not admitting any more people to the hospital with COVID.

Was not very nice trust me.

As to the laughter, well it is good for the soul, but i cant say i found 2020 or 2021 to be a very funny ha'ha sort of years.

a reply to: nickyw

But Nickyw your a professional news reporter and must provide the information. They can't ridicule and deny the message based on the Source if you don't supply it.

Example of their expectation is Anger at plans to roll back Covid vaccines to under-11s in England

Children aged 5-11 will no longer be offered Covid jabs, except those in clinical risk groups, UKHSA confirms

This article contains all the links to original sources but will probably be hammered as it's the Guardian.
Which happened to be a link in the OP original source that was not acceptable.

do y'all know 0.02% of the world population died from covid in 2020? do you know in 2019.... around the same amount of people died from antibiotic resistance related issues....

did you know 80% of the 0.02% of the world population that died were over .....wait....75...which is basically the average of death from ANY cause.

Do you understand that it is basically impossible for most people to DIE from the corona virus under any normal circumstances???? Do you understand that if you have been infected 1 time, your body has now learned what to do with the virus....FOREVER?

do you understand that paying collectively trillions for everything involved with this is going to be used to take anything the "debtors" are owed???? Do you understand squabbling back and forth like morons isnt going to do anything about this actual reality. You do realise that BILLIONS of people are THAT stupid????

Right?

originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Great, except they have done no such thing. What actually happened was that they have simply ended a short term vax campaign for school age children, which was only really put in place because of demands from parents and teachers.

Link

As you said yourself covid doesn't really affect young kids, so this program wasn't seen as being particularly useful.

8 mice and 8 mice alone.

I literally have no idea what that means.

Yes you do you are intentionally avoiding those vac threads.

As I've made clear on many occasions, I'm not American. Whatever that phrase means I've never heard it.

If you were coming from a place of honesty you'd link to "those" threads.

I know phizer isn’t an American company..

Just wanted to show again his dishonesty.

a reply to: thethinkingman

Again mate the burden of proof is yours to provide.

If you cannot provide such it destroys your credibility and makes it hard for people to take you seriously.

I'm telling you this because if you make claims in other threads and fail to provide links and sources to back up your thoughts and opinions, other people will simply tell you the exact same thing.

If in doubt go read the TnC or ask a mod.

Do you know how to embed links and video?

If that's an obstacle i think there are threads here that can also help.

a reply to: andy06shake

Do people take you seriously?

a reply to: thethinkingman

When I'm trying to help them out i should hope so.

Im thinking you don't know how to present or embed links and video and that's why you are on the defensive foot.

People are not here to do your homework for you.

You are responsible for your own posts and to provide evidence to back them up where applicable.

Again if in doubt ask a mod they will steer your right, but carpy is not asking for anything that you should not have already provided aka evidence to support your claim.

a reply to: andy06shake

you take yourself way too seriously.

ive already done the homework....its YOU who's asking for the home work....REMEMBER? hahah. Its YOU who needs to do some home work buddy.

a reply to: thethinkingman

you take yourself way too seriously.

Only on a Monday morning.

And if you have done the homework you should be able to present such or links to the information.

Unless of course, the dog ate it?

Anyhoo you seem to know best so please continue to make claims without any sort of tangible evidence to back them up after all that's how the rules work in the Diseases and Pandemics forum.

a reply to: thethinkingman

It's not being unfriendly to ask for facts and figures to support your claim.

Could be considered rather prudent all the same, so there is that.

It's obvious you either don't have evidence to support your claim or are unable, or dont know how, to do so.

Anyhoo we could do this dance all night better that you simply learn the lay of the land, somehow i imagine that may be wishful thinking on my part.

a reply to: andy06shake

I'll hold you to your words. You dont seem the type who is fond of admitting they're wrong, so this is going to great.

a reply to: thethinkingman

If you could simply provide a link that might be nice.

Which words is it you wish to hold me to all the same, coz ive not told you anything that not true thus far as you would be perfectly aware if you had bothered to read the TnC.

I'm wrong plenty of times thethinkingman, and when proved wrong there is not much point in not being able to learn from the experience.

Anyhoo my dinners on the plate, have fun, im sure you will do better in the next thread you decide to participate.

a reply to: andy06shake

"What COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca contains

One dose (0.5 ml) contains: COVID-19 Vaccine (ChAdOx1-S* recombinant) 5 × 10^10 viral particles (vp)

*Recombinant, replication-deficient chimpanzee adenovirus vector encoding the SARS-CoV-2 Spike glycoprotein. Produced in genetically modified human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells.

This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs)."

link

What does that say?????

"Although, the modern viral vectors that are used in CoViD vaccines are silenced (replication-deficient), each dose of the vaccine contains a very high viral load (e.g., 50 billion viral particles per dose in Ox/AZ or J&J/Janssen CoViD-19 vaccines whereas 100 billion viral particles per dose in the Sputnik-V). The viral particles are unlikely to be confined to the muscles at the injection site; they are free to distribute across the body and drain through the lymphatic system; their apparent volume of distribution is likely to be very high. The biodistribution of ChaAdOx1 containing HBV in BALB/c mice (study 0841MV38.001) indicated the highest viral levels at the injection site, but low levels of virus were still detected after 24 hours of injection in all other tissues (including blood, brain, heart, inguinal lymph node, kidney, liver, lung, gonads, and spleen). "

"However, in the absence of the results of study 514559, the biodistribution of ChaAdOx1 HBV in mice (study 0841MV38.001) confirms the delivery of vaccine into the brain tissues. The vaccine may therefore spur the brain cells to produce CoViD spike proteins that may lead to an immune response against brain cells, or it may spark a spike protein-induced thrombosis."

www.bmj.com...

What does that say?????

"What COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen contains

The active substance is Adenovirus type 26 encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein**(Ad26.COV2-S) not less than 8.92 log10 infectious units (Inf.U) in each 0.5 mL dose.

**Produced in the PER.C6 TetR Cell Line and by recombinant DNA technology.

This product contains genetically modified organisms (GMOs)."

www.gov.uk...

What does that say?????


"Gam-COVID-Vac is a viral vector vaccine based on two recombinant replication-defective human adenoviruses: Ad26 (serotype 26) and Ad5 (serotype 5) replicated in HEK 293 cells. The viruses contain the gene that encodes the full-length spike protein (S) of SARS-CoV-2 to stimulate an immune response.[6][19][41] Adenoviral vectors[42][43] for expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein have also been used in two other COVID-19 vaccines. One is called Janssen COVID-19 vaccine, it utilizes the Ad26COV2 viral vector based on the human virus Ad26. For this vaccine, the cell line PER.C6[44][45] is used to replicate the vector. Another one called Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID‑19 vaccine, it uses chimpanzee adenovirus (ChAdOx1) as the vector. For both the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19[45] and Gam-COVID-Vac vaccines the producer cells for the production of non-replicating adenoviral vectors were obtained from the HEK 293 cell line.[46] Each dose of Gam-COVID-Vac contains (1.0 ± 0.5) × 1011 virus particles.[34]

Both Ad26 and Ad5 were modified to remove the E1 gene to prevent replication outside the HEK 293 cells.[47] For the production of the vaccine, to propagate adenoviral vectors in which the E1 gene was deleted, HEK 293 cells are used, which express several adenoviral genes, including E1.[48][49] However, although rare, homologous recombination between the inserted cellular sequence and the vector sequence can restore the replication capacity to the vector,[50] with less than 100 replicating adenovirus particles per dose of the vaccine.[47] "

en.wikipedia.org...

What does that say????????


"“Unfortunately,” Roth continues, “these cells had a serious flaw.” HEK293 cells express the adenoviral gene E1, which enables adenoviruses missing this gene to grow. But when Graham initially transformed the cells, molecular biology techniques were not particularly advanced. “The fragment of viral DNA in 293 cells comprises sequences from the extreme end of the genome and extends across E1 and beyond.” The cells therefore contained adenoviral DNA sequences flanking the viral genes that are typically deleted in adenoviral vectors. “This overlap allows homologous recombination to occur.”

Thus in some cases, the replication incompetent adenoviral vector could kick out the therapeutic gene it carried and re-incorporate the E1 gene from the HEK293 cells, resulting in a wildtype virus. This presented a huge safety concern for gene therapies. Not only might a patient receive the therapeutic gene they need but also potentially an adenoviral infection they don't. Alternative viral vectors, notably adeno-associated virus (AAV) and lentiviral vectors, offer a significant improvement as they don't have the same problem with homologous recombination."

www.liebertpub.com...

Enough information yet?????

"Adenoviruses (Ads) are non-enveloped, icosahedral, double-stranded DNA viruses that can broadly infect vertebrates including humans and non-human primates. 1 Adenovirus was first discovered in 1953.2 Most efforts have previously focused on human Ad serotype 5 (AdHu5)-based vectors, which have been extensively studied in laboratories and clinical trials over the past decades.3 It was demonstrated that the AdHu5 vector can elicit potent antigen-specific immune responses in both preclinical and clinical studies.3-5 Although the AdHu5 vector was shown to be very efficient, AdHu5 infection is endemic in humans. In America, 40–60% of humans carry detectable neutralizing antibodies (NAs) against AdHu5 wild-type virus.6 The high prevalence of AdHu5 NAs within the human population reduces the efficiency of gene transfer by the vector and impairs the vaccine potency.7 Among the population of healthy adults in China, seroprevalence rates of AdHu5 are as high as 74.2%8 and this percentage is even higher in Africa and other Asian countries.9 NAs against AdHu5 strongly impair the B- and T-cell responses to the transgene product of the vaccine candidates.6"

"Among them, Ads derived from chimpanzees were advanced to clinical trials owing to their many advantageous features. First, chimpanzee adenoviruses (AdCs) can be cultured in human cell lines such as human embryonic kidney 293 cells (HEK293), which are commonly used for the production of clinical material.10 In addition, AdCs have a low seroprevalence in the human population as they rarely circulate in humans. The amino acid sequences of their hexon hypervariable regions, which contain the majority of the neutralization determinants, are distinguished from common human serotypes of Ad (AdHus).11 AdCs can avoid significant cross-neutralization in sera directed against AdHus. NAs against AdCs are rare in sera among human populations in Europe and the United States, with prevalence rates from 0 to 4%. In contrast, the prevalence is up to 20% in human sera from developing countries, like sub-Saharan Africa.12"

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

"Human embryonic kidney 293 cells, also often referred to as HEK 293, HEK-293, 293 cells, or less precisely as HEK cells, are a specific immortalised cell line derived from a spontaneously miscarried or aborted fetus or human embryonic kidney cells grown in tissue culture taken from a female fetus in 1973.[1][2] "

These are the cells the genetically modified viruses are produced in, they are clones of cells taken from a dead baby in 1973, they are cancer cells.

"Jesse Gelsinger (June 18, 1981 – September 17, 1999) was the first person publicly identified as having died in a clinical trial for gene therapy. Gelsinger suffered from ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency, an X-linked genetic disease of the liver, the symptoms of which include an inability to metabolize ammonia – a byproduct of protein breakdown. The disease is usually fatal at birth, but Gelsinger had a milder form of the disease, in which the ornithine transcarbamylase gene is mutated in only part of the patient's cells, a condition known as somatic mosaicism. As his deficiency was partial, Gelsinger managed to survive on a restricted diet and special medications.

Gelsinger joined a clinical trial run by the University of Pennsylvania that aimed at developing a treatment for infants born with the severe form of the disease. On September 13, 1999, Gelsinger was injected with an adenoviral vector carrying a corrected gene to test the safety of the procedure. He died four days later at the age of 18, on September 17, apparently having suffered a massive immune response triggered by the use of the viral vector to transport the gene into his cells, leading to multiple organ failure and brain death.[1] "

en.wikipedia.org...

it was known that these adeno viruses cause harm in 1999.

"Gene Test Deaths Not Reported Promptly
NIH Was Unaware Of 'Adverse Events'"

"A Harvard-affiliated hospital in Boston quietly suspended a gene therapy experiment last summer after three of the first six patients died and a seventh fell seriously ill, previously unreleased research records show.

Richard Junghans, the Harvard Medical School researcher who led the study, blames the problems on a series of tragic coincidences that were mostly not related to the treatment. But the federal committee that oversees gene therapy had no chance to question that conclusion--or share it with other scientists working on similar experiments--because Junghans did not report the deaths or illness to the National Institutes of Health when they occurred, as required by federal regulations.

Junghans isn't alone in his lapses. His were among hundreds of tardily submitted "adverse event" reports that the NIH recently received in response to news articles and stern agency directives last fall reminding gene researchers of their legal obligation.

Reports of 691 serious adverse events in gene therapy experiments swamped the NIH as a result of the agency's reminders, which officials hope will shed light on the mysterious September death of 18-year-old Jesse Gelsinger in a University of Pennsylvania trial. The Washington Post obtained the reports through a Freedom of Information Act request.

Federal rules demand that such reports be filed "immediately" as problems arise. But 652 of the 691 had never before been seen by the NIH, according to an agency summary requested by Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.). That means less than 6 percent were filed on time.

Moreover, those records indicated that at least some of the previously unreported deaths remained unexplained. That raises the specter that Gelsinger was not the first person to be killed by gene therapy, as researchers have presumed, but the first to be reported as such to the NIH.

Gene therapy is a field of experimental medicine that aims to cure diseases by changing people's genetic makeup, but has yet to provide a cure after 10 years of studies on thousands of patients."

" The surprising discovery that so many medical problems in gene therapy experiments had not been reported to the NIH, and the disturbing questions raised by many of the reports, come at a crucial time for the controversial field.

Just 10 days ago, the Food and Drug Administration shut down the University of Pennsylvania's prestigious gene therapy program after an agency investigation uncovered multiple lapses, some of which may have contributed to Gelsinger's death.

Sen. Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) has scheduled a hearing Wednesday to consider whether federal oversight of gene therapy is adequate. Among those due to testify are Gelsinger's father, who believes that federal regulators did not do enough to protect his son, and a representative of the Biotechnology Industry Organization, which is seeking regulatory changes that could decrease public reporting of certain adverse events that the organization considers proprietary.

Whatever Congress and federal regulators decide, the new findings of chronic noncompliance with existing rules offer compelling evidence that the current system is broken.

Because of public uneasiness about the long-term consequences of genetic engineering, gene therapy has always been subject to extra regulatory oversight. Most notably, all deaths and serious illnesses suffered by volunteers enrolled in gene experiments must be reported not only to the FDA but also to the NIH, even if the sponsor thinks they were not caused by the treatment.

Unlike the FDA, which keeps the reports secret, the NIH presents them at open meetings and makes them available to other scientists and the public.

Evidence began to emerge last year that some researchers were not following those rules. But the full extent of the problem remained unknown until last month, when NIH officials tallied the results of their nationwide appeal to researchers conducting gene therapy experiments similar to the one that killed Gelsinger."

www.washingtonpost.com...

"An award-winning radio presenter died following blood clots after she received the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID vaccine, her family has said.

Lisa Shaw, 44, began suffering from "severe" headaches a week after having the jab, which has been linked to clotting, and fell seriously ill a few days later, according to relatives.

The BBC Radio Newcastle presenter and mother-of-one, died at the city's Royal Victoria Infirmary on Friday afternoon having been treated in intensive care for blood clots and bleeding in her head."

news.sky.com...

Sound familiar??????

"An 18-year-old student died from a blood cot only two weeks after having her Covid vaccination.

Kasey Turner was admitted to hospital after she was experiencing 'thunder clap' headaches. An inquest heard the headaches were the result of thrombosis in her sinus cavity.

She was admitted to Barnsley Hospital's A&E department on the morning of September 23, 2021 with the "worst headache" she had ever experienced. Because of her low platelet count in her blood, doctors initially ruled out a brain haemorrhage.

It was later discovered that the paramedic student was actually suffering from a cerebral venous thrombosis - a blood clot in the sinus cavity. It is believed the blood clot was brought on by the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine, and her inquest found doctors at Barnsley Hospital had "missed opportunities"