It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
Luckily, it was a dud.
But it looks like Russia has escalated to firing missiles at nuclear reactors well outside the current battlefield.
One of Russia's top military commanders has threatened to blow up the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in Enerhodar, Ukraine after heavy shelling over the weekend sparked fears of a potential radioactive catastrophe. The facility was captured by Russian forces on March 3rd, nine days after President Vladimir Putin launched his unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.
According to a Telegram post by Energoatam, a Ukrainian state nuclear agency, Major General Valery Vasiliev of Russia's Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Protection Troops told his battalions that "there will be either Russian land or a scorched desert" in the region encompassing Europe's largest atomic energy station.
Energoatam wrote that Vasiliev had added that "as you know, we mined all the important objects of the Zaporozhye nuclear plant. And we do not hide this from the enemy. We warned them. The enemy knows that the station will be either Russian or nobody's. We are ready for the consequences of this step. And you, the liberating warriors, must understand that we do not have a second way. And if there is the most severe order - we must fulfill it with honor!"
As a reminder
As such take everything as a possibility and NOT as absolute truth.
The very first casualty in a war is the truth and all warfare is based on deception
originally posted by: Xcathdra
ETA - video footage of explosion near nuke plant (300 meters / 1000 ft).
MSN - Watch: Russian missile strikes within 300 metres of Ukraine nuclear power plant
Twitter link
This what what they are saying on the link -
"Shortly. Viyna. Day 208. Videodagest Briefly. War. Day 208. Video digest" - courtesy babelfish translation.
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
a reply to: clusterfok
Did you see an ammo dump?
Or what happens when an ammo dump is hit?
I didn't.
Good catch on the video cut though, I'll keep an eye out for an uncut version.
Key Takeaways
* Urgent discussion on September 19 among Russia’s proxies of the need for Russia to immediately annex Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts (much of the latter of which are not under Russian control) suggests that Ukraine’s ongoing northern counter-offensive is panicking proxy forces and some Kremlin decision-makers.
* Ukrainian counter-offensive successes are degrading morale among Russian units that were regarded as elite prior to the invasion of Ukraine.
* Ukrainian forces are likely continuing limited and localized offensive operations across the Oskil River and along the Lyman-Yampil-Bilohorivka line.
* Russian forces continued ground attacks south of Bakhmut.
* Ukrainian forces are continuing to strike Russian military, transportation, and logistics assets in Kherson Oblast.
* Ukrainian and Russian sources identified three areas of kinetic activity on September 19: northwest of Kherson City, near the Ukrainian bridgehead over the Inhulets River, and in northern Kherson Oblast near Olhine.
* The size of volunteer units Russia can generate is likely decreasing.
originally posted by: paraphi
a reply to: Kenzo
Russia trying to avoid the "mobilisation" word.
Wonder if the teachers will be serving tooth to jowl with the scum of the earth, recruited from Russian prisons. Poor teachers.
originally posted by: clusterfok
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
a reply to: clusterfok
Did you see an ammo dump?
Or what happens when an ammo dump is hit?
I didn't.
Good catch on the video cut though, I'll keep an eye out for an uncut version.
I can't see anything in that video, and that's my point.
Yep, I know what happens when an ammo dump gets hit. You get fireworks that can last for hours, but you're probably thinking of small caliber rifle ammo. I was thinking more of artillery shells. You get one big boom, and that's it.
It's impossible to tell either way, so there's really no point in trying to have discussion about it.
Instead, I'd like to clarify my stand on the Russian tactical weakness of not hitting civilian targets with obvious military value.
You know that story of two guys running from a bear, where one guy says to the other: "I don't have to run fast. I just have to run faster than you."
Assuming that Russians have studied Boyd's theory on warfare, they're probably thinking that they have to act like angels in order to win the moral(e) warfare. That couldn't be further from the truth. They only have to be slightly more moral than the other (U.S.) side... and U.S. is extremely hard to catch up to (in terms of becoming more immoral than the U.S.), with its history of Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria... not to mention the whole bloody and (almost unimaginably) sick history of the CIA in Latin America.
If Russians were smarter, they'd pay less attention to the moral side of fighting U.S., and more to the mental and physical ones, where they're seriously lagging behind.
some of Russia's Black Sea fleet submarines were forced to retreat. Russia’s Navy has relocated some of its submarines from the port of Sevastopol in Crimea to Novorossiysk in Krasnodor Krai, southern Russia, according to the latest intelligence briefing from the British Ministry of Defence.
originally posted by: Kenzo
Russian duma just made some tweaking to criminal code, since they want to prevent troops surrender/ refuse .
If surrender , 3 to 10 years....does any other country has this kind of laws ?