It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
My claim about the second missile was that it hit outside the building,
So TL;DR Russia still hit the mall with a missile because they got # aim.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: merka
My claim about the second missile was that it hit outside the building,
Is that so? It sure doesn't look like that was your claim.
Here is your claim and the link to where you made it in this thread.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
So TL;DR Russia still hit the mall with a missile because they got # aim.
First missile hit the mall smack in the back, clearly. The low angle it's coming in at and the unrefutable video proof show this, as feeble as your attempts to disprove it is.
The second missile hit just on the edge of the factory and most likely at a higher angle to create a deep crater and blowing out the entire side of the factory, which is what your earlier video show.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Xcalibur254
Well, OK, it seems like it wasn't nonfunctioning so they got that wrong.
I will point out that Ukraine got it wrong as well. There were not 1,000 people in there and the mall wasn't attacked. Those are things they could have verified within the first hour or at the very least that day.
I do remember seeing a drone video of the mall from the front and if you look towards the very back, you can see what looks like the spot of impact glowing red hot.
As we know now the impact site was not even on mall property.
As a reminder
As such take everything as a possibility and NOT as absolute truth.
The very first casualty in a war is the truth and all warfare is based on deception
As a reminder
As such take everything as a possibility and NOT as absolute truth.
The very first casualty in a war is the truth and all warfare is based on deception
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: Grimpachi
What is your damage dude? The problem ain’t what angle or where from it was fired… the problem is that Russian missiles are raining down on Ukraine to begin with!
originally posted by: merka
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Xcalibur254
Well, OK, it seems like it wasn't nonfunctioning so they got that wrong.
I will point out that Ukraine got it wrong as well. There were not 1,000 people in there and the mall wasn't attacked. Those are things they could have verified within the first hour or at the very least that day.
I do remember seeing a drone video of the mall from the front and if you look towards the very back, you can see what looks like the spot of impact glowing red hot.
As we know now the impact site was not even on mall property.
Oh.
Are you talking about the drone footage that clearly proves the central point of impact was inside the mall?
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Grimpachi
Russia should never have invaded Ukraine and you really need to stop with the bs propaganda lies. Donetsk is occupied territory of Ukraine and Russia and the fake Republics have military units inside Donetsk, contrary to the lies you tell. Like insisting there are no russian / fake republic military units in Donetsk.
I look forward to you trying to lie your way out of the hole you dug for yourself.
There is video evidence showing a Russian missile hitting to shopping center.