It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: vance
a reply to: PatriotGames4u
Yes Putin really made a huge miscalculation. Especially taking this long for his forces to accomplish his goals.
The Russians invaders are getting their asses kicked. This in turn is causing the surviving conscripts, who lack motivation in the first place, to rape, pillage and burn the defenseless civilian population and infrastructure. Their only 'triumphs'.
In the meantime, the ukrainian soldier is getting valuable experience over the same time scale and some good training as well. Nothing like the motivation of a soldier defending his homeland.
I do feel bad for the Russian invader's Mothers. War is hell, I hope that the Russian invaders go home and accept this defeat. Because one thing is a fact, if their dictator doesn't go nuclear, the ukrainians will be victorious đź‘Ť
originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
a reply to: alphabetaone
They are playing word games.
The U.S. has secretly had posession of an s300 made by russia for a very long time at one of our testing facilities.
We broke opsec in that decades old program and donated the entire s300 from our test facility to Ukraine about a month ago when russia started attacking Kiev using planes that take off from belarus, since Ukraine didn't have enough old russian gear to defend from that direction.
Russia has falsely claimed that they've destroyed the donated s300 in a variety of crazy and crazier ways, all of them false reports of course, but they'll eventually succeed in destroying it.
Now they're playing word games to make it sound like we provided a higher quality American radar and missile system, when it's the same s300 that Ukraine already had, the fact that we had analyzed this particular one in the American desert for a decade or two doesn't make it any less of a russian anti aircraft system.
Wanna know what other russian weapons we have at our testing facilities?
Me too. Because we should immediately donate everything non nuclear to Ukraine for use against russia.
Greece has the s-300 system as well and they originally donated them to the US for stealth testing. a f-22 can get within 22 nm of a s-300 before detection.
I wasn't aware of the Greek system, though it wouldn't surprise me a bit, especially since the detection distance you stated is pretty damn close to accurate (we can actually get closer than that under certain conditions).
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
a reply to: alphabetaone
They are playing word games.
The U.S. has secretly had posession of an s300 made by russia for a very long time at one of our testing facilities.
We broke opsec in that decades old program and donated the entire s300 from our test facility to Ukraine about a month ago when russia started attacking Kiev using planes that take off from belarus, since Ukraine didn't have enough old russian gear to defend from that direction.
Russia has falsely claimed that they've destroyed the donated s300 in a variety of crazy and crazier ways, all of them false reports of course, but they'll eventually succeed in destroying it.
Now they're playing word games to make it sound like we provided a higher quality American radar and missile system, when it's the same s300 that Ukraine already had, the fact that we had analyzed this particular one in the American desert for a decade or two doesn't make it any less of a russian anti aircraft system.
Wanna know what other russian weapons we have at our testing facilities?
Me too. Because we should immediately donate everything non nuclear to Ukraine for use against russia.
Greece has the s-300 system as well and they originally donated them to the US for stealth testing. a f-22 can get within 22 nm of a s-300 before detection.
I wasn't aware of the Greek system, though it wouldn't surprise me a bit, especially since the detection distance you stated is pretty damn close to accurate (we can actually get closer than that under certain conditions).
well a f-22 can hit them out at 65 nm with a glide bomb,without a lock on so they dont even see it coming from 100 k feet. In a full EM environmant i believe it was 15 miles using terrain masking and other tricks.
originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
a reply to: alphabetaone
They are playing word games.
The U.S. has secretly had posession of an s300 made by russia for a very long time at one of our testing facilities.
We broke opsec in that decades old program and donated the entire s300 from our test facility to Ukraine about a month ago when russia started attacking Kiev using planes that take off from belarus, since Ukraine didn't have enough old russian gear to defend from that direction.
Russia has falsely claimed that they've destroyed the donated s300 in a variety of crazy and crazier ways, all of them false reports of course, but they'll eventually succeed in destroying it.
Now they're playing word games to make it sound like we provided a higher quality American radar and missile system, when it's the same s300 that Ukraine already had, the fact that we had analyzed this particular one in the American desert for a decade or two doesn't make it any less of a russian anti aircraft system.
Wanna know what other russian weapons we have at our testing facilities?
Me too. Because we should immediately donate everything non nuclear to Ukraine for use against russia.
Greece has the s-300 system as well and they originally donated them to the US for stealth testing. a f-22 can get within 22 nm of a s-300 before detection.
I wasn't aware of the Greek system, though it wouldn't surprise me a bit, especially since the detection distance you stated is pretty damn close to accurate (we can actually get closer than that under certain conditions).
well a f-22 can hit them out at 65 nm with a glide bomb,without a lock on so they dont even see it coming from 100 k feet. In a full EM environmant i believe it was 15 miles using terrain masking and other tricks.
I really appreciate your post on the subject, but it's getting uncomfortably close to the list of topics my defense industry employer doesn't want any employees to discuss online, so I have no comment.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: PatriotGames4u
a reply to: alphabetaone
They are playing word games.
The U.S. has secretly had posession of an s300 made by russia for a very long time at one of our testing facilities.
We broke opsec in that decades old program and donated the entire s300 from our test facility to Ukraine about a month ago when russia started attacking Kiev using planes that take off from belarus, since Ukraine didn't have enough old russian gear to defend from that direction.
Russia has falsely claimed that they've destroyed the donated s300 in a variety of crazy and crazier ways, all of them false reports of course, but they'll eventually succeed in destroying it.
Now they're playing word games to make it sound like we provided a higher quality American radar and missile system, when it's the same s300 that Ukraine already had, the fact that we had analyzed this particular one in the American desert for a decade or two doesn't make it any less of a russian anti aircraft system.
Wanna know what other russian weapons we have at our testing facilities?
Me too. Because we should immediately donate everything non nuclear to Ukraine for use against russia.
Greece has the s-300 system as well and they originally donated them to the US for stealth testing. a f-22 can get within 22 nm of a s-300 before detection.
I wasn't aware of the Greek system, though it wouldn't surprise me a bit, especially since the detection distance you stated is pretty damn close to accurate (we can actually get closer than that under certain conditions).
well a f-22 can hit them out at 65 nm with a glide bomb,without a lock on so they dont even see it coming from 100 k feet. In a full EM environmant i believe it was 15 miles using terrain masking and other tricks.
I really appreciate your post on the subject, but it's getting uncomfortably close to the list of topics my defense industry employer doesn't want any employees to discuss online, so I have no comment.
NP. the black tris can do even better btw. hover in near plain sight and fry electronics,basically fusing their circuits,but i digress. you have a good night.
Wanna know what other russian weapons we have at our testing facilities?
originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: PatriotGames4u
Wanna know what other russian weapons we have at our testing facilities?
Some of the captured gear was far better than suspected.
Cheers
As a reminder
As such take everything as a possibility and NOT as absolute truth.
The very first casualty in a war is the truth and all warfare is based on deception
originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: PatriotGames4u
The early MiGs were far more maneuverable than our people had believed.
Not sure how many aircraft they got to play with; I know one -23 was lost because of a unwise decision to pilot it by a USAF general (who lost his life while ejecting).
Cheers
As a reminder
As such take everything as a possibility and NOT as absolute truth.
The very first casualty in a war is the truth and all warfare is based on deception
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: PatriotGames4u
I doubt it considering Russia is doing the negotiating for Iran. It's probably the Iranian leaders looking at the to do check list, seeing the make comment about Ukraine war while no one in the world is watching, check the box and move on.