It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This would cause battle lines to be drawn and from all appearances, the world was about to fight it out. At that point, the military would take over and set everything straight.
I don’t know what is going to happen. I’m not an oracle. I’m just a satirist. But we are getting dangerously close to the point where GloboCap will need to go full-blown fascist if they want to finish what they started. If that happens, things are going to get very ugly. I know, things are already ugly, but I’m talking a whole different kind of ugly. Think Jonestown, or Hitler’s final days in the bunker, or the last few months of the Manson Family.
That is what happens to totalitarian movements and death cults once the spell is broken and their official narratives fall apart.
When they go down, they try to take the whole world with them.
I don’t know about you, but I’m hoping we can avoid that. From what I have heard and read, it isn’t much fun.
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
Wow, synchronicity again EtMN,... ma was relating about a Rothschild telling her the history of Reuters at some social do.
"Started by Paul Reuters in his 20s then kept in the family when his son took over..."
Anywho... after reading your post, I checked out the Wiki.
It reads to me like Paul Reuters started as a lackey of the Rothschilds; running their communications, which needed to be faster than anyone else's if they were to "control both sides of all wars". This initially started with carrier pigeons. Then they set him up as a company when they saw the need for more fine-tuned control as everyone started getting faster communication through the telegraph? He HAD to build it into the most trusted communications company or the Rothschilds would lose their communications advantage?
The son's "suicide" in 1915 (2nd year of WW I) looksvery dubious to me as it allowed a George Roderick Jones to take over the company (for the Rothschilds?).
Interestingly, George Roderick Jones was the great grandfather of ex-UK PM David Cameron's wife, Samantha Cameron, via Viscountess Astor!
In 1920, Jones married the author Enid Bagnold, and they had four children.[1] Their only daughter, Laurian, was born in 1921,[9] and was married first, from 1952 to 1955, to Rowland Winn,[10] and second to Anne-Pierre d’Harcourt, the son of Robert d'Harcourt.[8] A son, Timothy Angus Jones, was born in 1924[11] and later married Patricia David Pandora Clifford, daughter of Sir Bede Clifford,[12] becoming the father of Annabel Astor, who is the mother of Samantha Cameron.
Now consider how Jones took over Reuters 4 years after the sinking of the Titanic and death of John Jacob Astor IV, then 2 generations later one of his grandchildren becomes Viscountess Astor??
A worthy dig for someone better at genealogy and social history than me.
originally posted by: PillarOfFire
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: MountainLaurel
Interesting question from my perspective, ML.
On the one hand, in a trusting world - yes, of course I'd give blood again!
On the other hand though:
We know these satanists drink the blood of their victims not just for the adrenochrome but because they think they gain some of the victims soul energy from it... I would like some clarity on that before "diluting" my soul energy!
I often wonder if anyone's paying attention to what they do in churches. Drinking the red koolaid (blood) and eating the flesh (bread). In catholic churches, they tell people during catechism the wafer is literally the eating of jesus.
There's a lot more info regarding how everything is connected which may well cause world wide heart attacks when they find out who is really being worshipped.
Link
2,000 year old gold coated jewish Torah decorated with satanic symbolism.
originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: Guyfriday
What are we missing about Ukraine? Russia could just shut off gas lines from going through there, food production can be done in shipping containers year-round, and its wintertime so starting a war with Russia is certain failure for any forces going in. So, what's so important about Ukraine?
Without getting into possible personal motivations of Putin, for the Russian state, a lot of it is geopolitics. The northeast of Ukraine is just too close to Moscow and the terrain between the two is not particularly difficult for military forces to cross. That may be why, in the eyes of the Russian state, economic sanctions aren't seen as a solution.
This situation has driven policy of Muscovy for centuries.
Cheers
originally posted by: crankyoldman
Anyone else find it odd that "wordle" is perpetually trending on the twit?
Also Trending Twit
Said it here in 2018. NK/SK unified, it will be rolled out slowly. Why? People, evidently, can deal with an Olympic Athlete saying he's a woman and not miss a beat, even cast a vote for him/her/them/they as governor. But somehow NK must be a perpetual enemy or folks loose their minds. 60 years of relentless programming is hard to break it seems.
In fairness. In a polarity reality, stability requires the "enemy" exist to create contrast, so, strangely, declaring world wide peace would throw things into total chaos. Posted here REALLY early was a paper written in the 60's (Rand corp maybe?) saying that exact thing but without an understanding of the polarity problem. We want peace, but without the enemy to define it we cannot pursue it, as such, we cannot get it. Loop.
It really helps to see the polarity reality system at work and break the limitations it creates. There is really no need to "live" by it, observe it-yes, live within for now-yes, but by it- no. Frankly, using it to one's advantage is a good idea.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: FlyingFox
Time for a new Rand Paul grilling of Fauci.
originally posted by: Thoughtful1
Biden identified 5 republican senators "who told me that they agree with whatever I'm talking about them to do."
The reporter asks who are the 5.