It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: toktaylor
Just look at it this way , there’s no evidence for any god at all. There will always be far more variables required for an invisible, intelligent, eternal God to create something, than for that thing to have just always existed, in some form, on its own.
originally posted by: cooperton
This does not happen by random chance
originally posted by: peck420
Mix random chance with billions of chances and anything is possible
originally posted by: cooperton
If that's true then the existence of an omnipotent God is included in those
Which then makes you realize it was God the whole time. But he didn't have to use some trash random mutation algorithm to make it lol.
originally posted by: daskakik
So now something from nothing is fine as long as the result is your sky daddy?
originally posted by: cooperton
No I was showing that even using his wild imagination scenario that it still renders true that an omnipotent God exists. It's unavoidable. Unless you are stubbornly illogical and suppose that logic was not required to make logical beings. But the obvious answer is that we logical beings come from something logical.
originally posted by: daskakik
You don't see it do you?
Using his wild imagination scenario, you said it still renders an omnipotent God, which would be a logical being springing up without the need for a logical being to create it.
originally posted by: daskakik
So that omnipotent God that sprung up using his wild imagination scenario isn't intelligent?
originally posted by: cooperton
Notice how you have to convolute simple logic just to avoid admitting that logic doesn't come to be illogically?
originally posted by: daskakik
I'm not convoluting anything. They said given enough tries and time anything is possible. You said that includes an omnipotent god. That means an intelligent being without the need for an intelligent being to create them.
It ain't that hard to follow.
So which is it?
originally posted by: cooperton
1) his pre-conditions are not true or applicable to the real world. The world does not allow anything to be possible over time. There are laws and conditions that prevent certain things from happening.
originally posted by: visitedbythem
My dad is a genius scientist. He has many titles in several fields. He has been summoned to the Whitehouse before. His favorite thing is math. He told me years ago, that he found evidence of intelligent design, with math.
originally posted by: cooperton
Imaginary: if anything is possible, then this includes the possibility that an omnipotent God exists
Real life: if there are laws and limits within logical confines, then it stands true that something logical must come to be through something logical.
originally posted by: daskakik
And we are back to the question nobody can answer, well another one, who made god if intelligent beings can only come from intelligent beings?
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: visitedbythem
He is correct here is just one example