It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
originally posted by: crankyoldman
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: crankyoldman
originally posted by: Caled
First, I think you are right. And probably also to kill most of us. But here is the real head scratcher. Why? I’m not driven to control people like a lot of people I know, but really…what is the whole point of being an overlord of stupid people? I can’t imagine there is much fun in it any more than being in charge of a bunch of toasters. There is an endgame to all of this. We’re all missing something. Some piece of information.
originally posted by: pheonix358
The Elite want nothing more than to dumb us down, we know this!
Now, the rub. The system in place here is hierarchical in nature. The top dictates all. When the top is removed, or compromised, the lower echelons fall to pieces, as they are incapable of acting alone or creating a new leader. This is the double edged sword. They are weak yes, but dangerous. Hence why The Plan is more methodical then flash. Cornered rabid rats with nothing to live for and nothing to die for are a problem.
That paragraph reminds me of General Colin Powell's presentation on how to win the Iraq War. On a TV special report, Powell put up a snake-looking graphic of Iraq, with Saddam Hussein's face as the head. He said, "we will cut off the head of the snake, and the war will easily be won."
In my mind, that's how you can turn a lot of things around. As with election-cheating, large-scale actions are not needed, in order to be victorious. There are a relative few "leaders" causing most of the trouble. (I must stop there. ATS rules.)
Can I give 10,000 stars?
I remember Powell repeating those words at every opportunity when I was a young something or other, and speculating that it was a very clever psyop.
Even had a wide variety of theories about what the objective could possible be.
EVERYONE thought I had completely lost my mind.
I'm not saying they were wrong.
And none of those original theories were even close IMO.
After years of occasional reflection I came upon what I think is a pretty solid theory.
Or maybe I'm just nutz.
I think those few carefully crafted and often repeated words were both completely honest and extremely deceptive at the same time.
Bad guys took it literally as expected and reacted in some ways that were very helpful to the good guys.
This was very important because good guys had a lot more weaknesses than most could know.
Excellent leadership, brilliant plan, and our brave young men and women saved the day for us.
And a lot of good luck.
Enemy's stupidity was also immensely helpful.
Powell's 'creative' few words were not to be taken so literally as to mean that we cared even a little bit about hunting down Hussein and his top brass hiding in Baghdad or somewhere.
He just wanted to make sure they were bunkering down somewhere safe. As far from the battlefield as possible kind of place.
Not just those few words though, I see quite a few other actions in the days leading up to that fateful first night of the air war that seem to have intentionally (by the good guys) caused the bad guys to react in some small way that turned out to be a significant advantage for the good guys.
I don't believe in coincidences, and I don't think Powell could believe what he heard when first told of how the bad guys reacted to his feint.
He couldn't have possibly imagined that the plan could ever have worked that well.
The bad guys moved nearly all of their most important people AND equipment FAR away from the battlefield.
And then Powell turned out the lights.
In every single part of Iraq he desired.
The bad guys apparently didn't see that one coming.
Zero communication ability remained for enemy leadership far away from all their solders who had been given very stern orders to not do ANYTHING until they received specific instructions from their chain of command.
Suddenly, and permanently, the bad guy's 'body' was permanently severed from it's HEAD-Quarters.
And we easily won the war.
We are much better now at almost everything.
Or maybe I'm just a homeless woman who found an iPhone while looking for cans and started typing random things.
Does it matter?
That demonstrates the point. Iraq and Libya became hell on earth without their leader to keep things in check. Powell and company knew this and wanted it - that was the entire point of the effort. You can tell when the leadership is in trouble, the drones lose their way and their minds. Leaderless drones do not develop smarts, skills, unity overnight despite what teeeveee insists. In can take decades up to eons.
Do you think everything from the early trump attacks on was an intentional and organized effort between a significant number of dem polititations and various international bad guys to create a leadership vacuum that would cause great harm to America?
I do.
Some here are gathering a great deal of evidence.
While others fight hard to keep the madness going
It isn't over yet.
originally posted by: SkipperJohn
Do you remember Trump did this? what was the real reason behind it??
Trump Administration Reverses Standards For Energy-Efficient Lightbulbs
Link
originally posted by: FlyingFox
a reply to: Justoneman
I agree, and I fixed-up my position on the issue.
It is strange, and somewhat inexplicable. I'm skewed towards realism, and many here are Esoterics by nature. I want to analyze data, not second hand accounts and re-interpret ancient artifacts with a conclusion already in mind. That's why I asked for cold facts and hard evidence. I think everyone here who read the posts has moved towards the middle ground, which is a good thing.
Is it possible to know, one way or another? From the con side, we know there's no physical evidence, on the pro side the evidence is very tenuous and not substantial. The burden of proof is on the ones making the extraordinary claims.
originally posted by: pheonix358
Yes, I know, another one.
Watch it twice, once for the comedy and once to start to understand the logic of MSM.
Many people currently alive think just like the sketch.
P
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: crankyoldman
At this point Im not even sure John Durham is a real person. I think hes maybe a shared hallucination, a myth.
In a video, first revealed on the Guido Fawkes political blog , a 20-year-old Gove is shown in his days at the Oxford Union in a full kilt, before revealing what's under it - nothing.
Gove removes his boxers for the stunt, before tossing them into the crowd. He then makes a bawdy joke about a colleague wanting to get into his boxers.
Michael Gove could add to rich history of Tory sex scandals as embarrassing 'five-in-a-bed romp' details emerge
Gove, who was born in Edinburgh before being adopted and being brought up in Aberdeen, says that there is still no proof that he has honoured tradition and gone fully commando.
originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
Another dinner out with the wife. Restaurant employees no longer masked up. The eminence front is winding down.