It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: imthegoat
originally posted by: tanstaafl
"I'm talking about canceling their vacation...
Can 4 of them cancel their vacation term? Or, would they each decide individually? Or would it have to be 5-4? Or unanimous?"
"A full court meeting of the Supreme Court judges was held on August 6 where the cancellation of all vacations effective from that very day was announced"
Taken from here. That would make it seem they're not taking any vacations.
Ummm... wtf?
I'm talking about the US Supreme Court, not the Supreme Court of Bangladesh...
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: carewemust
The U.S. Supreme Court has ACCEPTED the Texas vs GA-PA-WI-MI case?!? That's huge!
Where? The docket link doesn't show anything like that...?
In the text of the link provided the SCOTUS says the request is denied because there is not enough time and ordered Pennsylvania to continue to separate the ballots based on the time they came in so that when they do get time, they will review the case.
originally posted by: crankyoldman
Without context that made me laugh. With context more so.
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: 0311Warrior
Terrific Evening My Fellow Patriots!
Do not worry about the shadows for they are meant to obscure.
Do not worry about the propaganda spewing from traitors.
Continue to Pray!
Stay Vigilant
Be Ready
For those of you who are my brothers and sisters in arms:
Remember your Oath
Psalm 91
Semper Fidelis
I don't know if it was planned but our Mil folks have contingencies for every pathway they can think of.
Your arrival has boosted the morale of those who were feeling down. Most of us are here for the long haul and have faith in our Q brothers in arms and the plan.
While it has been 50+ years since I last unassed a slick, I and many others are ready to help in any way we can if called on. I suspect that it will be all over by the time everyone figures things out so that the good-intentioned will not muddy things up and inadvertently put you in harm's way.
the right is aggressive? the right is aggressive?
originally posted by: Hamlin
a reply to: Aallanon
Why are the right so aggressive? What peril?
Don't tell me what I can't use either thanks, unless you are suddenly for censorship.
My opinion comes from Trump lost and Q failed.
Claiming someone's opinion is invalid because they don't agree with you is not good. Do you ignore all pro-Q/pro-DJT posters because they come from that opinion? Are you only interested in listening to people who agree with you? Maybe you should re-examine you stance, you seem to exhibit the same behaviours that you rabidly fear the left will impose on you.
Q said they never thought Hillary would lose. Q said Trump was needed. Q said Trump will bring justice. Q said they "have it all". Q said "these people are stupid". Trump lost. Q lost. What now? Was it just all BS or is this still part of the plan?