It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: butcherguy
If the part about Nancy Pelosi having this information all along is true... No wonder she looks so sick lately. Imagine what she is going to look like a week from now.
I say this because the Harris campaign's Dead Grass tour seems to be as budget as possible.
....Judd Deere, a White House spokesperson, said President Donald Trump had already come to the state’s assistance when his administration authorized increased funding for debris removal from the fires as well as relief for the August fires.
“The more recent and separate California submission was not supported by the relevant data that states must provide for approval, and the President concurred with the FEMA Administrator’s recommendation,” Deere said.
........“Billions of dollars are sent to the State of California for Forest fires that, with proper Forest Management, would never happen,” Trump tweeted in January 2019. “Unless they get their act together, which is unlikely, I have ordered FEMA to send no more money.”.....
originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
Nancy ain't gonna be happy about this. Or will she somehow perceive a chance to become President Pelosi with that aid of these revelations ?
Cheers
originally posted by: Aallanon
a reply to: crankyoldman
That’s very interesting. Follow the money.
If this all unravels, it will be earth shattering.
Here’s a thought, what if Q wanted it to only go so far but can’t control it?
I am a big believer in the law of unintended consequences.
originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: F2d5thCavv2
WTF are they doing with the supposed hundreds of millions of dollars they are pulling in every month then? I dont get it....
originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Have I missed something?
I thought the Senate Judiciary Committee was going to have their committee vote on confirming ACB yesterday, so that it could go forward to full senate next week?
Has that vote been held? I've not seen any news on it...
The Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee set Oct. 22 as the date for the panel’s vote on the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, overruling Democratic objections...
originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
It is not dependent on an election.
It is not dependent on Barr.
It is not dependent on Durham.
Per E, at any rate.
And, from Paul Furber:
Stay on the path patriots. Don't deviate. Ignore the liars, the naysayers and the disinformation agents. The traitors in the MSM, social media and big tech will be defeated
Cheers