It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: pasiphae
His link is correct
The wiki link may have said what he said it did, but it wasn't right according to the CDC, as I just showed.
Of course, I don't trust any of these medical mafiasos, so, whatever...
Contractors working during a refueling project at the Limerick Generating Station are “terrified” they’re working in a “breeding ground” for COVID-19 and expressed concerns about the company’s safety practices during the pandemic. “I’m in a constant state of paranoia. In my opinion, it’s just a complete breeding ground, a cesspool for this,” said one man, who spoke on condition of anonymity to MediaNews Group out of fear of losing his job. The contractor said supplemental workers began showing up at the plant days before a Unit 1 refueling outage began on March 27. Montgomery County officials have said they were informed that up to 1,400 contractors may have been summoned to work on the project as a coronavirus outbreak was taking shape in the county.
“From the first day I got there, there were no less than 100 people in the training room being processed. I have pictures from that day of people literally sitting on top of each other, no one enforcing social distancing,” the man said on Friday. “There were computer labs for people to take the tests they need to get into the plant, people sitting at every computer elbow to elbow. So, I’ve been concerned since the minute I walked in there.”During shift changes, he said, people from both shifts congregated in the break room “standing room only, just packed in there.” “They did not enforce any social distancing whatsoever until this past Wednesday (April 1) when the news got to the media. That’s when they started enforcing some social distancing,” the man claimed. “Being put at risk like this makes us mad.” The contractor described the current social distancing at the plant as “a half-assed thing.” “They made us sit further apart in the break room. But that first week and a half we were elbow to elbow with 40 people in the break room at any given time,” he claimed.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Dr. Anthony Fauci, the government’s top infectious disease expert, said Tuesday the U.S. does not yet have the critical testing and tracing procedures needed to begin reopening the nation’s economy, adding a dose of caution to increasingly optimistic projections from the White House. “We have to have something in place that is efficient and that we can rely on, and we’re not there yet,” Fauci said in an interview with The Associated Press.
Fauci said a May 1 target is “a bit overly optimistic” for many areas of the country. Any easing off the strict social-distancing rules in place in much of the country would have to occur on a “rolling” basis, not all at once, he said, reflecting the ways COVID-19 struck different parts of the country at different times. Among Fauci’s top concerns: that there will be new outbreaks in locations where social distancing has eased, but public health officials don’t yet have the capabilities to rapidly test for the virus, isolate any new cases and track down everyone that an infected person came into contact with. “I’ll guarantee you, once you start pulling back there will be infections. It’s how you deal with the infections that’s going count,” Fauci told the AP. Key is “getting people out of circulation if they get infected, because once you start getting clusters, then you’re really in trouble,” he added.
originally posted by: CrazeeWorld777
I think we've been duped into believing this virus is a mass killer to force everyone into lockdown. It's some kind of control the authorities wanted probably because of the mass unrest which was going on at the time in quite a few Countries!
If you look at worldometers figures for deaths per million population, it really is miniscule and doesn't really require any mass lockdown on the scale that it has been. It may infect a lot but kill rate as I said is miniscule per population. This isn't anywhere near as bad as Spanish flu or bubonic plague!
Go check it out for yourselves on www.worldometers.info/coronavirus
We've been duped and are now under complete control by the 1%.
BUT having said that... this lockdown should make people open their eyes as to what really matters in life!
Our life and health. More important than money!
originally posted by: McGinty
Sorry if this has been asked already (or if indeed it’s a dumb question)... is it possible that this virus went round much earlier than we’re told? Throughout the west as early as last autumn (I believe there’s clues this was the case with the Spanish Flu; being suffered in the US before it broke in Spain).
originally posted by: Halfswede
The " death curve" it follows in each country seem to follow the October/China timeline. It appears that it probably began to spread elsewhere likely weeks or a month at most before each area/country started noticing.
Nothing really seems to suggest otherwise except social media people saying they had coughs and pneumonic symptoms. Without antibody checks, you kind of have to go with the fact that it was probably just the normal stew of stuff. Severe coughs and deadly pneumonia have been in the system a long time.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: tanstaafl
"Of course, I don't trust any of these medical mafiasos, so, whatever..."
So, you just go with what you want to go with?
I posted a link to the CDC website directly contradicting the OP's numbers.
originally posted by: CrazeeWorld777
a reply to: MrRCflying
But has it kept the death totals down? Look at NYC for example or Italy, Spain??
a reply to: SixDemonBag
a reply to: tanstaafl
"That is where I got my number from...
8,958 deaths divided by 73,758 confirmed cases equals 1.2% CFR."
That’s 12%, not 1.2.
originally posted by: CrazeeWorld777
a reply to: MrRCflying
But has it kept the death totals down? Look at NYC for example or Italy, Spain??
originally posted by: pasiphae
I'm sure you won't read this but you can't cite ESTIMATED cases compared to lab confirmed Covid cases.
You keep twisting the numbers.... like your CFR % which was incorrect math. Multiple people pointed that out. You have zero credibility by using faulty math and citing estimated numbers compared to lab confirmed.