It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Jay-morris
Even once they did allow the WHO to send in a team, that team didn't get open access to the problem.
This is my favorite part, after WHO got in there and were shielded from seeing what they needed to see, they came out and said it wasn't much of a problem.
All these big NGOs do this. Look at the IAEA. They'll go into Iran, Iran will only let them look in certain places, then they come back and report "No problem here!"
Mother#er, how do you know? You weren't allowed to see what you needed to see? Who are you to go telling the world everything is fine when you don't have enough information to make a determination one way or the other? But they have to pat themselves on the back for having "assessed the situation." So here's their #ing REPORT, useless as it is, that everyone takes as gospel because it's the WHO.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Jay-morris
Bwhahahaa...
I think they don’t care and their health, worker safety and quality controls are pathetic.
And yeah, when an American company does something stupid or unethical they get a hefty lawsuit or jail time.
Consequences..
In China they rename the company and continue...
originally posted by: ThouArtGod
Under its newest COVID-19 prevention guidelines, China does not include in its overall daily count for total and for new cases those who retest positive after being released from medical care. China also does not include asymptomatic cases in case counts.
"I have no idea why the authorities choose not to count [asymptomatic] cases in the official case count. I am baffled," said one of the Wuhan doctors who had a second positive test after recovering.
The source is NPR, so the facts should at least be correct.
SO this is insane. When the world is discussing how we can test those who may already have had this and are now immune... When countries are desperate for information so that they can scientifically plan for outbreaks... when those on all sides are using collated information to push their narrative/advocate for courses of action...
China goes and admits that they have been withholding information all along, especially critical information that is extremely pertinent to modeling, planning, and in the end, saving lives/economies (separate, but not mutually exclusive). I have speculated since the beginning that China was, or must, be lying about its infection rates and here is real proof. I wonder if this guy will wake up dead tomorrow... or find himself working in a concentration camp as a "doctor".
For the drones who are now failing to comprehend the thread...
This is not fake news. It is not about the failure rate of the testing method (although that is quite interesting!) It is about the fact that China is NOT reporting those who test positive, but are asymptomatic. If I need to explain why that is maddeningly huge, please ask below!
originally posted by: SacredLore
a reply to: TommyJohnson
I have provided the link that mentions the hospital in New York where your wife can get the best treatment should it come to the worst. If you find an independent MD just ask him if he would use the same treatment.
Watch this, too!
The important message is: Getting sick from Corona is NOT a death sentence. Not by a long shot.
Here are effective measures you can take in addition to trying to avoid the virus.
Follow the official Coronavirus recommendations. But don't be afraid, this just weakens your immune system.
Look for results and what people did to overcome Covid-19 successfully.
Getting sleep and rest is crucial:
Also valuable information:
originally posted by: ThouArtGod
a reply to: Jay-morris
Are you now saying that the “officials in Wuhan” are not the government of China? If they aren’t, then how were they supposedly held accountable by them, according to you?
It’s a totalitarian centralized government. “They”, in this case, always refers to the CCP.
originally posted by: choos
a reply to: Jay-morris
i wonder what would cause a high government official to give a bold faced lie to his boss?? surely cant be fear.
oh btw not the first time a high government official lied to his boss recently.. remember after the recent district council election in HK, what happened to the liaison office?
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: choos
a reply to: Jay-morris
i wonder what would cause a high government official to give a bold faced lie to his boss?? surely cant be fear.
oh btw not the first time a high government official lied to his boss recently.. remember after the recent district council election in HK, what happened to the liaison office?
Does not matter what the reason is! They kept it from Beijing! Soon as Beijing knew about the Virus, they came down on it hard. Hence the reason the West is in deep trouble and they are not!
They took the measures needed to get on top of the Virus, and the West did not, and a lot of countries, they still are not.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: choos
a reply to: Jay-morris
i wonder what would cause a high government official to give a bold faced lie to his boss?? surely cant be fear.
oh btw not the first time a high government official lied to his boss recently.. remember after the recent district council election in HK, what happened to the liaison office?
Does not matter what the reason is! They kept it from Beijing! Soon as Beijing knew about the Virus, they came down on it hard. Hence the reason the West is in deep trouble and they are not!
They took the measures needed to get on top of the Virus, and the West did not, and a lot of countries, they still are not.
You say they are not as if you have some kind of inside knowledge.
Why do you believe China has neutralized this virus ?
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Jay-morris
Damn right I’m anti China.
Not much to like