It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Hecate666
a reply to: cirrus12
No it isn't really dangerous. It's less dangerous than previous flus. It has the most coverage ever and the most fear mongering but now we know that this is really not different.
You have to stop listening to MSN now. They lie. Literally, they lie to you and want you scared.
Were you scared in 2017?
Because more people died during that flu season than have so far of this one.
It just wasn't reported like this.
Please use your brains people, it will harm your immune system to worry so much. In teh UK cases are going down because flu season is over.
By the time they have a vaccine, the virus will have either gone away for another year or mutated or whatever. Something that has happened for all of human and animal history.
If you are alive now, all your ancestors survived every epidemic and pandemic there erver was, even the bubonic plague.
We have to stop pedalling the 'really dangerous bit'. It isn't any more dangerous than any flu or any virus before.
What is dangerous is the restrictions and the penalties that keep people in. Suicides will go up and more deaths will happen because of depression lack of VIT D and the following recession, lack of medical availability for other ailments and poverty. Deaths that actually could and can still be prevented if we stop flapping our arms.
By being so gullible, you are indirectly responsible for these deaths. Is that not worrying?
Sweden has never had a lockdown and they have similar numbers to Germany. Holland will follow letting people back out again. And the prediction is that NOWT will happen differently than every frigging year past or future.
WHO 2017 about flu in general:
www.who.int...
Did you stay in that year? did you grass up healthy people who just behaved normally then?
Did we get all tracked by phone?
NO, because there was no fear mongering.
Because this is not anything different. Get a grip and STOP with this unnecessary fear spreading.
Sweden’s government is drawing up new legislation to allow it to take “extraordinary steps” to combat Covid-19, local media have reported, amid concern that its relatively soft approach may be leading to a higher death rate than in other Nordic countries.
Denmark and Norway are among the many countries to have imposed tough lockdowns, closing borders and shutting schools, and Finland has isolated its main urban area around Helsinki. But Swedes are still able to shop, go to restaurants, get a haircut and send children under 16 to class.
On Sunday Sweden reported a total of 401 deaths so far from Covid-19, and acknowledged delays in reporting mean the actual number is likely to be considerably higher. The figure was up 8% from Saturday and is greater than the totals of the other three Nordic nations combined.
originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
a reply to: Hecate666
Let me know if you can find an example of a flu season that directly killed hundreds of doctors, nurses, and paramedics.
originally posted by: FinallyAwake
originally posted by: checkmeout
originally posted by: FinallyAwake
Just read this Sky News article from today, and there is a paragraph that says this;
There has been a suggestion that those who survived the virus could be tested and issued with "immunity certificates", allowing them to return to work. These could be especially useful for healthcare workers but they also raise questions.
There's no mention at all about reinfection, let alone 'deaths' from reinfection.
How do they not know about this?
news.sky.com...
The same way they don't know that you can be infectious past 7 days.
Really?? (genuine intrigue) I thought it was common knowledge that you can be infectious for 10 days after recovery?
I don't follow the MSM, so I might have just read it here somewhere.
originally posted by: CynConcepts
originally posted by: Tamsuan
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ShortBus
Won't the virus just start spreading again?
Most models show a spike toward the end of the year, yes. But not as long lived a spike. The assumption is that natural immunity will become more of a factor. This first go, no one has immunity. Next time, a good percentage of the population will.
How firm is your expectation that people will acquire immunity to this? The common cold (rinovirus/coronavirus) keeps coming back through mutation, doesn't it? HIV stays in the infected person and continues to cause problems.
With all the unknowns around this virus, I don't think we can assume that it will behave like measles.
An jazz artist entertainment friend of mine in Georgia has recovered from Covid19. The CDC even drew blood from him to research it for antibodies. They also gave him a certified letter of release from his stay at home isolation order. So I am guessing that the CDC believes one does create immunity and is not a carrier after recovering.
Edit add: email responses from Georgia Dept of Health
...(removed for space - see quoted post)
From his various conversations, he was advised he is immune and no longer has to worry about face mask or gloves. He has offered to get essentials and necessities for folks in his area with this reassurance that he is now immune and not a carrier.
We know it is in both of our interests to work collaboratively and co-operatively to keep our citizens safe and that's very much the tenor of our conversations and I'm confident that we're going to get there."
He highlighted that thousands of medical workers who live in Canada work every day in the United States, helping to treat novel coronavirus patients in America. He also noted Canada supplies the U.S. with many key COVID-19 supplies including pulp for surgical-grade N95 masks, test kits and gloves.
Trudeau plans to use these examples to ensure the American president understands the inter-connectedness of supply chains and the importance of keeping all goods and services flowing freely between the two countries.
"We recognize that our countries are deeply interlinked in sometimes very complex ways. The necessary goods and services back-and-forth across our border keep us both safe and help us on both sides of the border," Trudeau said.
"We are continuing to engage in constructive discussions with different levels within the administration to highlight that the U.S. will be hurting itself as much as Canada will be hurting if we see an interruption of essential goods and services flow back and forth across the border."
originally posted by: Hecate666
a reply to: cirrus12
No it isn't really dangerous. It's less dangerous than previous flus.
People asking why we (and everyone) missed the first few minutes of @MattHancock 's briefing -
This was because a Wallbox in Downing Street failed.
There’ll be a refeed as soon as the press conference finishes - and we'll bring you those missing minutes on @BBCNews