It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
for domestic needs.
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
If you were tasked with designing a virus that could appear to have come about naturally in order to conduct a depopulation exercise that was both effective in the long and short term ensuring that it prevented the worlds population growing further then this virus has the attributes and characteristics of such a best results wish list tool set. That kills mainly the elderly and the ill and doesn't impact the young too much. It is said that those who have had the virus where it has progressed to the lungs have lung damage which in many cases will probably reduce life expectancy. It is not yet known whether it will re-ignite once it has been in the body. It is said that those recovered can then be re-infected and 2nd infections could be fatal. Apparently it is said to attack the testes because there is a high ABC2 receptor count in the testes which may impact reproduction. One could go on.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: RP2SticksOfDynamite
Why?
And I also find it hard to belief that this virus which appears to be one hell of a tool, is natural.
I also believe that the numbers in China are a lot higher then they are expecting the world to believe. Based on population size China's death rate without accounting for an exponential factor should be at least 145,000, using Italy as a benchmark having only population of 4% of that of China.
I hope I am wrong but as of this moment I think this came from a lab and is a cocktail BW.
Who is responsible now that's a who dunnit?
Do you think mitigation is more viable? Or do you have something else in mind?
I don't think the suppression strategy is a viable option in the US.
My reason is the nature of the beast and its operandi. Its clever, evasive, contagious, asympt, etc. Just as if it had been designed fit for a particular purpose covering the necessary angles to get the job done with longevity in mind whilst passing for natural! Also because China has hidden the truth!
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: RP2SticksOfDynamite
You have provided no reason for it not to be natural.
China took extreme isolation measures and increased their medical capacity. Italy did not. There are indications that infections started in Italy months before they were recognized.
Based on population size China's death rate without accounting for an exponential factor should be at least 145,000, using Italy as a benchmark having only population of 4% of that of China.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: clay2 baraka
for domestic needs.
Strange. The article says it's to protected them from becoming infected overseas.
No more so than any many other infectious diseases. The main thing that makes it dangerous is that there is little, if any immunity to it because it is new. But that is not unique either.
Its clever, evasive, contagious, asympt, etc.
Hi everyone- yesterday I was diagnosed with COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus. Looks like I’ll be ok, but I wanted share my journey with you in the hopes that you find it informative or helpful. Hope you all stay safe, calm, and above all, healthy.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: MrRCflying
I read somewhere that a lot of the new cases in NY are in one Hasidic Jewish community in Brooklyn, so it may be a case of close community contact facilitating an outbreak in a concentrated community. The thing is that something like that is unlikely to spread far beyond itself unlike the South Korean cult.
I don't think Hasidic Jews necessarily circulate too closely with the wider world.
originally posted by: Oleman
These numbers are from memory, so might be off. (I need to get back to working.)
Rough calcs based on NY State response plannning said they need 10x more ICU beds and 3x more resperators.
With the Quinine hydrochloride studies saying it reduces hospital stay from 28-42 days to 6 days, that means NY state already has 70% of the ICU beds needed, instead of 10%.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: peter_kandra
Do you think mitigation is more viable? Or do you have something else in mind?
I don't think the suppression strategy is a viable option in the US.