It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: celltypespecific
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: celltypespecific
Is there a list of all the known deaths with their ages?
Not to my knowledge.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: carewemust
So why aren't we seeing the parades and the back slapping, trump would love to stoke his ego on this, can you explain that...
Because the people who recognize that there is no reason to panic right now, also realize that things could get ugly. We just don't know.
originally posted by: celltypespecific
originally posted by: RMFX1
originally posted by: celltypespecific
originally posted by: clay2 baraka
Here you have it:
The Vatican has confirmed in a statement that Pope Francis and two of his aides have tested positive for the novel Coronavirus.
Pope Francis missed a planned Mass with clergy in Rome yesterday after showing Coronavirus-like symptoms.
The Vatican had earlier said the pontiff, 83, had a slight indisposition and could proceed with the rest of his planned work today.
The pope and his aides have been quarantined and receiving medical attention near Santa Marta, the Vatican hotel where he lives.
The pope was seen coughing and blowing his nose during the Asha Wednesday Mass.
mcmnt.com...
OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mcmnt.com...
What do you mean OMG? He's just a guy. He's nothing important, he sits in front of a sculpture that looks like it was raised from the depths of hell (if you believe in such nonsense) while proclaiming to represent the opposite. His position, nor that of any of his predecessors is never even mention in any of the scriptures. He's just a man, a con man. Couldn't happen to a better man.
I DONT BELIEVE THE POPE HAS CORONAVIRUS..... I would lose my mind if he does....
Lets wait for confirmation.
originally posted by: jedi_hamster
combine "everyone would eventually be exposed" with death rate of this virus. can you really expect people not to panic?
originally posted by: SpartanStoic
There went any meaningful content from China anymore...
Turns out it's not that Internet in #China will be shut down on Mar 1, but the strictest internet info control will take effect. Anything can become "illegal" including making "improper comments on natural disasters and big events". Anyone creating & copying contents is...
Jennifer Zeng Twitter
So CCP can say whatever the hell they want about the virus and we may not ever know different.
My wife had a big fight with her mother about it today, her poor mother is so brainwashed that she thinks there’s zero new cases in her city when every hospital is full and turning patients away.
originally posted by: AngelsDecay
Sorry my friend, but your definition of "explosion" its light years away from the common sense & reality ...
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: solarone
a reply to: GlobalGold
I've been worried about my dog. He's come down with something, hacking cough, vomiting and off his food.
Visit to the vet if he's still the same next week.
Check and make sure it's not a tick.
originally posted by: musicismagic
We now know of 4 life spans of it.
originally posted by: solarone
a reply to: GlobalGold
I've been worried about my dog. He's come down with something, hacking cough, vomiting and off his food.
Visit to the vet if he's still the same next week.
originally posted by: Oppenheimer67
When people say only the old or people with underlying health conditions are at risk, they are often using it to downplay the seriousness of this novel virus. I find this disturbing on many levels, but even if they are making out this number to be insignificant in size alone; lets have a look at this:
A 60 year old dies, and someone will say, well they were old. Even 65 isn't that old, but lets say over 65 is old for arguments sake, and lets use the US as an example:
About 55.3 million Americans are over the age of 65 (ref 1)
That's already a lot, but lets look at everyone under 65:
The prevalence of cancer in the US is around 7.6-12 million people for those under the age of 65. Undiagnosed could be double this (refs 2,3,4)
Around 20 million people, under the age of 65, have diabetes in the US (ref 5)
There's also pregnant women, heart disease, many other conditions that can make you vulnerable. Any one of those groups above contains very large numbers. They are all at higher risk.
Refs
1) www.statista.com...
2) www.researchgate.net...
3) seer.cancer.gov...
4) ecancer.org...
5) www.diabetes.org...
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Mamana12
I wonder how much any of them actually thought rationally before they made their lists up to know what they needed, what they would use, how much, for how long, etc.? How many are just randomly grabbing large amounts of whatever.