It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Willtell
Some rare good news
Recoveries: Chinese health authorities reported that a total of 20,659 patients have recovered and been discharged from hospital.
www.cnn.com...
The main risk for emergence of bat-borne diseases is directly linked to the development of anthropized environment and reduction of natural environments. It is often understood that deforestation and anthropization will lead to the disappearance of species. This is not always true and anthropized environments can provide an acceptable habitat for a large range of bat species, generating thus a higher diversity of bats and in turn of bat-borne viruses next to human dwellings. Anthropization generates a highly diverse environment in the vicinity of human, characterized by differing forest densities. Bats of differing ecology can find in anthropized environments niches compatible with their roosting and hunting needs. Natural environments are highly selective and compatible only with adapted species over a large surface, usually away from human settlements. In the exact contrary, anthropized environments provide a mosaic of ecosystems, very close to each other, each one corresponding to the needs of a given group of bat host. Insectivorous bats will find large populations of insects due to the presence of water, animals, and humans. Furthermore, house lights attract large number of insects at night. Houses and barns offer shelter for cave-dwelling bats while orchard and field can attract frugivorous bats. This environment is favorable to the occurrence of key parameters identified for virus transmission in large colonies of cave bats, i.e. shared roosting areas, close contact of different species, and regular introduction of infected individuals [45, 58]. However, in this specific environment, there is an additional aspect, the proximity of humans and domestic animals. Another recent example is the first report of the presence of human and chicken blood in the diet of Diphylla ecaudata vampire bats living in the highly anthropized Caatinga dry forests of northeastern Brazil [68]. This attractive effect of anthropized environments on bats and the consequent promiscuity of bats, domestic animals, and humans are most likely to increase the risk of direct transmission of viruses and to the probability to trigger the accidental process of emergence.
7. Deforestation trends and increased risk of emergence Bats have long rendered great services to mankind by acting positively on its environment and without living in a too close vicinity of human populations. However, by increasing the surface of cultivated areas and through the rapid growth of cities in the recent decades, men have drastically modified ecosystems which had remained in equilibrium for millennia. This evolution of ecosystems is even faster in Asia than in the rest of the world. Southeast Asia (SEA) is the region in the world that suffered the largest deforestation with a loss of 30% of forest surface over the last 40 years. In Thailand, agricultural lands represented 23% in 1960 and 40% since 1985 [69]. Similar trends were observed in other Southeast Asian countries [69]. In Cambodia, agricultural surfaces doubled from 15% in the 1980s to 30% in 2000. A similar trend was observed in Vietnam with an increase from 20% in 1990 to 35% today. In Indonesia, the growth was from 21% in the 1980s to 31.5% today. Deforestation is today linked to increased agricultural surfaces and to poorly managed urban growth. Owing to
evolving land use, bat populations are setting in area closer to human dwellings [70]. Anthropized rural environments are characterized by a wide diversity of landscapes comprising houses, barns, fields, orchards, and woods of differing density. Human dwellings are also established close to water which along with the presence of animals is favorable for insects and insectivorous bats. Unlike natural environment which are highly selective, these altered landscapes are acceptable by a wide range of bat species, usually not encountered together, which establish close to human dwellings. This results in a higher density of bat-borne CoVs in the close vicinity of human dwellings [70, 71, 72], and thus a higher risk of human infection through direct contact or contamination by urine or feces. An aggravating factor is that the human population growth is higher in suburban and rural areas generating thus a higher pressure on land use, agricultural land, and deforestation with the most common activities being farming, logging, and hunting. The recent acceleration of deforestation in Southeast Asia and all predictions based on demographic burden on land use clearly indicate that the risk of contact and of transmission of new microorganisms which could turn pathogenic for humans will increase. It is thus just a matter of time, chance to encounter appropriated targets (human or animal in close contact with humans) and viral mutations to adapt to new hosts. Similar trends of deforestation are occurring in South America, but landscape organization is different, and the human population density is far lower than in SEA making thus the risk perhaps lower. If the exact time and nature of the emergence cannot be predicted, the increased probability of encounter and occurrence of emergence-leading chain of events yielded by anthropized environment must be considered seriously.
originally posted by: Suspect1776
a reply to: Willtell
I found one of the articles Francis Boyle was referring to about a month ago when everyone was suspecting Bill Gates is behind this whole thing. I was not sure if it was the same virus at the time. I ended up doing some research on who was funding some of these programs at UNC and well it turns out Gates has been giving them money to them for over a decade. As I was looking more into the Gates foundation I noticed they also donated to Wuhan University as well. Yes they are in bed with UNC and Wuhan.
Another interesting thing I found connecting Gates and Baric, the doctor who led the coronavirus research, is a 900k dollar donation by the Gates foundation to NIH scientists in August of 2013. Then on September 9 of 2013 it was announced that Baric would lead the research of this coronavirus with a 10 million dollar grant for NIH. It's sad to see these people developing biowepons under the name of "research".
I believe the Gates and other elites might be behind more funding of this mad scientist lab at UNC. My theory is that they donate to organizations who fund these programs as a way of not having their names attached directly. Anyone with a brain knows when the Gates donate loads of money to something they want to have some influence of what goes on.
Gates donation to Wuhan University: www.gatesfoundation.org...
Database/Grants/2018/11/OPP1199760
2015 article: www.the-scientist.com...
Ralph S. Baric (man leading this coronavirus research) :sph.unc.edu...
www.med.unc.edu...
Gates NIH donation: www.gatesfoundation.org...
Baric NIH grant: sph.unc.edu...
Gates Foundation Grants : sph.unc.edu...
Donation to UNC for HIV prevention: www.gatesfoundation.org...
Database/Grants/2019/08/OPP1203712
Veneto regional president Luca Zaia said Saturday that the contagion showed that the virus is transmitted like any flu and that trying to pinpoint a single source for the cases or to establish a link to China no longer were effective containment measures. “You can get it from anyone,” he told reporters.
gnews.org...
The CCP also blames the US as the origin of the coronavirus.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: tetra50
no worries mate, the last big pandemic that hit hard was what the Spanish flu people that didnt die recovered in their life times.
without a major mutation this is probably not going to be a civilization killer, it might wreck economies for awhile but govts are not going away, and if we are not careful they will pass draconian style laws allowing them to use any and all means to control people, in their best interest of course.
It will suck, their will be many more deaths, but in the end the world will still turn the sun will still rise and people will still live.
I am not blowing it off I have prepared as much as I can, and me and the wife are prepared to bunker in with the boy for up to 3 months as long as water holds out.
But right now the economic damage added onto the potential supply disruptions scares me more than the flu, desperate people do horrible things and many people will be desperate when it hits the fan in their neighborhood.
originally posted by: checkmeout
Re Italy, my mum has a friend there near Naples. I asked how she was doing. Completely oblivious was the answer. She was a little shocked, either she doesn't follow the news or it wasn't being reported much. This was specifically about the lockdown. Ignorance is truly bliss for some.
Edit to add: attendance at Italy vs Scotland rugby yesterday was 54,349. Expect a new cluster soon? That was Rome. Also Princess Anne DID attend. Will she be the new super spreader?
originally posted by: KindraLaBelle
originally posted by: checkmeout
Re Italy, my mum has a friend there near Naples. I asked how she was doing. Completely oblivious was the answer. She was a little shocked, either she doesn't follow the news or it wasn't being reported much. This was specifically about the lockdown. Ignorance is truly bliss for some.
Edit to add: attendance at Italy vs Scotland rugby yesterday was 54,349. Expect a new cluster soon? That was Rome. Also Princess Anne DID attend. Will she be the new super spreader?
Probably most people in Italy who don't use Internet are not getting information right now.
confirmed cases so far: 132
Protected suits and military in the streets.
all further sports events are cancelled
twitter: #COVID19italia #CoronaVirusitaly (most info is in Italian and French)
Meanwhile in the rest of Europe, the attention-seeking-msm virologists, are now saying one by one that this IS now a pandemic and calling for everyone to prepare NOW and not wait it out! That is about the opposite from what they were saying a week ago.
What is a pandemic?
24 February 2010
A pandemic is the worldwide spread of a new disease.
An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus emerges and spreads around the world, and most people do not have immunity. Viruses that have caused past pandemics typically originated from animal influenza viruses.
Does that mean the CCP will admit they acquired the coronavirus strain they accidentally released from their P4 lab in Wuhan via espionage?
originally posted by: dollukka
a reply to: Kenzo
According to WHO definition
What is a pandemic?
24 February 2010
A pandemic is the worldwide spread of a new disease.
An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus emerges and spreads around the world, and most people do not have immunity. Viruses that have caused past pandemics typically originated from animal influenza viruses.
WHO
Seasonal influenza causes 4 -50 million symptomatic cases in EU/EEA each year, and 15 000 – 70 000 European citizens die every year of causes associated with influenza